Cargando…

Pharmacodynamic evaluation and safety assessment of treatment with antibodies to serum amyloid P component in patients with cardiac amyloidosis: an open-label Phase 2 study and an adjunctive immuno-PET imaging study

BACKGROUND: In a Phase I study treatment with the serum amyloid P component (SAP) depleter miridesap followed by monoclonal antibody to SAP (dezamizumab) showed removal of amyloid from liver, spleen and kidney in patients with systemic amyloidosis. We report results from a Phase 2 study and concurre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wechalekar, Ashutosh, Antoni, Gunnar, Al Azzam, Wasfi, Bergström, Mats, Biswas, Swethajit, Chen, Chao, Cheriyan, Joseph, Cleveland, Matthew, Cookson, Louise, Galette, Paul, Janiczek, Robert L., Kwong, Raymond Y., Lukas, Mary Ann, Millns, Helen, Richards, Duncan, Schneider, Ian, Solomon, Scott D., Sörensen, Jens, Storey, James, Thompson, Douglas, van Dongen, Guus, Vugts, Danielle J., Wall, Anders, Wikström, Gerhard, Falk, Rodney H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8843022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35152886
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-02407-6
_version_ 1784651165509615616
author Wechalekar, Ashutosh
Antoni, Gunnar
Al Azzam, Wasfi
Bergström, Mats
Biswas, Swethajit
Chen, Chao
Cheriyan, Joseph
Cleveland, Matthew
Cookson, Louise
Galette, Paul
Janiczek, Robert L.
Kwong, Raymond Y.
Lukas, Mary Ann
Millns, Helen
Richards, Duncan
Schneider, Ian
Solomon, Scott D.
Sörensen, Jens
Storey, James
Thompson, Douglas
van Dongen, Guus
Vugts, Danielle J.
Wall, Anders
Wikström, Gerhard
Falk, Rodney H.
author_facet Wechalekar, Ashutosh
Antoni, Gunnar
Al Azzam, Wasfi
Bergström, Mats
Biswas, Swethajit
Chen, Chao
Cheriyan, Joseph
Cleveland, Matthew
Cookson, Louise
Galette, Paul
Janiczek, Robert L.
Kwong, Raymond Y.
Lukas, Mary Ann
Millns, Helen
Richards, Duncan
Schneider, Ian
Solomon, Scott D.
Sörensen, Jens
Storey, James
Thompson, Douglas
van Dongen, Guus
Vugts, Danielle J.
Wall, Anders
Wikström, Gerhard
Falk, Rodney H.
author_sort Wechalekar, Ashutosh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In a Phase I study treatment with the serum amyloid P component (SAP) depleter miridesap followed by monoclonal antibody to SAP (dezamizumab) showed removal of amyloid from liver, spleen and kidney in patients with systemic amyloidosis. We report results from a Phase 2 study and concurrent immuno-positron emission tomography (PET) study assessing efficacy, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, safety and cardiac uptake (of dezamizumab) following the same intervention in patients with cardiac amyloidosis. METHODS: Both were uncontrolled open-label studies. After SAP depletion with miridesap, patients received ≤ 6 monthly doses of dezamizumab in the Phase 2 trial (n = 7), ≤ 2 doses of non-radiolabelled dezamizumab plus [(89)Zr]Zr-dezamizumab (total mass dose of 80 mg at session 1 and 500 mg at session 2) in the immuno-PET study (n = 2). Primary endpoints of the Phase 2 study were changed from baseline to follow-up (at 8 weeks) in left ventricular mass (LVM) by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and safety. Primary endpoint of the immuno-PET study was [(89)Zr]Zr-dezamizumab cardiac uptake assessed via PET. RESULTS: Dezamizumab produced no appreciable or consistent reduction in LVM nor improvement in cardiac function in the Phase 2 study. In the immuno-PET study, measurable cardiac uptake of [(89)Zr]Zr-dezamizumab, although seen in both patients, was moderate to low. Uptake was notably lower in the patient with higher LVM. Treatment-associated rash with cutaneous small-vessel vasculitis was observed in both studies. Abdominal large-vessel vasculitis after initial dezamizumab dosing (300 mg) occurred in the first patient with immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis enrolled in the Phase 2 study. Symptom resolution was nearly complete within 24 h of intravenous methylprednisolone and dezamizumab discontinuation; abdominal computed tomography imaging showed vasculitis resolution by 8 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike previous observations of visceral amyloid reduction, there was no appreciable evidence of amyloid removal in patients with cardiac amyloidosis in this Phase 2 trial, potentially related to limited cardiac uptake of dezamizumab as demonstrated in the immuno-PET study. The benefit-risk assessment for dezamizumab in cardiac amyloidosis was considered unfavourable after the incidence of large-vessel vasculitis and development for this indication was terminated. Trial registration NCT03044353 (2 February 2017) and NCT03417830 (25 January 2018). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12872-021-02407-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8843022
