Cargando…

Feasibility and Safety of Office-Based Transnasal Balloon Dilation for Neopharyngeal and Proximal Esophageal Strictures in Patients with a History of Head and Neck Carcinoma

The aim of this study was to assess feasibility and safety of office-based transnasal balloon dilation of neopharyngeal and proximal esophageal strictures in patients with a history of head and neck carcinoma. The secondary objective was to explore its effectiveness. This prospective case series inc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schimberg, Anouk S., Wellenstein, David J., Schutte, Henrieke W., Honings, J., Marres, Henri A. M., Takes, Robert P., van den Broek, Guido B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8844154/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33689024
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00455-021-10253-z
_version_ 1784651418136739840
author Schimberg, Anouk S.
Wellenstein, David J.
Schutte, Henrieke W.
Honings, J.
Marres, Henri A. M.
Takes, Robert P.
van den Broek, Guido B.
author_facet Schimberg, Anouk S.
Wellenstein, David J.
Schutte, Henrieke W.
Honings, J.
Marres, Henri A. M.
Takes, Robert P.
van den Broek, Guido B.
author_sort Schimberg, Anouk S.
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to assess feasibility and safety of office-based transnasal balloon dilation of neopharyngeal and proximal esophageal strictures in patients with a history of head and neck carcinoma. The secondary objective was to explore its effectiveness. This prospective case series included patients previously treated for head and neck carcinoma with neopharyngeal or proximal esophageal strictures who underwent transnasal balloon dilation under topical anesthesia. The target dilation diameter was 15 mm; if necessary dilation procedures were repeated every 2–4 weeks until this target was reached. Completion rates, adverse events, and patient experiences measured by VAS scores (0 = no complaints – 10 = unbearable complaints), dysphagia scores based on food consistency (0 = no dysphagia – 5 = unable to swallow liquids/saliva), and self-reported changes in swallowing symptoms were recorded. Follow-up was 2 months. Twenty-six procedures were performed in 12 patients, with a completion rate of 92%. One minor complication occurred, i.e. an infection of the dilation site. Tolerance of the procedure was good (median VAS = 2). The dysphagia score improved after a mean of 2.2 procedures per patient, however not significantly. Eight patients reported improvement in dysphagia, of whom 3 had recurrence of dysphagia within 1 month post-treatment. Office-based transnasal balloon dilation is a feasible and safe in-office procedure which is well-tolerated by patients. The dilations can improve dysphagia, although effects might be transient.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8844154
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88441542022-02-23 Feasibility and Safety of Office-Based Transnasal Balloon Dilation for Neopharyngeal and Proximal Esophageal Strictures in Patients with a History of Head and Neck Carcinoma Schimberg, Anouk S. Wellenstein, David J. Schutte, Henrieke W. Honings, J. Marres, Henri A. M. Takes, Robert P. van den Broek, Guido B. Dysphagia Original Article The aim of this study was to assess feasibility and safety of office-based transnasal balloon dilation of neopharyngeal and proximal esophageal strictures in patients with a history of head and neck carcinoma. The secondary objective was to explore its effectiveness. This prospective case series included patients previously treated for head and neck carcinoma with neopharyngeal or proximal esophageal strictures who underwent transnasal balloon dilation under topical anesthesia. The target dilation diameter was 15 mm; if necessary dilation procedures were repeated every 2–4 weeks until this target was reached. Completion rates, adverse events, and patient experiences measured by VAS scores (0 = no complaints – 10 = unbearable complaints), dysphagia scores based on food consistency (0 = no dysphagia – 5 = unable to swallow liquids/saliva), and self-reported changes in swallowing symptoms were recorded. Follow-up was 2 months. Twenty-six procedures were performed in 12 patients, with a completion rate of 92%. One minor complication occurred, i.e. an infection of the dilation site. Tolerance of the procedure was good (median VAS = 2). The dysphagia score improved after a mean of 2.2 procedures per patient, however not significantly. Eight patients reported improvement in dysphagia, of whom 3 had recurrence of dysphagia within 1 month post-treatment. Office-based transnasal balloon dilation is a feasible and safe in-office procedure which is well-tolerated by patients. The dilations can improve dysphagia, although effects might be transient. Springer US 2021-03-10 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8844154/ /pubmed/33689024 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00455-021-10253-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Schimberg, Anouk S.
Wellenstein, David J.
Schutte, Henrieke W.
Honings, J.
Marres, Henri A. M.
Takes, Robert P.
van den Broek, Guido B.
Feasibility and Safety of Office-Based Transnasal Balloon Dilation for Neopharyngeal and Proximal Esophageal Strictures in Patients with a History of Head and Neck Carcinoma
title Feasibility and Safety of Office-Based Transnasal Balloon Dilation for Neopharyngeal and Proximal Esophageal Strictures in Patients with a History of Head and Neck Carcinoma
title_full Feasibility and Safety of Office-Based Transnasal Balloon Dilation for Neopharyngeal and Proximal Esophageal Strictures in Patients with a History of Head and Neck Carcinoma
title_fullStr Feasibility and Safety of Office-Based Transnasal Balloon Dilation for Neopharyngeal and Proximal Esophageal Strictures in Patients with a History of Head and Neck Carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility and Safety of Office-Based Transnasal Balloon Dilation for Neopharyngeal and Proximal Esophageal Strictures in Patients with a History of Head and Neck Carcinoma
title_short Feasibility and Safety of Office-Based Transnasal Balloon Dilation for Neopharyngeal and Proximal Esophageal Strictures in Patients with a History of Head and Neck Carcinoma
title_sort feasibility and safety of office-based transnasal balloon dilation for neopharyngeal and proximal esophageal strictures in patients with a history of head and neck carcinoma
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8844154/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33689024
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00455-021-10253-z
work_keys_str_mv AT schimberganouks feasibilityandsafetyofofficebasedtransnasalballoondilationforneopharyngealandproximalesophagealstricturesinpatientswithahistoryofheadandneckcarcinoma
AT wellensteindavidj feasibilityandsafetyofofficebasedtransnasalballoondilationforneopharyngealandproximalesophagealstricturesinpatientswithahistoryofheadandneckcarcinoma
AT schuttehenriekew feasibilityandsafetyofofficebasedtransnasalballoondilationforneopharyngealandproximalesophagealstricturesinpatientswithahistoryofheadandneckcarcinoma
AT honingsj feasibilityandsafetyofofficebasedtransnasalballoondilationforneopharyngealandproximalesophagealstricturesinpatientswithahistoryofheadandneckcarcinoma
AT marreshenriam feasibilityandsafetyofofficebasedtransnasalballoondilationforneopharyngealandproximalesophagealstricturesinpatientswithahistoryofheadandneckcarcinoma
AT takesrobertp feasibilityandsafetyofofficebasedtransnasalballoondilationforneopharyngealandproximalesophagealstricturesinpatientswithahistoryofheadandneckcarcinoma
AT vandenbroekguidob feasibilityandsafetyofofficebasedtransnasalballoondilationforneopharyngealandproximalesophagealstricturesinpatientswithahistoryofheadandneckcarcinoma