Cargando…
Differential responses of the rhizosphere microbiome structure and soil metabolites in tea (Camellia sinensis) upon application of cow manure
BACKGROUND: The rhizosphere is the narrow zone of soil immediately surrounding the root, and it is a critical hotspot of microbial activity, strongly influencing the physiology and development of plants. For analyzing the relationship between the microbiome and metabolome in the rhizosphere of tea (...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8842532/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35164712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-022-02470-9 |
_version_ | 1784651066984366080 |
---|---|
author | Sun, Litao Wang, Yu Ma, Dexin Wang, Linlin Zhang, Xiaomei Ding, Yiqian Fan, Kai Xu, Ze Yuan, Changbo Jia, Houzhen Ren, Yonglin Ding, Zhaotang |
author_facet | Sun, Litao Wang, Yu Ma, Dexin Wang, Linlin Zhang, Xiaomei Ding, Yiqian Fan, Kai Xu, Ze Yuan, Changbo Jia, Houzhen Ren, Yonglin Ding, Zhaotang |
author_sort | Sun, Litao |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The rhizosphere is the narrow zone of soil immediately surrounding the root, and it is a critical hotspot of microbial activity, strongly influencing the physiology and development of plants. For analyzing the relationship between the microbiome and metabolome in the rhizosphere of tea (Camellia sinensis) plants, the bacterial composition and its correlation to soil metabolites were investigated under three different fertilization treatments (unfertilized, urea, cow manure) in different growing seasons (spring, early and late summer). RESULTS: The bacterial phyla Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Acidobacteria and Actinobacteria dominated the rhizosphere of tea plants regardless of the sampling time. These indicated that the compositional shift was associated with different fertilizer/manure treatments as well as the sampling time. However, the relative abundance of these enriched bacteria varied under the three different fertilizer regimes. Most of the enriched metabolic pathways stimulated by different fertilizer application were all related to sugars, amino acids fatty acids and alkaloids metabolism. Organic acids and fatty acids were potential metabolites mediating the plant-bacteria interaction in the rhizosphere. Bacteria in the genera Proteiniphilum, Fermentimonas and Pseudomonas in spring, Saccharimonadales and Gaiellales in early summer, Acidobacteriales and Gaiellales in late summer regulated relative contents of organic and fatty acids. CONCLUSION: This study documents the profound changes to the rhizosphere microbiome and bacterially derived metabolites under different fertilizer regimes and provides a conceptual framework towards improving the performance of tea plantations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12866-022-02470-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8842532 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88425322022-02-16 Differential responses of the rhizosphere microbiome structure and soil metabolites in tea (Camellia sinensis) upon application of cow manure Sun, Litao Wang, Yu Ma, Dexin Wang, Linlin Zhang, Xiaomei Ding, Yiqian Fan, Kai Xu, Ze Yuan, Changbo Jia, Houzhen Ren, Yonglin Ding, Zhaotang BMC Microbiol Research BACKGROUND: The rhizosphere is the narrow zone of soil immediately surrounding the root, and it is a critical hotspot of microbial activity, strongly influencing the physiology and development of plants. For analyzing the relationship between the microbiome and metabolome in the rhizosphere of tea (Camellia sinensis) plants, the bacterial composition and its correlation to soil metabolites were investigated under three different fertilization treatments (unfertilized, urea, cow manure) in different growing seasons (spring, early and late summer). RESULTS: The bacterial phyla Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Acidobacteria and Actinobacteria dominated the rhizosphere of tea plants regardless of the sampling time. These indicated that the compositional shift was associated with different fertilizer/manure treatments as well as the sampling time. However, the relative abundance of these enriched bacteria varied under the three different fertilizer regimes. Most of the enriched metabolic pathways stimulated by different fertilizer application were all related to sugars, amino acids fatty acids and alkaloids metabolism. Organic acids and fatty acids were potential metabolites mediating the plant-bacteria interaction in the rhizosphere. Bacteria in the genera Proteiniphilum, Fermentimonas and Pseudomonas in spring, Saccharimonadales and Gaiellales in early summer, Acidobacteriales and Gaiellales in late summer regulated relative contents of organic and fatty acids. CONCLUSION: This study documents the profound changes to the rhizosphere microbiome and bacterially derived metabolites under different fertilizer regimes and provides a conceptual framework towards improving the performance of tea plantations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12866-022-02470-9. BioMed Central 2022-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8842532/ /pubmed/35164712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-022-02470-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Sun, Litao Wang, Yu Ma, Dexin Wang, Linlin Zhang, Xiaomei Ding, Yiqian Fan, Kai Xu, Ze Yuan, Changbo Jia, Houzhen Ren, Yonglin Ding, Zhaotang Differential responses of the rhizosphere microbiome structure and soil metabolites in tea (Camellia sinensis) upon application of cow manure |
title | Differential responses of the rhizosphere microbiome structure and soil metabolites in tea (Camellia sinensis) upon application of cow manure |
title_full | Differential responses of the rhizosphere microbiome structure and soil metabolites in tea (Camellia sinensis) upon application of cow manure |
title_fullStr | Differential responses of the rhizosphere microbiome structure and soil metabolites in tea (Camellia sinensis) upon application of cow manure |
title_full_unstemmed | Differential responses of the rhizosphere microbiome structure and soil metabolites in tea (Camellia sinensis) upon application of cow manure |
title_short | Differential responses of the rhizosphere microbiome structure and soil metabolites in tea (Camellia sinensis) upon application of cow manure |
title_sort | differential responses of the rhizosphere microbiome structure and soil metabolites in tea (camellia sinensis) upon application of cow manure |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8842532/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35164712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-022-02470-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sunlitao differentialresponsesoftherhizospheremicrobiomestructureandsoilmetabolitesinteacamelliasinensisuponapplicationofcowmanure AT wangyu differentialresponsesoftherhizospheremicrobiomestructureandsoilmetabolitesinteacamelliasinensisuponapplicationofcowmanure AT madexin differentialresponsesoftherhizospheremicrobiomestructureandsoilmetabolitesinteacamelliasinensisuponapplicationofcowmanure AT wanglinlin differentialresponsesoftherhizospheremicrobiomestructureandsoilmetabolitesinteacamelliasinensisuponapplicationofcowmanure AT zhangxiaomei differentialresponsesoftherhizospheremicrobiomestructureandsoilmetabolitesinteacamelliasinensisuponapplicationofcowmanure AT dingyiqian differentialresponsesoftherhizospheremicrobiomestructureandsoilmetabolitesinteacamelliasinensisuponapplicationofcowmanure AT fankai differentialresponsesoftherhizospheremicrobiomestructureandsoilmetabolitesinteacamelliasinensisuponapplicationofcowmanure AT xuze differentialresponsesoftherhizospheremicrobiomestructureandsoilmetabolitesinteacamelliasinensisuponapplicationofcowmanure AT yuanchangbo differentialresponsesoftherhizospheremicrobiomestructureandsoilmetabolitesinteacamelliasinensisuponapplicationofcowmanure AT jiahouzhen differentialresponsesoftherhizospheremicrobiomestructureandsoilmetabolitesinteacamelliasinensisuponapplicationofcowmanure AT renyonglin differentialresponsesoftherhizospheremicrobiomestructureandsoilmetabolitesinteacamelliasinensisuponapplicationofcowmanure AT dingzhaotang differentialresponsesoftherhizospheremicrobiomestructureandsoilmetabolitesinteacamelliasinensisuponapplicationofcowmanure |