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88430222022-02-16 Pharmacodynamic evaluation and safety assessment of treatment with antibodies to serum amyloid P component in patients with cardiac amyloidosis: an open-label Phase 2 study and an adjunctive immuno-PET imaging study Wechalekar, Ashutosh Antoni, Gunnar Al Azzam, Wasfi Bergström, Mats Biswas, Swethajit Chen, Chao Cheriyan, Joseph Cleveland, Matthew Cookson, Louise Galette, Paul Janiczek, Robert L. Kwong, Raymond Y. Lukas, Mary Ann Millns, Helen Richards, Duncan Schneider, Ian Solomon, Scott D. Sörensen, Jens Storey, James Thompson, Douglas van Dongen, Guus Vugts, Danielle J. Wall, Anders Wikström, Gerhard Falk, Rodney H. BMC Cardiovasc Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: In a Phase I study treatment with the serum amyloid P component (SAP) depleter miridesap followed by monoclonal antibody to SAP (dezamizumab) showed removal of amyloid from liver, spleen and kidney in patients with systemic amyloidosis. We report results from a Phase 2 study and concurrent immuno-positron emission tomography (PET) study assessing efficacy, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, safety and cardiac uptake (of dezamizumab) following the same intervention in patients with cardiac amyloidosis. METHODS: Both were uncontrolled open-label studies. After SAP depletion with miridesap, patients received ≤ 6 monthly doses of dezamizumab in the Phase 2 trial (n = 7), ≤ 2 doses of non-radiolabelled dezamizumab plus [(89)Zr]Zr-dezamizumab (total mass dose of 80 mg at session 1 and 500 mg at session 2) in the immuno-PET study (n = 2). Primary endpoints of the Phase 2 study were changed from baseline to follow-up (at 8 weeks) in left ventricular mass (LVM) by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and safety. Primary endpoint of the immuno-PET study was [(89)Zr]Zr-dezamizumab cardiac uptake assessed via PET. RESULTS: Dezamizumab produced no appreciable or consistent reduction in LVM nor improvement in cardiac function in the Phase 2 study. In the immuno-PET study, measurable cardiac uptake of [(89)Zr]Zr-dezamizumab, although seen in both patients, was moderate to low. Uptake was notably lower in the patient with higher LVM. Treatment-associated rash with cutaneous small-vessel vasculitis was observed in both studies. Abdominal large-vessel vasculitis after initial dezamizumab dosing (300 mg) occurred in the first patient with immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis enrolled in the Phase 2 study. Symptom resolution was nearly complete within 24 h of intravenous methylprednisolone and dezamizumab discontinuation; abdominal computed tomography imaging showed vasculitis resolution by 8 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike previous observations of visceral amyloid reduction, there was no appreciable evidence of amyloid removal in patients with cardiac amyloidosis in this Phase 2 trial, potentially related to limited cardiac uptake of dezamizumab as demonstrated in the immuno-PET study. The benefit-risk assessment for dezamizumab in cardiac amyloidosis was considered unfavourable after the incidence of large-vessel vasculitis and development for this indication was terminated. Trial registration NCT03044353 (2 February 2017) and NCT03417830 (25 January 2018). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12872-021-02407-6. BioMed Central 2022-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8843022/ /pubmed/35152886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-02407-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wechalekar, Ashutosh
Antoni, Gunnar
Al Azzam, Wasfi
Bergström, Mats
Biswas, Swethajit
Chen, Chao
Cheriyan, Joseph
Cleveland, Matthew
Cookson, Louise
Galette, Paul
Janiczek, Robert L.
