Cargando…

A comparative evaluation of microleakage and dentin shear bond strength of three restorative materials

AIM: To evaluate the microleakage and dentin shear bond strength of two glass containing restorative materials, Zirconomer and Cention N, and to compare them with a conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC) (GC Fuji II). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Zirconomer (Shofu) and GC Fuji II (GC Corp.) are self-curi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kumari, Alpana, Singh, Namita
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8843194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35174335
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2022.2033623
_version_ 1784651202820046848
author Kumari, Alpana
Singh, Namita
author_facet Kumari, Alpana
Singh, Namita
author_sort Kumari, Alpana
collection PubMed
description AIM: To evaluate the microleakage and dentin shear bond strength of two glass containing restorative materials, Zirconomer and Cention N, and to compare them with a conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC) (GC Fuji II). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Zirconomer (Shofu) and GC Fuji II (GC Corp.) are self-curing GICs whereas Cention N (IvoclarVivadent) also offers a self-curing option as well as the option of light-curing using an adhesive. For evaluating microleakage, standardized class V cavities were prepared on the buccal surface of 30 premolars. The cavities were restored with one of the three restorative materials (n = 10) according to manufacturers’ instructions, Cention N being used with an adhesive (Te-EconomBond, IvoclarVivadent) and in the light-curing mode. After restoration and thermocycling, the microleakage assessment was made under a stereomicroscope at 40x magnification following immersing of the teeth in 0.5% methylene blue dye and buccolingual sectioning. For evaluating dentin shear bond strength, the occlusal surface of the 30 premolars was ground flat, and cylinders of the three restorative materials (n = 10) were bonded to the occlusal surface according to manufacturers’ instructions, Cention N being used with an adhesive (Te-EconomBond, IvoclarVivadent) and in the light-curing mode. Following 24-h storage at 100% humidity, the dentin shear bond strength was measured and the fracture mode was determined under a stereomicroscope at 10× magnification. Data were statistically analyzed using Mann–Whitney and Scheffé tests (p = .05). RESULTS: Cention N displayed significantly less microleakage than did Zirconomer and GC Fuji II at occlusal as well as the gingival margins. Dentin shear bond strength varied significantly between 5.15 and 9.89 MPa with Cention N showing the highest bond strength and GC Fuji II the lowest. CONCLUSION: In this in vitro evaluation, Cention N consistently performed better than the conventional GIC (GC Fuji II) as well as Zirconomer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8843194
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88431942022-02-15 A comparative evaluation of microleakage and dentin shear bond strength of three restorative materials Kumari, Alpana Singh, Namita Biomater Investig Dent Original Article AIM: To evaluate the microleakage and dentin shear bond strength of two glass containing restorative materials, Zirconomer and Cention N, and to compare them with a conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC) (GC Fuji II). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Zirconomer (Shofu) and GC Fuji II (GC Corp.) are self-curing GICs whereas Cention N (IvoclarVivadent) also offers a self-curing option as well as the option of light-curing using an adhesive. For evaluating microleakage, standardized class V cavities were prepared on the buccal surface of 30 premolars. The cavities were restored with one of the three restorative materials (n = 10) according to manufacturers’ instructions, Cention N being used with an adhesive (Te-EconomBond, IvoclarVivadent) and in the light-curing mode. After restoration and thermocycling, the microleakage assessment was made under a stereomicroscope at 40x magnification following immersing of the teeth in 0.5% methylene blue dye and buccolingual sectioning. For evaluating dentin shear bond strength, the occlusal surface of the 30 premolars was ground flat, and cylinders of the three restorative materials (n = 10) were bonded to the occlusal surface according to manufacturers’ instructions, Cention N being used with an adhesive (Te-EconomBond, IvoclarVivadent) and in the light-curing mode. Following 24-h storage at 100% humidity, the dentin shear bond strength was measured and the fracture mode was determined under a stereomicroscope at 10× magnification. Data were statistically analyzed using Mann–Whitney and Scheffé tests (p = .05). RESULTS: Cention N displayed significantly less microleakage than did Zirconomer and GC Fuji II at occlusal as well as the gingival margins. Dentin shear bond strength varied significantly between 5.15 and 9.89 MPa with Cention N showing the highest bond strength and GC Fuji II the lowest. CONCLUSION: In this in vitro evaluation, Cention N consistently performed better than the conventional GIC (GC Fuji II) as well as Zirconomer. Taylor & Francis 2022-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8843194/ /pubmed/35174335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2022.2033623 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kumari, Alpana
Singh, Namita
A comparative evaluation of microleakage and dentin shear bond strength of three restorative materials
title A comparative evaluation of microleakage and dentin shear bond strength of three restorative materials
title_full A comparative evaluation of microleakage and dentin shear bond strength of three restorative materials
title_fullStr A comparative evaluation of microleakage and dentin shear bond strength of three restorative materials
title_full_unstemmed A comparative evaluation of microleakage and dentin shear bond strength of three restorative materials
title_short A comparative evaluation of microleakage and dentin shear bond strength of three restorative materials
title_sort comparative evaluation of microleakage and dentin shear bond strength of three restorative materials
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8843194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35174335
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2022.2033623
work_keys_str_mv AT kumarialpana acomparativeevaluationofmicroleakageanddentinshearbondstrengthofthreerestorativematerials
AT singhnamita acomparativeevaluationofmicroleakageanddentinshearbondstrengthofthreerestorativematerials
AT kumarialpana comparativeevaluationofmicroleakageanddentinshearbondstrengthofthreerestorativematerials
AT singhnamita comparativeevaluationofmicroleakageanddentinshearbondstrengthofthreerestorativematerials