Cargando…

Pacemaker lead rupture in a patient with subacute endocarditis: a case report

BACKGROUND: Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED)-related infections are associated with severe morbidity and mortality. Few cases have previously documented both lead endocarditis and lead rupture simultaneously. CASE SUMMARY: We describe the case of a 73-year-old man with a dual-chamber pac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Caratti di Lanzacco, Lorenzo, Wauters, Aurélien
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8843865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35174311
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjcr/ytac054
_version_ 1784651357740859392
author Caratti di Lanzacco, Lorenzo
Wauters, Aurélien
author_facet Caratti di Lanzacco, Lorenzo
Wauters, Aurélien
author_sort Caratti di Lanzacco, Lorenzo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED)-related infections are associated with severe morbidity and mortality. Few cases have previously documented both lead endocarditis and lead rupture simultaneously. CASE SUMMARY: We describe the case of a 73-year-old man with a dual-chamber pacemaker presenting with subacute endocarditis and recurrent cholangitis. A few months prior, the patient was diagnosed with localized colon cancer and Streptococcus sanguinis lead endocarditis based on nuclear imaging. He was given prolonged antibiotic therapy and lead explantation was to be performed after sigmoidectomy. During the following weeks, his condition worsened and he was readmitted for biliary sepsis. A chest X-ray revealed, incidentally, a complete ventricular lead rupture. Pacemaker electrogram showed ventricular undersensing, loss of ventricular capture, and high impedance. As his health declined, removal of the pacemaker was deemed unreasonable and the patient died of biliary sepsis in the next few weeks. DISCUSSION: We describe the case of an asymptomatic intracardiac lead fracture in the setting of colon cancer and a medically managed Streptococcus lead infection. As this complication occurred during lead infection, bacterial damage may have weakened the lead over time. As illustrated by the patient’s outcomes, long-term antibiotic therapy should only be used in cases unsuitable for device removal. Complete hardware removal remains the first-line therapy in patients with CIED-related infections.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8843865
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88438652022-02-15 Pacemaker lead rupture in a patient with subacute endocarditis: a case report Caratti di Lanzacco, Lorenzo Wauters, Aurélien Eur Heart J Case Rep Case Report BACKGROUND: Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED)-related infections are associated with severe morbidity and mortality. Few cases have previously documented both lead endocarditis and lead rupture simultaneously. CASE SUMMARY: We describe the case of a 73-year-old man with a dual-chamber pacemaker presenting with subacute endocarditis and recurrent cholangitis. A few months prior, the patient was diagnosed with localized colon cancer and Streptococcus sanguinis lead endocarditis based on nuclear imaging. He was given prolonged antibiotic therapy and lead explantation was to be performed after sigmoidectomy. During the following weeks, his condition worsened and he was readmitted for biliary sepsis. A chest X-ray revealed, incidentally, a complete ventricular lead rupture. Pacemaker electrogram showed ventricular undersensing, loss of ventricular capture, and high impedance. As his health declined, removal of the pacemaker was deemed unreasonable and the patient died of biliary sepsis in the next few weeks. DISCUSSION: We describe the case of an asymptomatic intracardiac lead fracture in the setting of colon cancer and a medically managed Streptococcus lead infection. As this complication occurred during lead infection, bacterial damage may have weakened the lead over time. As illustrated by the patient’s outcomes, long-term antibiotic therapy should only be used in cases unsuitable for device removal. Complete hardware removal remains the first-line therapy in patients with CIED-related infections. Oxford University Press 2022-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8843865/ /pubmed/35174311 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjcr/ytac054 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Case Report
Caratti di Lanzacco, Lorenzo
Wauters, Aurélien
Pacemaker lead rupture in a patient with subacute endocarditis: a case report
title Pacemaker lead rupture in a patient with subacute endocarditis: a case report
title_full Pacemaker lead rupture in a patient with subacute endocarditis: a case report
title_fullStr Pacemaker lead rupture in a patient with subacute endocarditis: a case report
title_full_unstemmed Pacemaker lead rupture in a patient with subacute endocarditis: a case report
title_short Pacemaker lead rupture in a patient with subacute endocarditis: a case report
title_sort pacemaker lead rupture in a patient with subacute endocarditis: a case report
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8843865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35174311
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjcr/ytac054
work_keys_str_mv AT carattidilanzaccolorenzo pacemakerleadruptureinapatientwithsubacuteendocarditisacasereport
AT wautersaurelien pacemakerleadruptureinapatientwithsubacuteendocarditisacasereport