Cargando…
Multicenter Retrospective Review of Ketamine Use in the ICU
IMPORTANCE: The response of ICU patients to continuously infused ketamine when it is used for analgesia and/or sedation remains poorly established. OBJECTIVES: To describe continuous infusion (CI) ketamine use in critically ill patients, including indications, dose and duration, adverse effects, pat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8843366/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35187497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000633 |
_version_ | 1784651240981921792 |
---|---|
author | Groth, Christine M. Droege, Christopher A. Connor, Kathryn A. Kaukeinen, Kimberly Acquisto, Nicole M. Chui, Sai Ho J. Cucci, Michaelia D. Dixit, Deepali Flannery, Alexander H. Gustafson, Kyle A. Glass, Nina E. Horng, Helen Heavner, Mojdeh S. Kinney, Justin Kruer, Rachel M. Peppard, William J. Sarangarm, Preeyaporn Sikora, Andrea Viswesh, Velliyur Erstad, Brian L. |
author_facet | Groth, Christine M. Droege, Christopher A. Connor, Kathryn A. Kaukeinen, Kimberly Acquisto, Nicole M. Chui, Sai Ho J. Cucci, Michaelia D. Dixit, Deepali Flannery, Alexander H. Gustafson, Kyle A. Glass, Nina E. Horng, Helen Heavner, Mojdeh S. Kinney, Justin Kruer, Rachel M. Peppard, William J. Sarangarm, Preeyaporn Sikora, Andrea Viswesh, Velliyur Erstad, Brian L. |
author_sort | Groth, Christine M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | IMPORTANCE: The response of ICU patients to continuously infused ketamine when it is used for analgesia and/or sedation remains poorly established. OBJECTIVES: To describe continuous infusion (CI) ketamine use in critically ill patients, including indications, dose and duration, adverse effects, patient outcomes, time in goal pain/sedation score range, exposure to analgesics/sedatives, and delirium. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Multicenter, retrospective, observational study from twenty-five diverse institutions in the United States. Patients receiving CI ketamine between January 2014 and December 2017. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Chart review evaluating institutional and patient demographics, ketamine indication, dose, administration, and adverse effects. Pain/sedation scores, cumulative doses of sedatives and analgesics, and delirium screenings in the 24 hours prior to ketamine were compared with those at 0–24 hours and 25–48 hours after. RESULTS: A total of 390 patients were included (median age, 54.5 yr; interquartile range, 39–65 yr; 61% males). Primary ICU types were medical (35.3%), surgical (23.3%), and trauma (17.7%). Most common indications were analgesia/sedation (n = 357, 91.5%). Starting doses were 0.2 mg/kg/hr (0.1–0.5 mg/kg/hr) and continued for 1.6 days (0.6–2.9 d). Hemodynamics in the first 4 hours after ketamine were variable (hypertension 24.0%, hypotension 23.5%, tachycardia 19.5%, bradycardia 2.3%); other adverse effects were minimal. Compared with 24 hours prior, there was a significant increase in proportion of time spent within goal pain score after ketamine initiation (24 hr prior: 68.9% [66.7–72.6%], 0–24 hr: 78.6% [74.3–82.5%], 25–48 hr: 80.3% [74.6–84.3%]; p < 0.001) and time spent within goal sedation score (24 hr prior: 57.1% [52.5–60.0%], 0–24 hr: 64.1% [60.7–67.2%], 25–48 hr: 68.9% [65.5–79.5%]; p < 0.001). There was also a significant reduction in IV morphine (mg) equivalents (24 hr prior: 120 [25–400], 0–24 hr: 118 [10–363], 25–48 hr: 80 [5–328]; p < 0.005), midazolam (mg) equivalents (24 hr prior: 11 [4–67], 0–24 hr: 6 [0–68], 25–48 hr: 3 [0–57]; p < 0.001), propofol (mg) (24 hr prior: 942 [223–4,018], 0–24 hr: 160 [0–2,776], 25–48 hr: 0 [0–1,859]; p < 0.001), and dexmedetomidine (µg) (24 hr prior: 1,025 [276–1,925], 0–24 hr: 285 [0–1,283], 25–48 hr: 0 [0–826]; p < 0.001). There was no difference in proportion of time spent positive for delirium (24 hr prior: 43.0% [17.0–47.0%], 0–24 hr: 39.5% [27.0–43.8%], 25–48 hr: 0% [0–43.7%]; p = 0.233). Limitations to these data include lack of a comparator group, potential for confounders and selection bias, and varying pain and sedation practices that may have changed since completion of the study. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: There is variability in the use of CI ketamine. Hemodynamic instability was the most common adverse effect. In the 48 hours after ketamine initiation compared with the 24 hours prior, proportion of time spent in goal pain/sedation score range increased and exposure to other analgesics/sedatives decreased. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8843366 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88433662022-02-18 Multicenter Retrospective Review of Ketamine Use in the ICU Groth, Christine M. Droege, Christopher A. Connor, Kathryn A. Kaukeinen, Kimberly Acquisto, Nicole M. Chui, Sai Ho J. Cucci, Michaelia D. Dixit, Deepali Flannery, Alexander H. Gustafson, Kyle A. Glass, Nina E. Horng, Helen Heavner, Mojdeh S. Kinney, Justin Kruer, Rachel M. Peppard, William J. Sarangarm, Preeyaporn Sikora, Andrea Viswesh, Velliyur Erstad, Brian L. Crit Care Explor Observational Study IMPORTANCE: The response of ICU patients to continuously infused ketamine when it is used for analgesia and/or sedation remains poorly established. OBJECTIVES: To describe continuous infusion (CI) ketamine use in critically ill patients, including indications, dose and duration, adverse effects, patient outcomes, time in goal pain/sedation score range, exposure to analgesics/sedatives, and delirium. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Multicenter, retrospective, observational study from twenty-five diverse institutions in the United States. Patients receiving CI ketamine between January 2014 and December 2017. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Chart review evaluating institutional and patient demographics, ketamine indication, dose, administration, and adverse effects. Pain/sedation scores, cumulative doses of sedatives and analgesics, and delirium screenings in the 24 hours prior to ketamine were compared with those at 0–24 hours and 25–48 hours after. RESULTS: A total of 390 patients were included (median age, 54.5 yr; interquartile range, 39–65 yr; 61% males). Primary ICU types were medical (35.3%), surgical (23.3%), and trauma (17.7%). Most common indications were analgesia/sedation (n = 357, 91.5%). Starting doses were 0.2 mg/kg/hr (0.1–0.5 mg/kg/hr) and continued for 1.6 days (0.6–2.9 d). Hemodynamics in the first 4 hours after ketamine were variable (hypertension 24.0%, hypotension 23.5%, tachycardia 19.5%, bradycardia 2.3%); other adverse effects were minimal. Compared with 24 hours prior, there was a significant increase in proportion of time spent within goal pain score after ketamine initiation (24 hr prior: 68.9% [66.7–72.6%], 0–24 hr: 78.6% [74.3–82.5%], 25–48 hr: 80.3% [74.6–84.3%]; p < 0.001) and time spent within goal sedation score (24 hr prior: 57.1% [52.5–60.0%], 0–24 hr: 64.1% [60.7–67.2%], 25–48 hr: 68.9% [65.5–79.5%]; p < 0.001). There was also a significant reduction in IV morphine (mg) equivalents (24 hr prior: 120 [25–400], 0–24 hr: 118 [10–363], 25–48 hr: 80 [5–328]; p < 0.005), midazolam (mg) equivalents (24 hr prior: 11 [4–67], 0–24 hr: 6 [0–68], 25–48 hr: 3 [0–57]; p < 0.001), propofol (mg) (24 hr prior: 942 [223–4,018], 0–24 hr: 160 [0–2,776], 25–48 hr: 0 [0–1,859]; p < 0.001), and dexmedetomidine (µg) (24 hr prior: 1,025 [276–1,925], 0–24 hr: 285 [0–1,283], 25–48 hr: 0 [0–826]; p < 0.001). There was no difference in proportion of time spent positive for delirium (24 hr prior: 43.0% [17.0–47.0%], 0–24 hr: 39.5% [27.0–43.8%], 25–48 hr: 0% [0–43.7%]; p = 0.233). Limitations to these data include lack of a comparator group, potential for confounders and selection bias, and varying pain and sedation practices that may have changed since completion of the study. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: There is variability in the use of CI ketamine. Hemodynamic instability was the most common adverse effect. In the 48 hours after ketamine initiation compared with the 24 hours prior, proportion of time spent in goal pain/sedation score range increased and exposure to other analgesics/sedatives decreased. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8843366/ /pubmed/35187497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000633 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Observational Study Groth, Christine M. Droege, Christopher A. Connor, Kathryn A. Kaukeinen, Kimberly Acquisto, Nicole M. Chui, Sai Ho J. Cucci, Michaelia D. Dixit, Deepali Flannery, Alexander H. Gustafson, Kyle A. Glass, Nina E. Horng, Helen Heavner, Mojdeh S. Kinney, Justin Kruer, Rachel M. Peppard, William J. Sarangarm, Preeyaporn Sikora, Andrea Viswesh, Velliyur Erstad, Brian L. Multicenter Retrospective Review of Ketamine Use in the ICU |
title | Multicenter Retrospective Review of Ketamine Use in the ICU |
title_full | Multicenter Retrospective Review of Ketamine Use in the ICU |
title_fullStr | Multicenter Retrospective Review of Ketamine Use in the ICU |
title_full_unstemmed | Multicenter Retrospective Review of Ketamine Use in the ICU |
title_short | Multicenter Retrospective Review of Ketamine Use in the ICU |
title_sort | multicenter retrospective review of ketamine use in the icu |
topic | Observational Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8843366/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35187497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000633 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grothchristinem multicenterretrospectivereviewofketamineuseintheicu AT droegechristophera multicenterretrospectivereviewofketamineuseintheicu AT connorkathryna multicenterretrospectivereviewofketamineuseintheicu AT kaukeinenkimberly multicenterretrospectivereviewofketamineuseintheicu AT acquistonicolem multicenterretrospectivereviewofketamineuseintheicu AT chuisaihoj multicenterretrospectivereviewofketamineuseintheicu AT cuccimichaeliad multicenterretrospectivereviewofketamineuseintheicu AT dixitdeepali multicenterretrospectivereviewofketamineuseintheicu AT flanneryalexanderh multicenterretrospectivereviewofketamineuseintheicu AT gustafsonkylea multicenterretrospectivereviewofketamineuseintheicu AT glassninae multicenterretrospectivereviewofketamineuseintheicu AT hornghelen multicenterretrospectivereviewofketamineuseintheicu AT heavnermojdehs multicenterretrospectivereviewofketamineuseintheicu AT kinneyjustin multicenterretrospectivereviewofketamineuseintheicu AT kruerrachelm multicenterretrospectivereviewofketamineuseintheicu AT peppardwilliamj multicenterretrospectivereviewofketamineuseintheicu AT sarangarmpreeyaporn multicenterretrospectivereviewofketamineuseintheicu AT sikoraandrea multicenterretrospectivereviewofketamineuseintheicu AT visweshvelliyur multicenterretrospectivereviewofketamineuseintheicu AT erstadbrianl multicenterretrospectivereviewofketamineuseintheicu |