Kwong, Raymond Y.
Lukas, Mary Ann
Millns, Helen
Richards, Duncan
Schneider, Ian
Solomon, Scott D.
Sörensen, Jens
Storey, James
Thompson, Douglas
van Dongen, Guus
Vugts, Danielle J.
Wall, Anders
Wikström, Gerhard
Falk, Rodney H.
Pharmacodynamic evaluation and safety assessment of treatment with antibodies to serum amyloid P component in patients with cardiac amyloidosis: an open-label Phase 2 study and an adjunctive immuno-PET imaging study
title Pharmacodynamic evaluation and safety assessment of treatment with antibodies to serum amyloid P component in patients with cardiac amyloidosis: an open-label Phase 2 study and an adjunctive immuno-PET imaging study
title_full Pharmacodynamic evaluation and safety assessment of treatment with antibodies to serum amyloid P component in patients with cardiac amyloidosis: an open-label Phase 2 study and an adjunctive immuno-PET imaging study
title_fullStr Pharmacodynamic evaluation and safety assessment of treatment with antibodies to serum amyloid P component in patients with cardiac amyloidosis: an open-label Phase 2 study and an adjunctive immuno-PET imaging study
title_full_unstemmed Pharmacodynamic evaluation and safety assessment of treatment with antibodies to serum amyloid P component in patients with cardiac amyloidosis: an open-label Phase 2 study and an adjunctive immuno-PET imaging study
title_short Pharmacodynamic evaluation and safety assessment of treatment with antibodies to serum amyloid P component in patients with cardiac amyloidosis: an open-label Phase 2 study and an adjunctive immuno-PET imaging study
title_sort pharmacodynamic evaluation and safety assessment of treatment with antibodies to serum amyloid p component in patients with cardiac amyloidosis: an open-label phase 2 study and an adjunctive immuno-pet imaging study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8843022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35152886
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-02407-6
work_keys_str_mv AT wechalekarashutosh pharmacodynamicevaluationandsafetyassessmentoftreatmentwithantibodiestoserumamyloidpcomponentinpatientswithcardiacamyloidosisanopenlabelphase2studyandanadjunctiveimmunopetimagingstudy
AT antonigunnar pharmacodynamicevaluationandsafetyassessmentoftreatmentwithantibodiestoserumamyloidpcomponentinpatientswithcardiacamyloidosisanopenlabelphase2studyandanadjunctiveimmunopetimagingstudy
AT alazzamwasfi pharmacodynamicevaluationandsafetyassessmentoftreatmentwithantibodiestoserumamyloidpcomponentinpatientswithcardiacamyloidosisanopenlabelphase2studyandanadjunctiveimmunopetimagingstudy
AT bergstrommats pharmacodynamicevaluationandsafetyassessmentoftreatmentwithantibodiestoserumamyloidpcomponentinpatientswithcardiacamyloidosisanopenlabelphase2studyandanadjunctiveimmunopetimagingstudy
AT biswasswethajit pharmacodynamicevaluationandsafetyassessmentoftreatmentwithantibodiestoserumamyloidpcomponentinpatientswithcardiacamyloidosisanopenlabelphase2studyandanadjunctiveimmunopetimagingstudy
AT chenchao pharmacodynamicevaluationandsafetyassessmentoftreatmentwithantibodiestoserumamyloidpcomponentinpatientswithcardiacamyloidosisanopenlabelphase2studyandanadjunctiveimmunopetimagingstudy
AT cheriyanjoseph pharmacodynamicevaluationandsafetyassessmentoftreatmentwithantibodiestoserumamyloidpcomponentinpatientswithcardiacamyloidosisanopenlabelphase2studyandanadjunctiveimmunopetimagingstudy
