Cargando…

Influence of Right Ventricular Dysfunction on Outcomes of Left Ventricular Non-compaction Cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND: Various adverse outcomes such as mortality and rehospitalization are associated with left ventricular non-compaction (LVNC). Due to data limitations, prospective risk assessment for LVNC remains challenging. This study aimed to investigate the influence of right ventricular (RV) dysfunct...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Wuwan, Chen, Wei, Lin, Xue, Fang, Ligang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8842670/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35174234
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.816404
_version_ 1784651096711495680
author Wang, Wuwan
Chen, Wei
Lin, Xue
Fang, Ligang
author_facet Wang, Wuwan
Chen, Wei
Lin, Xue
Fang, Ligang
author_sort Wang, Wuwan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Various adverse outcomes such as mortality and rehospitalization are associated with left ventricular non-compaction (LVNC). Due to data limitations, prospective risk assessment for LVNC remains challenging. This study aimed to investigate the influence of right ventricular (RV) dysfunction on the clinical outcomes of patients with LVNC through accurate and comprehensive measurements of RV function. METHODS AND RESULTS: Overall, 117 patients with LVNC (47.6 ± 18.3 years, 34.2% male) were enrolled, including 53 (45.3%) and 64 (54.7%) patients with and without RV dysfunction, respectively. RV dysfunction was defined as meeting any two of the following criteria: (i) tricuspid annular systolic excursions <17 mm, (ii) tricuspid S′ velocity <10 cm/s, and (iii) RV fractional area change (FAC) <35%. The proportion of biventricular involvement was significantly higher in patients with RV dysfunction than in controls (p = 0.0155). After a follow-up period of 69.0 [33.5, 96.0] months, 18 (15.4%) patients reached the primary endpoint (all-cause mortality), with 14 (26.4%) and 4 (6.3%) from the RV dysfunction group and normal RV function group, respectively. The Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test revealed that patients with RV dysfunction had a higher risk of all-cause mortality than those in the control group (hazard ratio [HR]: 5.132 [2.003, 13.15], p = 0.0013). Similar results were obtained for patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50% [HR, 6.582; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.045–21.19; p = 0.0367]. The relationship between RV dysfunction and heart failure rehospitalization and implantation of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD)/cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) was not statistically significant (both p > 0.05). The multivariable Cox proportional hazard modeling analysis showed that RV dysfunction (HR: 4.950 [1.378, 17.783], p = 0.014) and impaired RV global longitudinal strain (RVGLS) (HR: 1.103 [1.004, 1.212], p = 0.041) were independent predictors of mortality rather than increased RV end-diastolic area and decreased LVEF (both p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: RV dysfunction is associated with the prognosis of patients with LVNC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8842670
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88426702022-02-15 Influence of Right Ventricular Dysfunction on Outcomes of Left Ventricular Non-compaction Cardiomyopathy Wang, Wuwan Chen, Wei Lin, Xue Fang, Ligang Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine BACKGROUND: Various adverse outcomes such as mortality and rehospitalization are associated with left ventricular non-compaction (LVNC). Due to data limitations, prospective risk assessment for LVNC remains challenging. This study aimed to investigate the influence of right ventricular (RV) dysfunction on the clinical outcomes of patients with LVNC through accurate and comprehensive measurements of RV function. METHODS AND RESULTS: Overall, 117 patients with LVNC (47.6 ± 18.3 years, 34.2% male) were enrolled, including 53 (45.3%) and 64 (54.7%) patients with and without RV dysfunction, respectively. RV dysfunction was defined as meeting any two of the following criteria: (i) tricuspid annular systolic excursions <17 mm, (ii) tricuspid S′ velocity <10 cm/s, and (iii) RV fractional area change (FAC) <35%. The proportion of biventricular involvement was significantly higher in patients with RV dysfunction than in controls (p = 0.0155). After a follow-up period of 69.0 [33.5, 96.0] months, 18 (15.4%) patients reached the primary endpoint (all-cause mortality), with 14 (26.4%) and 4 (6.3%) from the RV dysfunction group and normal RV function group, respectively. The Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test revealed that patients with RV dysfunction had a higher risk of all-cause mortality than those in the control group (hazard ratio [HR]: 5.132 [2.003, 13.15], p = 0.0013). Similar results were obtained for patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50% [HR, 6.582; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.045–21.19; p = 0.0367]. The relationship between RV dysfunction and heart failure rehospitalization and implantation of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD)/cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) was not statistically significant (both p > 0.05). The multivariable Cox proportional hazard modeling analysis showed that RV dysfunction (HR: 4.950 [1.378, 17.783], p = 0.014) and impaired RV global longitudinal strain (RVGLS) (HR: 1.103 [1.004, 1.212], p = 0.041) were independent predictors of mortality rather than increased RV end-diastolic area and decreased LVEF (both p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: RV dysfunction is associated with the prognosis of patients with LVNC. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8842670/ /pubmed/35174234 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.816404 Text en Copyright © 2022 Wang, Chen, Lin and Fang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Wang, Wuwan
Chen, Wei
Lin, Xue
Fang, Ligang
Influence of Right Ventricular Dysfunction on Outcomes of Left Ventricular Non-compaction Cardiomyopathy
title Influence of Right Ventricular Dysfunction on Outcomes of Left Ventricular Non-compaction Cardiomyopathy
title_full Influence of Right Ventricular Dysfunction on Outcomes of Left Ventricular Non-compaction Cardiomyopathy
title_fullStr Influence of Right Ventricular Dysfunction on Outcomes of Left Ventricular Non-compaction Cardiomyopathy
title_full_unstemmed Influence of Right Ventricular Dysfunction on Outcomes of Left Ventricular Non-compaction Cardiomyopathy
title_short Influence of Right Ventricular Dysfunction on Outcomes of Left Ventricular Non-compaction Cardiomyopathy
title_sort influence of right ventricular dysfunction on outcomes of left ventricular non-compaction cardiomyopathy
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8842670/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35174234
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.816404
work_keys_str_mv AT wangwuwan influenceofrightventriculardysfunctiononoutcomesofleftventricularnoncompactioncardiomyopathy
AT chenwei influenceofrightventriculardysfunctiononoutcomesofleftventricularnoncompactioncardiomyopathy
AT linxue influenceofrightventriculardysfunctiononoutcomesofleftventricularnoncompactioncardiomyopathy
AT fangligang influenceofrightventriculardysfunctiononoutcomesofleftventricularnoncompactioncardiomyopathy