Cargando…

Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous A1 Pulley Release by Acupotomy (Needle-Knife): A Cadaveric Study of Safety and Efficacy

PURPOSE: This study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of ultrasound-guided percutaneous A1 pulley release by acupotomy on unembalmed cadavers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty digits (from six cadavers, three male and three female) were split into two groups using stratified randomization. All...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Jiaxuan, Ma, Bin, Zhong, Hao, Zhang, Yue, Zhu, Jiang, Ni, Yong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8842668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35173479
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S349869
_version_ 1784651096203984896
author Yang, Jiaxuan
Ma, Bin
Zhong, Hao
Zhang, Yue
Zhu, Jiang
Ni, Yong
author_facet Yang, Jiaxuan
Ma, Bin
Zhong, Hao
Zhang, Yue
Zhu, Jiang
Ni, Yong
author_sort Yang, Jiaxuan
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of ultrasound-guided percutaneous A1 pulley release by acupotomy on unembalmed cadavers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty digits (from six cadavers, three male and three female) were split into two groups using stratified randomization. All procedures were completed by a single doctor with rich experience in ultrasound-guided treatment. In the acupotomy group, the A1 pulley was released under ultrasound-guided by a needle-knife; while in the needle group, the A1 pulley was released under ultrasound-guided by a 21-gauge needle. Two groups completed six thumbs and 24 fingers, respectively. Another anatomist, blinded to the two techniques, assessed the safety, including the minimum distance between the incision and the neurovascular; flexor tendon, neurovascular and A2 pulley injury or not. Completeness release of the A1 pulley was recorded as effectiveness. RESULTS: No neurovascular or A2 pulley injuries were recorded. However, the incision of the thumb in both groups biased to the radial side (P <0.05), while the incision of the finger biased to the ulnar side (P <0.05). No significant flexor tendon injury was found, and only five cases (16.7%) had minor scratches in the acupotomy group; while in the needle group, 15 cases had minor scratches and lacerations occurred in three cases. The flexor tendon injury rate was 60%. Compared with the needle, ultrasound-guided acupotomy release is safer (P <0.05). The ultrasound-guided acupotomy technique was significantly more likely to result in a complete A1 pulley release compared to the needle technique (28 of 30 [93.3%] versus 11 of 30 [36.7%]; P <0.05). CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided percutaneous A1 pulley release by acupotomy is a safe and effective technique. When releasing the thumb by ultrasound-guided, be careful not to bias to the radial side to avoid neurovascular injury, while when releasing a finger, be careful not to bias to the ulnar side.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8842668
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88426682022-02-15 Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous A1 Pulley Release by Acupotomy (Needle-Knife): A Cadaveric Study of Safety and Efficacy Yang, Jiaxuan Ma, Bin Zhong, Hao Zhang, Yue Zhu, Jiang Ni, Yong J Pain Res Original Research PURPOSE: This study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of ultrasound-guided percutaneous A1 pulley release by acupotomy on unembalmed cadavers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty digits (from six cadavers, three male and three female) were split into two groups using stratified randomization. All procedures were completed by a single doctor with rich experience in ultrasound-guided treatment. In the acupotomy group, the A1 pulley was released under ultrasound-guided by a needle-knife; while in the needle group, the A1 pulley was released under ultrasound-guided by a 21-gauge needle. Two groups completed six thumbs and 24 fingers, respectively. Another anatomist, blinded to the two techniques, assessed the safety, including the minimum distance between the incision and the neurovascular; flexor tendon, neurovascular and A2 pulley injury or not. Completeness release of the A1 pulley was recorded as effectiveness. RESULTS: No neurovascular or A2 pulley injuries were recorded. However, the incision of the thumb in both groups biased to the radial side (P <0.05), while the incision of the finger biased to the ulnar side (P <0.05). No significant flexor tendon injury was found, and only five cases (16.7%) had minor scratches in the acupotomy group; while in the needle group, 15 cases had minor scratches and lacerations occurred in three cases. The flexor tendon injury rate was 60%. Compared with the needle, ultrasound-guided acupotomy release is safer (P <0.05). The ultrasound-guided acupotomy technique was significantly more likely to result in a complete A1 pulley release compared to the needle technique (28 of 30 [93.3%] versus 11 of 30 [36.7%]; P <0.05). CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided percutaneous A1 pulley release by acupotomy is a safe and effective technique. When releasing the thumb by ultrasound-guided, be careful not to bias to the radial side to avoid neurovascular injury, while when releasing a finger, be careful not to bias to the ulnar side. Dove 2022-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8842668/ /pubmed/35173479 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S349869 Text en © 2022 Yang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Yang, Jiaxuan
Ma, Bin
Zhong, Hao
Zhang, Yue
Zhu, Jiang
Ni, Yong
Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous A1 Pulley Release by Acupotomy (Needle-Knife): A Cadaveric Study of Safety and Efficacy
title Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous A1 Pulley Release by Acupotomy (Needle-Knife): A Cadaveric Study of Safety and Efficacy
title_full Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous A1 Pulley Release by Acupotomy (Needle-Knife): A Cadaveric Study of Safety and Efficacy
title_fullStr Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous A1 Pulley Release by Acupotomy (Needle-Knife): A Cadaveric Study of Safety and Efficacy
title_full_unstemmed Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous A1 Pulley Release by Acupotomy (Needle-Knife): A Cadaveric Study of Safety and Efficacy
title_short Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous A1 Pulley Release by Acupotomy (Needle-Knife): A Cadaveric Study of Safety and Efficacy
title_sort ultrasound-guided percutaneous a1 pulley release by acupotomy (needle-knife): a cadaveric study of safety and efficacy
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8842668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35173479
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S349869
work_keys_str_mv AT yangjiaxuan ultrasoundguidedpercutaneousa1pulleyreleasebyacupotomyneedleknifeacadavericstudyofsafetyandefficacy
AT mabin ultrasoundguidedpercutaneousa1pulleyreleasebyacupotomyneedleknifeacadavericstudyofsafetyandefficacy
AT zhonghao ultrasoundguidedpercutaneousa1pulleyreleasebyacupotomyneedleknifeacadavericstudyofsafetyandefficacy
AT zhangyue ultrasoundguidedpercutaneousa1pulleyreleasebyacupotomyneedleknifeacadavericstudyofsafetyandefficacy
AT zhujiang ultrasoundguidedpercutaneousa1pulleyreleasebyacupotomyneedleknifeacadavericstudyofsafetyandefficacy
AT niyong ultrasoundguidedpercutaneousa1pulleyreleasebyacupotomyneedleknifeacadavericstudyofsafetyandefficacy