AT clevelandmatthew pharmacodynamicevaluationandsafetyassessmentoftreatmentwithantibodiestoserumamyloidpcomponentinpatientswithcardiacamyloidosisanopenlabelphase2studyandanadjunctiveimmunopetimagingstudy
AT cooksonlouise pharmacodynamicevaluationandsafetyassessmentoftreatmentwithantibodiestoserumamyloidpcomponentinpatientswithcardiacamyloidosisanopenlabelphase2studyandanadjunctiveimmunopetimagingstudy
AT galettepaul pharmacodynamicevaluationandsafetyassessmentoftreatmentwithantibodiestoserumamyloidpcomponentinpatientswithcardiacamyloidosisanopenlabelphase2studyandanadjunctiveimmunopetimagingstudy
AT janiczekrobertl pharmacodynamicevaluationandsafetyassessmentoftreatmentwithantibodiestoserumamyloidpcomponentinpatientswithcardiacamyloidosisanopenlabelphase2studyandanadjunctiveimmunopetimagingstudy
AT kwongraymondy pharmacodynamicevaluationandsafetyassessmentoftreatmentwithantibodiestoserumamyloidpcomponentinpatientswithcardiacamyloidosisanopenlabelphase2studyandanadjunctiveimmunopetimagingstudy
AT lukasmaryann pharmacodynamicevaluationandsafetyassessmentoftreatmentwithantibodiestoserumamyloidpcomponentinpatientswithcardiacamyloidosisanopenlabelphase2studyandanadjunctiveimmunopetimagingstudy
AT millnshelen pharmacodynamicevaluationandsafetyassessmentoftreatmentwithantibodiestoserumamyloidpcomponentinpatientswithcardiacamyloidosisanopenlabelphase2studyandanadjunctiveimmunopetimagingstudy
AT richardsduncan pharmacodynamicevaluationandsafetyassessmentoftreatmentwithantibodiestoserumamyloidpcomponentinpatientswithcardiacamyloidosisanopenlabelphase2studyandanadjunctiveimmunopetimagingstudy
AT schneiderian pharmacodynamicevaluationandsafetyassessmentoftreatmentwithantibodiestoserumamyloidpcomponentinpatientswithcardiacamyloidosisanopenlabelphase2studyandanadjunctiveimmunopetimagingstudy
AT solomonscottd pharmacodynamicevaluationandsafetyassessmentoftreatmentwithantibodiestoserumamyloidpcomponentinpatientswithcardiacamyloidosisanopenlabelphase2studyandanadjunctiveimmunopetimagingstudy
AT sorensenjens pharmacodynamicevaluationandsafetyassessmentoftreatmentwithantibodiestoserumamyloidpcomponentinpatientswithcardiacamyloidosisanopenlabelphase2studyandanadjunctiveimmunopetimagingstudy
AT storeyjames pharmacodynamicevaluationandsafetyassessmentoftreatmentwithantibodiestoserumamyloidpcomponentinpatientswithcardiacamyloidosisanopenlabelphase2studyandanadjunctiveimmunopetimagingstudy
AT thompsondouglas pharmacodynamicevaluationandsafetyassessmentoftreatmentwithantibodiestoserumamyloidpcomponentinpatientswithcardiacamyloidosisanopenlabelphase2studyandanadjunctiveimmunopetimagingstudy
AT vandongenguus pharmacodynamicevaluationandsafetyassessmentoftreatmentwithantibodiestoserumamyloidpcomponentinpatientswithcardiacamyloidosisanopenlabelphase2studyandanadjunctiveimmunopetimagingstudy
AT vugtsdaniellej pharmacodynamicevaluationandsafetyassessmentoftreatmentwithantibodiestoserumamyloidpcomponentinpatientswithcardiacamyloidosisanopenlabelphase2studyandanadjunctiveimmunopetimagingstudy
AT wallanders pharmacodynamicevaluationandsafetyassessmentoftreatmentwithantibodiestoserumamyloidpcomponentinpatientswithcardiacamyloidosisanopenlabelphase2studyandanadjunctiveimmunopetimagingstudy
AT wikstromgerhard pharmacodynamicevaluationandsafetyassessmentoftreatmentwithantibodiestoserumamyloidpcomponentinpatientswithcardiacamyloidosisanopenlabelphase2studyandanadjunctiveimmunopetimagingstudy
AT falkrodneyh pharmacodynamicevaluationandsafetyassessmentoftreatmentwithantibodiestoserumamyloidpcomponentinpatientswithcardiacamyloidosisanopenlabelphase2studyandanadjunctiveimmunopetimagingstudy