Cargando…

Development and validation of a model to predict rebleeding within three days after endoscopic hemostasis for high-risk peptic ulcer bleeding

BACKGROUND: Peptic ulcer bleeding remains a typical medical emergency with significant morbidity and mortality. Peptic ulcer rebleeding often occurs within three days after emergent endoscopic hemostasis. Our study aims to develop a nomogram to predict rebleeding within three days after emergent end...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lai, Yongkang, Xu, Yuling, Zhu, Zhenhua, Pan, Xiaolin, Long, Shunhua, Liao, Wangdi, Li, Bimin, Zhu, Yin, Chen, Youxiang, Shu, Xu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8843020/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35164682
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-022-02145-9
_version_ 1784651165030416384
author Lai, Yongkang
Xu, Yuling
Zhu, Zhenhua
Pan, Xiaolin
Long, Shunhua
Liao, Wangdi
Li, Bimin
Zhu, Yin
Chen, Youxiang
Shu, Xu
author_facet Lai, Yongkang
Xu, Yuling
Zhu, Zhenhua
Pan, Xiaolin
Long, Shunhua
Liao, Wangdi
Li, Bimin
Zhu, Yin
Chen, Youxiang
Shu, Xu
author_sort Lai, Yongkang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Peptic ulcer bleeding remains a typical medical emergency with significant morbidity and mortality. Peptic ulcer rebleeding often occurs within three days after emergent endoscopic hemostasis. Our study aims to develop a nomogram to predict rebleeding within three days after emergent endoscopic hemostasis for high-risk peptic ulcer bleeding. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of 386 patients with bleeding ulcers and high-risk stigmata who underwent emergent endoscopic hemostasis between March 2014 and October 2018. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method was used to identify predictors. The model was displayed as a nomogram. Internal validation was carried out using bootstrapping. The model was evaluated using the calibration plot, decision-curve analyses, and clinical impact curve. RESULTS: Overall, 386 patients meeting the inclusion criteria were enrolled, with 48 patients developed rebleeding within three days after initial endoscopic hemostasis. Predictors contained in the nomogram included albumin, prothrombin time, shock, haematemesis/melena and Forrest classification. The model showed good discrimination and good calibration with a C-index of 0.854 (C-index: 0.830 via bootstrapping validation). Decision-curve analyses and clinical impact curve also demonstrated that it was clinically valuable. CONCLUSION: This study presents a nomogram that incorporates clinical, laboratory, and endoscopic features, effectively predicting rebleeding within three days after emergent endoscopic hemostasis and identifying high-risk rebleeding patients with peptic ulcer bleeding. Trial registration This clinical trial has been registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT04895904) approved by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12876-022-02145-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8843020
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88430202022-02-16 Development and validation of a model to predict rebleeding within three days after endoscopic hemostasis for high-risk peptic ulcer bleeding Lai, Yongkang Xu, Yuling Zhu, Zhenhua Pan, Xiaolin Long, Shunhua Liao, Wangdi Li, Bimin Zhu, Yin Chen, Youxiang Shu, Xu BMC Gastroenterol Research BACKGROUND: Peptic ulcer bleeding remains a typical medical emergency with significant morbidity and mortality. Peptic ulcer rebleeding often occurs within three days after emergent endoscopic hemostasis. Our study aims to develop a nomogram to predict rebleeding within three days after emergent endoscopic hemostasis for high-risk peptic ulcer bleeding. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of 386 patients with bleeding ulcers and high-risk stigmata who underwent emergent endoscopic hemostasis between March 2014 and October 2018. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method was used to identify predictors. The model was displayed as a nomogram. Internal validation was carried out using bootstrapping. The model was evaluated using the calibration plot, decision-curve analyses, and clinical impact curve. RESULTS: Overall, 386 patients meeting the inclusion criteria were enrolled, with 48 patients developed rebleeding within three days after initial endoscopic hemostasis. Predictors contained in the nomogram included albumin, prothrombin time, shock, haematemesis/melena and Forrest classification. The model showed good discrimination and good calibration with a C-index of 0.854 (C-index: 0.830 via bootstrapping validation). Decision-curve analyses and clinical impact curve also demonstrated that it was clinically valuable. CONCLUSION: This study presents a nomogram that incorporates clinical, laboratory, and endoscopic features, effectively predicting rebleeding within three days after emergent endoscopic hemostasis and identifying high-risk rebleeding patients with peptic ulcer bleeding. Trial registration This clinical trial has been registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT04895904) approved by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12876-022-02145-9. BioMed Central 2022-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8843020/ /pubmed/35164682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-022-02145-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Lai, Yongkang
Xu, Yuling
Zhu, Zhenhua
Pan, Xiaolin
Long, Shunhua
Liao, Wangdi
Li, Bimin
Zhu, Yin
Chen, Youxiang
Shu, Xu
Development and validation of a model to predict rebleeding within three days after endoscopic hemostasis for high-risk peptic ulcer bleeding
title Development and validation of a model to predict rebleeding within three days after endoscopic hemostasis for high-risk peptic ulcer bleeding
title_full Development and validation of a model to predict rebleeding within three days after endoscopic hemostasis for high-risk peptic ulcer bleeding
title_fullStr Development and validation of a model to predict rebleeding within three days after endoscopic hemostasis for high-risk peptic ulcer bleeding
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of a model to predict rebleeding within three days after endoscopic hemostasis for high-risk peptic ulcer bleeding
title_short Development and validation of a model to predict rebleeding within three days after endoscopic hemostasis for high-risk peptic ulcer bleeding
title_sort development and validation of a model to predict rebleeding within three days after endoscopic hemostasis for high-risk peptic ulcer bleeding
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8843020/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35164682
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-022-02145-9
work_keys_str_mv AT laiyongkang developmentandvalidationofamodeltopredictrebleedingwithinthreedaysafterendoscopichemostasisforhighriskpepticulcerbleeding
AT xuyuling developmentandvalidationofamodeltopredictrebleedingwithinthreedaysafterendoscopichemostasisforhighriskpepticulcerbleeding
AT zhuzhenhua developmentandvalidationofamodeltopredictrebleedingwithinthreedaysafterendoscopichemostasisforhighriskpepticulcerbleeding
AT panxiaolin developmentandvalidationofamodeltopredictrebleedingwithinthreedaysafterendoscopichemostasisforhighriskpepticulcerbleeding
AT longshunhua developmentandvalidationofamodeltopredictrebleedingwithinthreedaysafterendoscopichemostasisforhighriskpepticulcerbleeding
AT liaowangdi developmentandvalidationofamodeltopredictrebleedingwithinthreedaysafterendoscopichemostasisforhighriskpepticulcerbleeding
AT libimin developmentandvalidationofamodeltopredictrebleedingwithinthreedaysafterendoscopichemostasisforhighriskpepticulcerbleeding
AT zhuyin developmentandvalidationofamodeltopredictrebleedingwithinthreedaysafterendoscopichemostasisforhighriskpepticulcerbleeding
AT chenyouxiang developmentandvalidationofamodeltopredictrebleedingwithinthreedaysafterendoscopichemostasisforhighriskpepticulcerbleeding
AT shuxu developmentandvalidationofamodeltopredictrebleedingwithinthreedaysafterendoscopichemostasisforhighriskpepticulcerbleeding