Cargando…

Evaluation of YouTube Videos as a Source of Patient Information for Ureteric Stent Placement: A Quality Assessment Study

OBJECTIVE: To assess the quality of YouTube videos on ureteric stent placement (USP) as a source of patient available. METHODS: YouTube was searched using search terms “DJ stenting,” “Double J stenting,” and “ureteric stenting.” The initial 100 videos displayed with each of the above mentioned searc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chaudhary, Kapil, Chandna, Abhishek, Kumar Devana, Sudheer, Sharma, Aditya Prakash, Tyagi, Shantanu, Singh, Shrawan K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8843829/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35178426
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.816222
_version_ 1784651349120516096
author Chaudhary, Kapil
Chandna, Abhishek
Kumar Devana, Sudheer
Sharma, Aditya Prakash
Tyagi, Shantanu
Singh, Shrawan K.
author_facet Chaudhary, Kapil
Chandna, Abhishek
Kumar Devana, Sudheer
Sharma, Aditya Prakash
Tyagi, Shantanu
Singh, Shrawan K.
author_sort Chaudhary, Kapil
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the quality of YouTube videos on ureteric stent placement (USP) as a source of patient available. METHODS: YouTube was searched using search terms “DJ stenting,” “Double J stenting,” and “ureteric stenting.” The initial 100 videos displayed with each of the above mentioned search terms were scrutinized. The selected videos reviewed by 3 independent consultant urologists against a pre-agreed scoring system based upon European Association of Urology (EAU) patient information sheet on ureteric stent placement. The videos were scored qualitatively and quantitatively based on the scores achieved in various domains of the scoring Performa. Data was also collected for the number of views, likes, dislikes, and time duration of each video. RESULTS: A total of 22 videos which fulfilled the inclusion criteria were reviewed. All the videos were uploaded by healthcare organizations or healthcare websites. None of the videos were classified as “Good” based on reviewer scores and only one video was classified as “acceptable.” Fourteen videos were classified as “very poor” with a score of <5/20. General information about stents was described by majority of the studies whilst preoperative information, procedure description, danger signs, and follow up were scarcely described by most videos. CONCLUSION: Majority of YouTube videos on USP are of poor overall quality and lack pertinent information. This calls for creation of comprehensive and unbiased videos for patient information on USP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8843829
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88438292022-02-16 Evaluation of YouTube Videos as a Source of Patient Information for Ureteric Stent Placement: A Quality Assessment Study Chaudhary, Kapil Chandna, Abhishek Kumar Devana, Sudheer Sharma, Aditya Prakash Tyagi, Shantanu Singh, Shrawan K. Front Surg Surgery OBJECTIVE: To assess the quality of YouTube videos on ureteric stent placement (USP) as a source of patient available. METHODS: YouTube was searched using search terms “DJ stenting,” “Double J stenting,” and “ureteric stenting.” The initial 100 videos displayed with each of the above mentioned search terms were scrutinized. The selected videos reviewed by 3 independent consultant urologists against a pre-agreed scoring system based upon European Association of Urology (EAU) patient information sheet on ureteric stent placement. The videos were scored qualitatively and quantitatively based on the scores achieved in various domains of the scoring Performa. Data was also collected for the number of views, likes, dislikes, and time duration of each video. RESULTS: A total of 22 videos which fulfilled the inclusion criteria were reviewed. All the videos were uploaded by healthcare organizations or healthcare websites. None of the videos were classified as “Good” based on reviewer scores and only one video was classified as “acceptable.” Fourteen videos were classified as “very poor” with a score of <5/20. General information about stents was described by majority of the studies whilst preoperative information, procedure description, danger signs, and follow up were scarcely described by most videos. CONCLUSION: Majority of YouTube videos on USP are of poor overall quality and lack pertinent information. This calls for creation of comprehensive and unbiased videos for patient information on USP. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8843829/ /pubmed/35178426 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.816222 Text en Copyright © 2022 Chaudhary, Chandna, Kumar Devana, Sharma, Tyagi and Singh. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Chaudhary, Kapil
Chandna, Abhishek
Kumar Devana, Sudheer
Sharma, Aditya Prakash
Tyagi, Shantanu
Singh, Shrawan K.
Evaluation of YouTube Videos as a Source of Patient Information for Ureteric Stent Placement: A Quality Assessment Study
title Evaluation of YouTube Videos as a Source of Patient Information for Ureteric Stent Placement: A Quality Assessment Study
title_full Evaluation of YouTube Videos as a Source of Patient Information for Ureteric Stent Placement: A Quality Assessment Study
title_fullStr Evaluation of YouTube Videos as a Source of Patient Information for Ureteric Stent Placement: A Quality Assessment Study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of YouTube Videos as a Source of Patient Information for Ureteric Stent Placement: A Quality Assessment Study
title_short Evaluation of YouTube Videos as a Source of Patient Information for Ureteric Stent Placement: A Quality Assessment Study
title_sort evaluation of youtube videos as a source of patient information for ureteric stent placement: a quality assessment study
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8843829/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35178426
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.816222
work_keys_str_mv AT chaudharykapil evaluationofyoutubevideosasasourceofpatientinformationforuretericstentplacementaqualityassessmentstudy
AT chandnaabhishek evaluationofyoutubevideosasasourceofpatientinformationforuretericstentplacementaqualityassessmentstudy
AT kumardevanasudheer evaluationofyoutubevideosasasourceofpatientinformationforuretericstentplacementaqualityassessmentstudy
AT sharmaadityaprakash evaluationofyoutubevideosasasourceofpatientinformationforuretericstentplacementaqualityassessmentstudy
AT tyagishantanu evaluationofyoutubevideosasasourceofpatientinformationforuretericstentplacementaqualityassessmentstudy
AT singhshrawank evaluationofyoutubevideosasasourceofpatientinformationforuretericstentplacementaqualityassessmentstudy