Cargando…

Pitfalls and technical errors in the first approach to neonates with anorectal malformations in a non-specialist context: can we do any better? A review from three Eastern African Centres

INTRODUCTION: In sub-Saharan Africa, Anorectal malformations (ARM) are the most frequent cause of neonatal obstruction. Referral to a Pediatric Surgeon is frequently delayed. The first treatment is often delivered at not specialist level and mismanagement may result. AIM: To study ARM patients refer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Calisti, Alessandro, Nugud, Faisal Abdelgalil, Belay, Kibreab, Mlawa, Agnes, Chiesa, Pierluigi Lelli
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Makerere Medical School 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8843297/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35222599
http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v21i3.45
_version_ 1784651225998819328
author Calisti, Alessandro
Nugud, Faisal Abdelgalil
Belay, Kibreab
Mlawa, Agnes
Chiesa, Pierluigi Lelli
author_facet Calisti, Alessandro
Nugud, Faisal Abdelgalil
Belay, Kibreab
Mlawa, Agnes
Chiesa, Pierluigi Lelli
author_sort Calisti, Alessandro
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: In sub-Saharan Africa, Anorectal malformations (ARM) are the most frequent cause of neonatal obstruction. Referral to a Pediatric Surgeon is frequently delayed. The first treatment is often delivered at not specialist level and mismanagement may result. AIM: To study ARM patients referred beyond neonatal period and managed at a non-specialist level. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and thirty patients were included (M/F ratio 63/67) among 144 admitted to three Eastern African Hospitals with Pediatric Surgical facilities. Demographics, type of anomaly, delay on referral, previous management, most commonly observed errors are reported. RESULTS: The Mean age at referral was 23 months (range five weeks – 23 years). Colostomy was the most frequent surgery (92 cases). Stomas often did not follow the recommended criteria. Ten per cent were not on the sigmoid, and 35% were not divided. “Loop” or “double-barrel” colostomies did not exclude the distal loop. Inverted (10,5%), prolapsed stomas (7,5%), short distal loop (16%) were observed. Twenty-four cases (26%) needed redo. Primary perineal exploration in eight patients resulted in incontinence. CONCLUSIONS: Investments on training practitioners, acting at District/Rural level, and closer links with tertiary centres are recommended to avoid ARM mismanagement and delayed referral to a Specialist.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8843297
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Makerere Medical School
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88432972022-02-24 Pitfalls and technical errors in the first approach to neonates with anorectal malformations in a non-specialist context: can we do any better? A review from three Eastern African Centres Calisti, Alessandro Nugud, Faisal Abdelgalil Belay, Kibreab Mlawa, Agnes Chiesa, Pierluigi Lelli Afr Health Sci Articles INTRODUCTION: In sub-Saharan Africa, Anorectal malformations (ARM) are the most frequent cause of neonatal obstruction. Referral to a Pediatric Surgeon is frequently delayed. The first treatment is often delivered at not specialist level and mismanagement may result. AIM: To study ARM patients referred beyond neonatal period and managed at a non-specialist level. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and thirty patients were included (M/F ratio 63/67) among 144 admitted to three Eastern African Hospitals with Pediatric Surgical facilities. Demographics, type of anomaly, delay on referral, previous management, most commonly observed errors are reported. RESULTS: The Mean age at referral was 23 months (range five weeks – 23 years). Colostomy was the most frequent surgery (92 cases). Stomas often did not follow the recommended criteria. Ten per cent were not on the sigmoid, and 35% were not divided. “Loop” or “double-barrel” colostomies did not exclude the distal loop. Inverted (10,5%), prolapsed stomas (7,5%), short distal loop (16%) were observed. Twenty-four cases (26%) needed redo. Primary perineal exploration in eight patients resulted in incontinence. CONCLUSIONS: Investments on training practitioners, acting at District/Rural level, and closer links with tertiary centres are recommended to avoid ARM mismanagement and delayed referral to a Specialist. Makerere Medical School 2021-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8843297/ /pubmed/35222599 http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v21i3.45 Text en © 2021 Calisti A et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee African Health Sciences. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles
Calisti, Alessandro
Nugud, Faisal Abdelgalil
Belay, Kibreab
Mlawa, Agnes
Chiesa, Pierluigi Lelli
Pitfalls and technical errors in the first approach to neonates with anorectal malformations in a non-specialist context: can we do any better? A review from three Eastern African Centres
title Pitfalls and technical errors in the first approach to neonates with anorectal malformations in a non-specialist context: can we do any better? A review from three Eastern African Centres
title_full Pitfalls and technical errors in the first approach to neonates with anorectal malformations in a non-specialist context: can we do any better? A review from three Eastern African Centres
title_fullStr Pitfalls and technical errors in the first approach to neonates with anorectal malformations in a non-specialist context: can we do any better? A review from three Eastern African Centres
title_full_unstemmed Pitfalls and technical errors in the first approach to neonates with anorectal malformations in a non-specialist context: can we do any better? A review from three Eastern African Centres
title_short Pitfalls and technical errors in the first approach to neonates with anorectal malformations in a non-specialist context: can we do any better? A review from three Eastern African Centres
title_sort pitfalls and technical errors in the first approach to neonates with anorectal malformations in a non-specialist context: can we do any better? a review from three eastern african centres
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8843297/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35222599
http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v21i3.45
work_keys_str_mv AT calistialessandro pitfallsandtechnicalerrorsinthefirstapproachtoneonateswithanorectalmalformationsinanonspecialistcontextcanwedoanybetterareviewfromthreeeasternafricancentres
AT nugudfaisalabdelgalil pitfallsandtechnicalerrorsinthefirstapproachtoneonateswithanorectalmalformationsinanonspecialistcontextcanwedoanybetterareviewfromthreeeasternafricancentres
AT belaykibreab pitfallsandtechnicalerrorsinthefirstapproachtoneonateswithanorectalmalformationsinanonspecialistcontextcanwedoanybetterareviewfromthreeeasternafricancentres
AT mlawaagnes pitfallsandtechnicalerrorsinthefirstapproachtoneonateswithanorectalmalformationsinanonspecialistcontextcanwedoanybetterareviewfromthreeeasternafricancentres
AT chiesapierluigilelli pitfallsandtechnicalerrorsinthefirstapproachtoneonateswithanorectalmalformationsinanonspecialistcontextcanwedoanybetterareviewfromthreeeasternafricancentres