Cargando…

Stakeholders’ perspectives on how to improve the support for persons with an intellectual disability and challenging behaviors: a concept mapping study

INTRODUCTION: People with an intellectual disability (ID) are at risk of developing challenging behavior. Although previous research provided important insights into how to support people with an ID and challenging behavior, it remains unclear what various stakeholders consider to be the most essent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nijs, S., Taminiau, E. F., Frielink, N., Embregts, P. J. C. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8843164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35173961
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2019.1690859
_version_ 1784651195338457088
author Nijs, S.
Taminiau, E. F.
Frielink, N.
Embregts, P. J. C. M.
author_facet Nijs, S.
Taminiau, E. F.
Frielink, N.
Embregts, P. J. C. M.
author_sort Nijs, S.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: People with an intellectual disability (ID) are at risk of developing challenging behavior. Although previous research provided important insights into how to support people with an ID and challenging behavior, it remains unclear what various stakeholders consider to be the most essential aspects to further improve their support. METHOD: Statements regarding aspects perceived necessary to improve the support to people with an ID and challenging behavior were collected in focus groups. Afterwards participants individually prioritized and clustered these statements, resulting in concept maps for people with an ID, direct support workers, and psychologists. Since only three relatives participated in the entire concept mapping procedure, no concept map could be composed based on their input. RESULTS: Participants generated 200 statements. In the concept map of clients, statements were mentioned regarding relational aspects, providing clarity and structure, characteristics of support staff, and professional attitude of direct support workers. Direct support workers provided statements related to their own personal competencies, the necessity of feeling supported and appreciated, and a physical safe environment. Psychologists provided statements regarding their support for direct support workers, the support for the clients, the perspective on the client, and their role as psychologists. CONCLUSION: The results of this study may be a starting point to foster increased evidence based practice for the support for persons with an ID and challenging behavior. Moreover, it provides opportunities to create care founded on mutual attunement, based on listening to each other’s ideas and insight into perspectives and needs of various stakeholders.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8843164
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88431642022-02-15 Stakeholders’ perspectives on how to improve the support for persons with an intellectual disability and challenging behaviors: a concept mapping study Nijs, S. Taminiau, E. F. Frielink, N. Embregts, P. J. C. M. Int J Dev Disabil Articles INTRODUCTION: People with an intellectual disability (ID) are at risk of developing challenging behavior. Although previous research provided important insights into how to support people with an ID and challenging behavior, it remains unclear what various stakeholders consider to be the most essential aspects to further improve their support. METHOD: Statements regarding aspects perceived necessary to improve the support to people with an ID and challenging behavior were collected in focus groups. Afterwards participants individually prioritized and clustered these statements, resulting in concept maps for people with an ID, direct support workers, and psychologists. Since only three relatives participated in the entire concept mapping procedure, no concept map could be composed based on their input. RESULTS: Participants generated 200 statements. In the concept map of clients, statements were mentioned regarding relational aspects, providing clarity and structure, characteristics of support staff, and professional attitude of direct support workers. Direct support workers provided statements related to their own personal competencies, the necessity of feeling supported and appreciated, and a physical safe environment. Psychologists provided statements regarding their support for direct support workers, the support for the clients, the perspective on the client, and their role as psychologists. CONCLUSION: The results of this study may be a starting point to foster increased evidence based practice for the support for persons with an ID and challenging behavior. Moreover, it provides opportunities to create care founded on mutual attunement, based on listening to each other’s ideas and insight into perspectives and needs of various stakeholders. Taylor & Francis 2019-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8843164/ /pubmed/35173961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2019.1690859 Text en © The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.
spellingShingle Articles
Nijs, S.
Taminiau, E. F.
Frielink, N.
Embregts, P. J. C. M.
Stakeholders’ perspectives on how to improve the support for persons with an intellectual disability and challenging behaviors: a concept mapping study
title Stakeholders’ perspectives on how to improve the support for persons with an intellectual disability and challenging behaviors: a concept mapping study
title_full Stakeholders’ perspectives on how to improve the support for persons with an intellectual disability and challenging behaviors: a concept mapping study
title_fullStr Stakeholders’ perspectives on how to improve the support for persons with an intellectual disability and challenging behaviors: a concept mapping study
title_full_unstemmed Stakeholders’ perspectives on how to improve the support for persons with an intellectual disability and challenging behaviors: a concept mapping study
title_short Stakeholders’ perspectives on how to improve the support for persons with an intellectual disability and challenging behaviors: a concept mapping study
title_sort stakeholders’ perspectives on how to improve the support for persons with an intellectual disability and challenging behaviors: a concept mapping study
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8843164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35173961
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2019.1690859
work_keys_str_mv AT nijss stakeholdersperspectivesonhowtoimprovethesupportforpersonswithanintellectualdisabilityandchallengingbehaviorsaconceptmappingstudy
AT taminiauef stakeholdersperspectivesonhowtoimprovethesupportforpersonswithanintellectualdisabilityandchallengingbehaviorsaconceptmappingstudy
AT frielinkn stakeholdersperspectivesonhowtoimprovethesupportforpersonswithanintellectualdisabilityandchallengingbehaviorsaconceptmappingstudy
AT embregtspjcm stakeholdersperspectivesonhowtoimprovethesupportforpersonswithanintellectualdisabilityandchallengingbehaviorsaconceptmappingstudy