Cargando…

Accuracy of Six Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Screening Questionnaires in the Chinese Population

PURPOSE: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is under diagnosis in China. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of six COPD screening questionnaires for the early detection of COPD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We recruited patients aged ≥35 years, presenting at the First Affiliated Hospital o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Jiawei, Yu, Na, Li, Xiaomeng, Wang, Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8843418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35177900
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S341648
_version_ 1784651250488311808
author Zhou, Jiawei
Yu, Na
Li, Xiaomeng
Wang, Wei
author_facet Zhou, Jiawei
Yu, Na
Li, Xiaomeng
Wang, Wei
author_sort Zhou, Jiawei
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is under diagnosis in China. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of six COPD screening questionnaires for the early detection of COPD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We recruited patients aged ≥35 years, presenting at the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University in 2021. All participants completed the COPD Diagnostic Questionnaire (CDQ), Revised COPD Diagnostic Questionnaire (Revised-CDQ), COPD Population Screener (COPD-PS), COPD Screening Questionnaire (COPD-SQ), COPD Assessment in Primary Care to Identify Undiagnosed Respiratory Disease and Exacerbation Risk (CAPTURE), and Lung Function Questionnaire (LFQ). The patients underwent spirometry testing with further bronchodilator testing for those with FEV(1)/FVC values of <0.70. Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) were drawn for each questionnaire. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive (PPV), negative predictive (NPV), and area under the curve (AUC) values of the optimal cut-off and previously reported scores were estimated and compared. RESULTS: Of 909 patients who completed the six screening questionnaires and spirometry testing, 330 patients were newly diagnosed with COPD. AUC values for the LFQ, Revised CDQ, COPD-PS, CDQ, COPD-SQ, and CAPTURE were 0.785 (95% confidence interval: 0.752–0.812), 0.762 (0.727–0.795), 0.745 (0.707–0.778), 0.731 (0.695–0.762), 0.703 (0.671–0.734), and 0.667 (0.635–0.702), respectively. The optimal cut-off scores for CDQ, Revised-CDQ, COPD-PS, COPD-SQ, CAPTURE, and LFQ were: 19, 19, 5, 17, 3, and 16 points, respectively. Compared with the previously recommended values, the present cut-off values for the CAPTURE and LFQ had better screening accuracy. The LFQ performed better than the CDQ, COPD-SQ, or CAPTURE. The Revised CDQ performed better than CAPTURE or COPD-SQ. The COPD-PS performed better than CAPTURE. CONCLUSION: All six questionnaires can discriminate between subjects with or without COPD. The LFQ performed particularly well. The CAPTURE and LFQ scores of 3 and 16 have better screening accuracy than the scores previously reported.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8843418
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88434182022-02-16 Accuracy of Six Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Screening Questionnaires in the Chinese Population Zhou, Jiawei Yu, Na Li, Xiaomeng Wang, Wei Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Original Research PURPOSE: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is under diagnosis in China. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of six COPD screening questionnaires for the early detection of COPD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We recruited patients aged ≥35 years, presenting at the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University in 2021. All participants completed the COPD Diagnostic Questionnaire (CDQ), Revised COPD Diagnostic Questionnaire (Revised-CDQ), COPD Population Screener (COPD-PS), COPD Screening Questionnaire (COPD-SQ), COPD Assessment in Primary Care to Identify Undiagnosed Respiratory Disease and Exacerbation Risk (CAPTURE), and Lung Function Questionnaire (LFQ). The patients underwent spirometry testing with further bronchodilator testing for those with FEV(1)/FVC values of <0.70. Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) were drawn for each questionnaire. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive (PPV), negative predictive (NPV), and area under the curve (AUC) values of the optimal cut-off and previously reported scores were estimated and compared. RESULTS: Of 909 patients who completed the six screening questionnaires and spirometry testing, 330 patients were newly diagnosed with COPD. AUC values for the LFQ, Revised CDQ, COPD-PS, CDQ, COPD-SQ, and CAPTURE were 0.785 (95% confidence interval: 0.752–0.812), 0.762 (0.727–0.795), 0.745 (0.707–0.778), 0.731 (0.695–0.762), 0.703 (0.671–0.734), and 0.667 (0.635–0.702), respectively. The optimal cut-off scores for CDQ, Revised-CDQ, COPD-PS, COPD-SQ, CAPTURE, and LFQ were: 19, 19, 5, 17, 3, and 16 points, respectively. Compared with the previously recommended values, the present cut-off values for the CAPTURE and LFQ had better screening accuracy. The LFQ performed better than the CDQ, COPD-SQ, or CAPTURE. The Revised CDQ performed better than CAPTURE or COPD-SQ. The COPD-PS performed better than CAPTURE. CONCLUSION: All six questionnaires can discriminate between subjects with or without COPD. The LFQ performed particularly well. The CAPTURE and LFQ scores of 3 and 16 have better screening accuracy than the scores previously reported. Dove 2022-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8843418/ /pubmed/35177900 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S341648 Text en © 2022 Zhou et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Zhou, Jiawei
Yu, Na
Li, Xiaomeng
Wang, Wei
Accuracy of Six Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Screening Questionnaires in the Chinese Population
title Accuracy of Six Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Screening Questionnaires in the Chinese Population
title_full Accuracy of Six Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Screening Questionnaires in the Chinese Population
title_fullStr Accuracy of Six Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Screening Questionnaires in the Chinese Population
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of Six Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Screening Questionnaires in the Chinese Population
title_short Accuracy of Six Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Screening Questionnaires in the Chinese Population
title_sort accuracy of six chronic obstructive pulmonary disease screening questionnaires in the chinese population
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8843418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35177900
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S341648
work_keys_str_mv AT zhoujiawei accuracyofsixchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasescreeningquestionnairesinthechinesepopulation
AT yuna accuracyofsixchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasescreeningquestionnairesinthechinesepopulation
AT lixiaomeng accuracyofsixchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasescreeningquestionnairesinthechinesepopulation
AT wangwei accuracyofsixchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasescreeningquestionnairesinthechinesepopulation