Cargando…
A tale of two gradients: differences between the left and right hemispheres predict semantic cognition
Decomposition of whole-brain functional connectivity patterns reveals a principal gradient that captures the separation of sensorimotor cortex from heteromodal regions in the default mode network (DMN). Functional homotopy is strongest in sensorimotor areas, and weakest in heteromodal cortices, sugg...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8844158/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34510282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00429-021-02374-w |
_version_ | 1784651419096186880 |
---|---|
author | Gonzalez Alam, Tirso Rene del Jesus Mckeown, Brontë L. A. Gao, Zhiyao Bernhardt, Boris Vos de Wael, Reinder Margulies, Daniel S. Smallwood, Jonathan Jefferies, Elizabeth |
author_facet | Gonzalez Alam, Tirso Rene del Jesus Mckeown, Brontë L. A. Gao, Zhiyao Bernhardt, Boris Vos de Wael, Reinder Margulies, Daniel S. Smallwood, Jonathan Jefferies, Elizabeth |
author_sort | Gonzalez Alam, Tirso Rene del Jesus |
collection | PubMed |
description | Decomposition of whole-brain functional connectivity patterns reveals a principal gradient that captures the separation of sensorimotor cortex from heteromodal regions in the default mode network (DMN). Functional homotopy is strongest in sensorimotor areas, and weakest in heteromodal cortices, suggesting there may be differences between the left and right hemispheres (LH/RH) in the principal gradient, especially towards its apex. This study characterised hemispheric differences in the position of large-scale cortical networks along the principal gradient, and their functional significance. We collected resting-state fMRI and semantic, working memory and non-verbal reasoning performance in 175 + healthy volunteers. We then extracted the principal gradient of connectivity for each participant, tested which networks showed significant hemispheric differences on the gradient, and regressed participants’ behavioural efficiency in tasks outside the scanner against interhemispheric gradient differences for each network. LH showed a higher overall principal gradient value, consistent with its role in heteromodal semantic cognition. One frontotemporal control subnetwork was linked to individual differences in semantic cognition: when it was nearer heteromodal DMN on the principal gradient in LH, participants showed more efficient semantic retrieval—and this network also showed a strong hemispheric difference in response to semantic demands but not working memory load in a separate study. In contrast, when a dorsal attention subnetwork was closer to the heteromodal end of the principal gradient in RH, participants showed better visual reasoning. Lateralization of function may reflect differences in connectivity between control and heteromodal regions in LH, and attention and visual regions in RH. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00429-021-02374-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8844158 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88441582022-02-23 A tale of two gradients: differences between the left and right hemispheres predict semantic cognition Gonzalez Alam, Tirso Rene del Jesus Mckeown, Brontë L. A. Gao, Zhiyao Bernhardt, Boris Vos de Wael, Reinder Margulies, Daniel S. Smallwood, Jonathan Jefferies, Elizabeth Brain Struct Funct Original Article Decomposition of whole-brain functional connectivity patterns reveals a principal gradient that captures the separation of sensorimotor cortex from heteromodal regions in the default mode network (DMN). Functional homotopy is strongest in sensorimotor areas, and weakest in heteromodal cortices, suggesting there may be differences between the left and right hemispheres (LH/RH) in the principal gradient, especially towards its apex. This study characterised hemispheric differences in the position of large-scale cortical networks along the principal gradient, and their functional significance. We collected resting-state fMRI and semantic, working memory and non-verbal reasoning performance in 175 + healthy volunteers. We then extracted the principal gradient of connectivity for each participant, tested which networks showed significant hemispheric differences on the gradient, and regressed participants’ behavioural efficiency in tasks outside the scanner against interhemispheric gradient differences for each network. LH showed a higher overall principal gradient value, consistent with its role in heteromodal semantic cognition. One frontotemporal control subnetwork was linked to individual differences in semantic cognition: when it was nearer heteromodal DMN on the principal gradient in LH, participants showed more efficient semantic retrieval—and this network also showed a strong hemispheric difference in response to semantic demands but not working memory load in a separate study. In contrast, when a dorsal attention subnetwork was closer to the heteromodal end of the principal gradient in RH, participants showed better visual reasoning. Lateralization of function may reflect differences in connectivity between control and heteromodal regions in LH, and attention and visual regions in RH. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00429-021-02374-w. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-09-12 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8844158/ /pubmed/34510282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00429-021-02374-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Gonzalez Alam, Tirso Rene del Jesus Mckeown, Brontë L. A. Gao, Zhiyao Bernhardt, Boris Vos de Wael, Reinder Margulies, Daniel S. Smallwood, Jonathan Jefferies, Elizabeth A tale of two gradients: differences between the left and right hemispheres predict semantic cognition |
title | A tale of two gradients: differences between the left and right hemispheres predict semantic cognition |
title_full | A tale of two gradients: differences between the left and right hemispheres predict semantic cognition |
title_fullStr | A tale of two gradients: differences between the left and right hemispheres predict semantic cognition |
title_full_unstemmed | A tale of two gradients: differences between the left and right hemispheres predict semantic cognition |
title_short | A tale of two gradients: differences between the left and right hemispheres predict semantic cognition |
title_sort | tale of two gradients: differences between the left and right hemispheres predict semantic cognition |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8844158/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34510282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00429-021-02374-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gonzalezalamtirsorenedeljesus ataleoftwogradientsdifferencesbetweentheleftandrighthemispherespredictsemanticcognition AT mckeownbrontela ataleoftwogradientsdifferencesbetweentheleftandrighthemispherespredictsemanticcognition AT gaozhiyao ataleoftwogradientsdifferencesbetweentheleftandrighthemispherespredictsemanticcognition AT bernhardtboris ataleoftwogradientsdifferencesbetweentheleftandrighthemispherespredictsemanticcognition AT vosdewaelreinder ataleoftwogradientsdifferencesbetweentheleftandrighthemispherespredictsemanticcognition AT marguliesdaniels ataleoftwogradientsdifferencesbetweentheleftandrighthemispherespredictsemanticcognition AT smallwoodjonathan ataleoftwogradientsdifferencesbetweentheleftandrighthemispherespredictsemanticcognition AT jefferieselizabeth ataleoftwogradientsdifferencesbetweentheleftandrighthemispherespredictsemanticcognition AT gonzalezalamtirsorenedeljesus taleoftwogradientsdifferencesbetweentheleftandrighthemispherespredictsemanticcognition AT mckeownbrontela taleoftwogradientsdifferencesbetweentheleftandrighthemispherespredictsemanticcognition AT gaozhiyao taleoftwogradientsdifferencesbetweentheleftandrighthemispherespredictsemanticcognition AT bernhardtboris taleoftwogradientsdifferencesbetweentheleftandrighthemispherespredictsemanticcognition AT vosdewaelreinder taleoftwogradientsdifferencesbetweentheleftandrighthemispherespredictsemanticcognition AT marguliesdaniels taleoftwogradientsdifferencesbetweentheleftandrighthemispherespredictsemanticcognition AT smallwoodjonathan taleoftwogradientsdifferencesbetweentheleftandrighthemispherespredictsemanticcognition AT jefferieselizabeth taleoftwogradientsdifferencesbetweentheleftandrighthemispherespredictsemanticcognition |