Cargando…

What are the strategies for implementing primary care models in maternity? A systematic review on midwifery units

BACKGROUND: Midwifery Units (MUs) are associated with optimal perinatal outcomes, improved service users’ and professionals’ satisfaction as well as being the most cost-effective option. However, they still do not represent the mainstream option of maternity care in many countries. Understanding eff...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Batinelli, Laura, Thaels, Ellen, Leister, Nathalie, McCourt, Christine, Bonciani, Manila, Rocca-Ihenacho, Lucia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8842978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35152880
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04410-x
_version_ 1784651159783342080
author Batinelli, Laura
Thaels, Ellen
Leister, Nathalie
McCourt, Christine
Bonciani, Manila
Rocca-Ihenacho, Lucia
author_facet Batinelli, Laura
Thaels, Ellen
Leister, Nathalie
McCourt, Christine
Bonciani, Manila
Rocca-Ihenacho, Lucia
author_sort Batinelli, Laura
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Midwifery Units (MUs) are associated with optimal perinatal outcomes, improved service users’ and professionals’ satisfaction as well as being the most cost-effective option. However, they still do not represent the mainstream option of maternity care in many countries. Understanding effective strategies to integrate this model of care into maternity services could support and inform the MU implementation process that many countries and regions still need to approach. METHODS: A systematic search and screening of qualitative and quantitative research about implementation of new MUs was conducted (Prospero protocol reference: CRD42019141443) using PRISMA guidelines. Included articles were appraised using the CASP checklist. A meta-synthesis approach to analysis was used. No exclusion criteria for time or context were applied to ensure inclusion of different implementation attempts even under different historical and social circumstances. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to reflect the major contribution of higher quality studies. RESULTS: From 1037 initial citations, twelve studies were identified for inclusion in this review after a screening process. The synthesis highlighted two broad categories: implementation readiness and strategies used. The first included aspects related to cultural, organisational and professional levels of the local context whilst the latter synthesised the main actions and key points identified in the included studies when implementing MUs. A logic model was created to synthesise and visually present the findings. CONCLUSIONS: The studies selected were from a range of settings and time periods and used varying strategies. Nonetheless, consistencies were found across different implementation processes. These findings can be used in the systematic scaling up of MUs and can help in addressing barriers at system, service and individual levels. All three levels need to be addressed when implementing this model of care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8842978
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88429782022-02-16 What are the strategies for implementing primary care models in maternity? A systematic review on midwifery units Batinelli, Laura Thaels, Ellen Leister, Nathalie McCourt, Christine Bonciani, Manila Rocca-Ihenacho, Lucia BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research BACKGROUND: Midwifery Units (MUs) are associated with optimal perinatal outcomes, improved service users’ and professionals’ satisfaction as well as being the most cost-effective option. However, they still do not represent the mainstream option of maternity care in many countries. Understanding effective strategies to integrate this model of care into maternity services could support and inform the MU implementation process that many countries and regions still need to approach. METHODS: A systematic search and screening of qualitative and quantitative research about implementation of new MUs was conducted (Prospero protocol reference: CRD42019141443) using PRISMA guidelines. Included articles were appraised using the CASP checklist. A meta-synthesis approach to analysis was used. No exclusion criteria for time or context were applied to ensure inclusion of different implementation attempts even under different historical and social circumstances. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to reflect the major contribution of higher quality studies. RESULTS: From 1037 initial citations, twelve studies were identified for inclusion in this review after a screening process. The synthesis highlighted two broad categories: implementation readiness and strategies used. The first included aspects related to cultural, organisational and professional levels of the local context whilst the latter synthesised the main actions and key points identified in the included studies when implementing MUs. A logic model was created to synthesise and visually present the findings. CONCLUSIONS: The studies selected were from a range of settings and time periods and used varying strategies. Nonetheless, consistencies were found across different implementation processes. These findings can be used in the systematic scaling up of MUs and can help in addressing barriers at system, service and individual levels. All three levels need to be addressed when implementing this model of care. BioMed Central 2022-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8842978/ /pubmed/35152880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04410-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Batinelli, Laura
Thaels, Ellen
Leister, Nathalie
McCourt, Christine
Bonciani, Manila
Rocca-Ihenacho, Lucia
What are the strategies for implementing primary care models in maternity? A systematic review on midwifery units
title What are the strategies for implementing primary care models in maternity? A systematic review on midwifery units
title_full What are the strategies for implementing primary care models in maternity? A systematic review on midwifery units
title_fullStr What are the strategies for implementing primary care models in maternity? A systematic review on midwifery units
title_full_unstemmed What are the strategies for implementing primary care models in maternity? A systematic review on midwifery units
title_short What are the strategies for implementing primary care models in maternity? A systematic review on midwifery units
title_sort what are the strategies for implementing primary care models in maternity? a systematic review on midwifery units
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8842978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35152880
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04410-x
work_keys_str_mv AT batinellilaura whatarethestrategiesforimplementingprimarycaremodelsinmaternityasystematicreviewonmidwiferyunits
AT thaelsellen whatarethestrategiesforimplementingprimarycaremodelsinmaternityasystematicreviewonmidwiferyunits
AT leisternathalie whatarethestrategiesforimplementingprimarycaremodelsinmaternityasystematicreviewonmidwiferyunits
AT mccourtchristine whatarethestrategiesforimplementingprimarycaremodelsinmaternityasystematicreviewonmidwiferyunits
AT boncianimanila whatarethestrategiesforimplementingprimarycaremodelsinmaternityasystematicreviewonmidwiferyunits
AT roccaihenacholucia whatarethestrategiesforimplementingprimarycaremodelsinmaternityasystematicreviewonmidwiferyunits