Cargando…

Implementing traumatic brain injury screening in behavioral healthcare: protocol for a prospective mixed methods study

BACKGROUND: Characteristics of both individuals and innovations are foundational determinants to the adoption of evidenced-based practices (EBPs). However, our understanding about what drives EBP adoption is limited by few studies examining relationships among implementation determinants and impleme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coxe-Hyzak, Kathryn A., Bunger, Alicia C., Bogner, Jennifer, Davis, Alan K., Corrigan, John D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8842803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35164885
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-022-00261-x
_version_ 1784651128479154176
author Coxe-Hyzak, Kathryn A.
Bunger, Alicia C.
Bogner, Jennifer
Davis, Alan K.
Corrigan, John D.
author_facet Coxe-Hyzak, Kathryn A.
Bunger, Alicia C.
Bogner, Jennifer
Davis, Alan K.
Corrigan, John D.
author_sort Coxe-Hyzak, Kathryn A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Characteristics of both individuals and innovations are foundational determinants to the adoption of evidenced-based practices (EBPs). However, our understanding about what drives EBP adoption is limited by few studies examining relationships among implementation determinants and implementation outcomes through theory-driven hypothesis testing. Therefore, drawing on the Theory of Planned Behavior and Diffusion of Innovations Theory, this study will disentangle relationships between provider characteristics and innovation factors on the early adoption of the Ohio State University Traumatic Brain Injury Identification Method (OSU TBI-ID) in behavioral health settings. METHODS: This study will utilize an explanatory sequential mixed methods design. In Phase I (quantitative), Time 1, we will investigate behavioral health providers (N = 200) attitudes, perceived behavioral control, subjective norms, and intentions to screen for TBI upon completion of a video module introducing the OSU TBI-ID. At Time 2, we will examine the number of TBI screens conducted over the previous month, as well as the feasibility, appropriateness, and acceptability of using the OSU TBI-ID in practice. Structural equation modeling will be used to determine whether provider characteristics predict TBI screening intentions, and whether intentions mediate actual TBI screening behaviors. We will then test whether feasibility, appropriateness, and acceptability of the OSU TBI-ID moderates the relationship between intentions and TBI screening behaviors. In Phase II (qualitative), we will develop an interview guide using results from Phase I and will conduct semi-structured interviews with providers (N = 20) to assess contextual determinants of TBI screening adoption. Qualitative data will be thematically analyzed using sensitizing concepts from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and integrated with the quantitative results using a joint display. DISCUSSION: This mixed methods study capitalizes on two theory-driven hypotheses bridging proximal (e.g., screening intent) to distal (actual behaviors) implementation outcomes and will contextualize these results qualitatively to advance our understanding about why TBI screening adoption has failed to translate to the behavioral healthcare context. Results of this study will offer insights into what is driving TBI screening adoption so that implementation strategies can be selected with greater precision to improve the adoption, sustainment, and scale-up of TBI screening in behavioral healthcare. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43058-022-00261-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8842803
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88428032022-02-16 Implementing traumatic brain injury screening in behavioral healthcare: protocol for a prospective mixed methods study Coxe-Hyzak, Kathryn A. Bunger, Alicia C. Bogner, Jennifer Davis, Alan K. Corrigan, John D. Implement Sci Commun Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Characteristics of both individuals and innovations are foundational determinants to the adoption of evidenced-based practices (EBPs). However, our understanding about what drives EBP adoption is limited by few studies examining relationships among implementation determinants and implementation outcomes through theory-driven hypothesis testing. Therefore, drawing on the Theory of Planned Behavior and Diffusion of Innovations Theory, this study will disentangle relationships between provider characteristics and innovation factors on the early adoption of the Ohio State University Traumatic Brain Injury Identification Method (OSU TBI-ID) in behavioral health settings. METHODS: This study will utilize an explanatory sequential mixed methods design. In Phase I (quantitative), Time 1, we will investigate behavioral health providers (N = 200) attitudes, perceived behavioral control, subjective norms, and intentions to screen for TBI upon completion of a video module introducing the OSU TBI-ID. At Time 2, we will examine the number of TBI screens conducted over the previous month, as well as the feasibility, appropriateness, and acceptability of using the OSU TBI-ID in practice. Structural equation modeling will be used to determine whether provider characteristics predict TBI screening intentions, and whether intentions mediate actual TBI screening behaviors. We will then test whether feasibility, appropriateness, and acceptability of the OSU TBI-ID moderates the relationship between intentions and TBI screening behaviors. In Phase II (qualitative), we will develop an interview guide using results from Phase I and will conduct semi-structured interviews with providers (N = 20) to assess contextual determinants of TBI screening adoption. Qualitative data will be thematically analyzed using sensitizing concepts from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and integrated with the quantitative results using a joint display. DISCUSSION: This mixed methods study capitalizes on two theory-driven hypotheses bridging proximal (e.g., screening intent) to distal (actual behaviors) implementation outcomes and will contextualize these results qualitatively to advance our understanding about why TBI screening adoption has failed to translate to the behavioral healthcare context. Results of this study will offer insights into what is driving TBI screening adoption so that implementation strategies can be selected with greater precision to improve the adoption, sustainment, and scale-up of TBI screening in behavioral healthcare. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43058-022-00261-x. BioMed Central 2022-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8842803/ /pubmed/35164885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-022-00261-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Coxe-Hyzak, Kathryn A.
Bunger, Alicia C.
Bogner, Jennifer
Davis, Alan K.
Corrigan, John D.
Implementing traumatic brain injury screening in behavioral healthcare: protocol for a prospective mixed methods study
title Implementing traumatic brain injury screening in behavioral healthcare: protocol for a prospective mixed methods study
title_full Implementing traumatic brain injury screening in behavioral healthcare: protocol for a prospective mixed methods study
title_fullStr Implementing traumatic brain injury screening in behavioral healthcare: protocol for a prospective mixed methods study
title_full_unstemmed Implementing traumatic brain injury screening in behavioral healthcare: protocol for a prospective mixed methods study
title_short Implementing traumatic brain injury screening in behavioral healthcare: protocol for a prospective mixed methods study
title_sort implementing traumatic brain injury screening in behavioral healthcare: protocol for a prospective mixed methods study
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8842803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35164885
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-022-00261-x
work_keys_str_mv AT coxehyzakkathryna implementingtraumaticbraininjuryscreeninginbehavioralhealthcareprotocolforaprospectivemixedmethodsstudy
AT bungeraliciac implementingtraumaticbraininjuryscreeninginbehavioralhealthcareprotocolforaprospectivemixedmethodsstudy
AT bognerjennifer implementingtraumaticbraininjuryscreeninginbehavioralhealthcareprotocolforaprospectivemixedmethodsstudy
AT davisalank implementingtraumaticbraininjuryscreeninginbehavioralhealthcareprotocolforaprospectivemixedmethodsstudy
AT corriganjohnd implementingtraumaticbraininjuryscreeninginbehavioralhealthcareprotocolforaprospectivemixedmethodsstudy