Cargando…

Assessing COVID-19 Health Information on Google Using the Quality Evaluation Scoring Tool (QUEST): Cross-sectional and Readability Analysis

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic spurred an increase in online information regarding disease spread and symptomatology. OBJECTIVE: Our purpose is to systematically assess the quality and readability of articles resulting from frequently Google-searched COVID-19 terms in the United States. METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bachu, Vismaya S, Mahjoub, Heba, Holler, Albert E, Crihalmeanu, Tudor, Bachu, Dheevena M, Ayyaswami, Varun, Parker, Pearman D, Prabhu, Arpan V
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8843082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34995206
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/32443
_version_ 1784651177589211136
author Bachu, Vismaya S
Mahjoub, Heba
Holler, Albert E
Crihalmeanu, Tudor
Bachu, Dheevena M
Ayyaswami, Varun
Parker, Pearman D
Prabhu, Arpan V
author_facet Bachu, Vismaya S
Mahjoub, Heba
Holler, Albert E
Crihalmeanu, Tudor
Bachu, Dheevena M
Ayyaswami, Varun
Parker, Pearman D
Prabhu, Arpan V
author_sort Bachu, Vismaya S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic spurred an increase in online information regarding disease spread and symptomatology. OBJECTIVE: Our purpose is to systematically assess the quality and readability of articles resulting from frequently Google-searched COVID-19 terms in the United States. METHODS: We used Google Trends to determine the 25 most commonly searched health-related phrases between February 29 and April 30, 2020. The first 30 search results for each term were collected, and articles were analyzed using the Quality Evaluation Scoring Tool (QUEST). Three raters scored each article in authorship, attribution, conflict of interest, currency, complementarity, and tone. A readability analysis was conducted. RESULTS: Exactly 709 articles were screened, and 195 fulfilled inclusion criteria. The mean article score was 18.4 (SD 2.6) of 28, with 7% (14/189) scoring in the top quartile. National news outlets published the largest share (70/189, 36%) of articles. Peer-reviewed journals attained the highest average QUEST score compared to national/regional news outlets, national/state government sites, and global health organizations (all P<.05). The average reading level was 11.7 (SD 1.9, range 5.4-16.9). Only 3 (1.6%) articles were written at the recommended sixth grade level. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19–related articles are vastly varied in their attributes and levels of bias, and would benefit from revisions for increased readability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8843082
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88430822022-03-10 Assessing COVID-19 Health Information on Google Using the Quality Evaluation Scoring Tool (QUEST): Cross-sectional and Readability Analysis Bachu, Vismaya S Mahjoub, Heba Holler, Albert E Crihalmeanu, Tudor Bachu, Dheevena M Ayyaswami, Varun Parker, Pearman D Prabhu, Arpan V JMIR Form Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic spurred an increase in online information regarding disease spread and symptomatology. OBJECTIVE: Our purpose is to systematically assess the quality and readability of articles resulting from frequently Google-searched COVID-19 terms in the United States. METHODS: We used Google Trends to determine the 25 most commonly searched health-related phrases between February 29 and April 30, 2020. The first 30 search results for each term were collected, and articles were analyzed using the Quality Evaluation Scoring Tool (QUEST). Three raters scored each article in authorship, attribution, conflict of interest, currency, complementarity, and tone. A readability analysis was conducted. RESULTS: Exactly 709 articles were screened, and 195 fulfilled inclusion criteria. The mean article score was 18.4 (SD 2.6) of 28, with 7% (14/189) scoring in the top quartile. National news outlets published the largest share (70/189, 36%) of articles. Peer-reviewed journals attained the highest average QUEST score compared to national/regional news outlets, national/state government sites, and global health organizations (all P<.05). The average reading level was 11.7 (SD 1.9, range 5.4-16.9). Only 3 (1.6%) articles were written at the recommended sixth grade level. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19–related articles are vastly varied in their attributes and levels of bias, and would benefit from revisions for increased readability. JMIR Publications 2022-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8843082/ /pubmed/34995206 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/32443 Text en ©Vismaya S Bachu, Heba Mahjoub, Albert E Holler, Tudor Crihalmeanu, Dheevena M Bachu, Varun Ayyaswami, Pearman D Parker, Arpan V Prabhu. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 11.02.2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Formative Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://formative.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Bachu, Vismaya S
Mahjoub, Heba
Holler, Albert E
Crihalmeanu, Tudor
Bachu, Dheevena M
Ayyaswami, Varun
Parker, Pearman D
Prabhu, Arpan V
Assessing COVID-19 Health Information on Google Using the Quality Evaluation Scoring Tool (QUEST): Cross-sectional and Readability Analysis
title Assessing COVID-19 Health Information on Google Using the Quality Evaluation Scoring Tool (QUEST): Cross-sectional and Readability Analysis
title_full Assessing COVID-19 Health Information on Google Using the Quality Evaluation Scoring Tool (QUEST): Cross-sectional and Readability Analysis
title_fullStr Assessing COVID-19 Health Information on Google Using the Quality Evaluation Scoring Tool (QUEST): Cross-sectional and Readability Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Assessing COVID-19 Health Information on Google Using the Quality Evaluation Scoring Tool (QUEST): Cross-sectional and Readability Analysis
title_short Assessing COVID-19 Health Information on Google Using the Quality Evaluation Scoring Tool (QUEST): Cross-sectional and Readability Analysis
title_sort assessing covid-19 health information on google using the quality evaluation scoring tool (quest): cross-sectional and readability analysis
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8843082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34995206
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/32443
work_keys_str_mv AT bachuvismayas assessingcovid19healthinformationongoogleusingthequalityevaluationscoringtoolquestcrosssectionalandreadabilityanalysis
AT mahjoubheba assessingcovid19healthinformationongoogleusingthequalityevaluationscoringtoolquestcrosssectionalandreadabilityanalysis
AT holleralberte assessingcovid19healthinformationongoogleusingthequalityevaluationscoringtoolquestcrosssectionalandreadabilityanalysis
AT crihalmeanutudor assessingcovid19healthinformationongoogleusingthequalityevaluationscoringtoolquestcrosssectionalandreadabilityanalysis
AT bachudheevenam assessingcovid19healthinformationongoogleusingthequalityevaluationscoringtoolquestcrosssectionalandreadabilityanalysis
AT ayyaswamivarun assessingcovid19healthinformationongoogleusingthequalityevaluationscoringtoolquestcrosssectionalandreadabilityanalysis
AT parkerpearmand assessingcovid19healthinformationongoogleusingthequalityevaluationscoringtoolquestcrosssectionalandreadabilityanalysis
AT prabhuarpanv assessingcovid19healthinformationongoogleusingthequalityevaluationscoringtoolquestcrosssectionalandreadabilityanalysis