Cargando…

A tale of two gradients: differences between the left and right hemispheres predict semantic cognition

Decomposition of whole-brain functional connectivity patterns reveals a principal gradient that captures the separation of sensorimotor cortex from heteromodal regions in the default mode network (DMN). Functional homotopy is strongest in sensorimotor areas, and weakest in heteromodal cortices, sugg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gonzalez Alam, Tirso Rene del Jesus, Mckeown, Brontë L. A., Gao, Zhiyao, Bernhardt, Boris, Vos de Wael, Reinder, Margulies, Daniel S., Smallwood, Jonathan, Jefferies, Elizabeth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8844158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34510282
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00429-021-02374-w
_version_ 1784651419096186880
author Gonzalez Alam, Tirso Rene del Jesus
Mckeown, Brontë L. A.
Gao, Zhiyao
Bernhardt, Boris
Vos de Wael, Reinder
Margulies, Daniel S.
Smallwood, Jonathan
Jefferies, Elizabeth
author_facet Gonzalez Alam, Tirso Rene del Jesus
Mckeown, Brontë L. A.
Gao, Zhiyao
Bernhardt, Boris
Vos de Wael, Reinder
Margulies, Daniel S.
Smallwood, Jonathan
Jefferies, Elizabeth
author_sort Gonzalez Alam, Tirso Rene del Jesus
collection PubMed
description Decomposition of whole-brain functional connectivity patterns reveals a principal gradient that captures the separation of sensorimotor cortex from heteromodal regions in the default mode network (DMN). Functional homotopy is strongest in sensorimotor areas, and weakest in heteromodal cortices, suggesting there may be differences between the left and right hemispheres (LH/RH) in the principal gradient, especially towards its apex. This study characterised hemispheric differences in the position of large-scale cortical networks along the principal gradient, and their functional significance. We collected resting-state fMRI and semantic, working memory and non-verbal reasoning performance in 175 + healthy volunteers. We then extracted the principal gradient of connectivity for each participant, tested which networks showed significant hemispheric differences on the gradient, and regressed participants’ behavioural efficiency in tasks outside the scanner against interhemispheric gradient differences for each network. LH showed a higher overall principal gradient value, consistent with its role in heteromodal semantic cognition. One frontotemporal control subnetwork was linked to individual differences in semantic cognition: when it was nearer heteromodal DMN on the principal gradient in LH, participants showed more efficient semantic retrieval—and this network also showed a strong hemispheric difference in response to semantic demands but not working memory load in a separate study. In contrast, when a dorsal attention subnetwork was closer to the heteromodal end of the principal gradient in RH, participants showed better visual reasoning. Lateralization of function may reflect differences in connectivity between control and heteromodal regions in LH, and attention and visual regions in RH. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00429-021-02374-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8844158
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88441582022-02-23 A tale of two gradients: differences between the left and right hemispheres predict semantic cognition Gonzalez Alam, Tirso Rene del Jesus Mckeown, Brontë L. A. Gao, Zhiyao Bernhardt, Boris Vos de Wael, Reinder Margulies, Daniel S. Smallwood, Jonathan Jefferies, Elizabeth Brain Struct Funct Original Article Decomposition of whole-brain functional connectivity patterns reveals a principal gradient that captures the separation of sensorimotor cortex from heteromodal regions in the default mode network (DMN). Functional homotopy is strongest in sensorimotor areas, and weakest in heteromodal cortices, suggesting there may be differences between the left and right hemispheres (LH/RH) in the principal gradient, especially towards its apex. This study characterised hemispheric differences in the position of large-scale cortical networks along the principal gradient, and their functional significance. We collected resting-state fMRI and semantic, working memory and non-verbal reasoning performance in 175 + healthy volunteers. We then extracted the principal gradient of connectivity for each participant, tested which networks showed significant hemispheric differences on the gradient, and regressed participants’ behavioural efficiency in tasks outside the scanner against interhemispheric gradient differences for each network. LH showed a higher overall principal gradient value, consistent with its role in heteromodal semantic cognition. One frontotemporal control subnetwork was linked to individual differences in semantic cognition: when it was nearer heteromodal DMN on the principal gradient in LH, participants showed more efficient semantic retrieval—and this network also showed a strong hemispheric difference in response to semantic demands but not working memory load in a separate study. In contrast, when a dorsal attention subnetwork was closer to the heteromodal end of the principal gradient in RH, participants showed better visual reasoning. Lateralization of function may reflect differences in connectivity between control and heteromodal regions in LH, and attention and visual regions in RH. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00429-021-02374-w. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-09-12 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8844158/ /pubmed/34510282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00429-021-02374-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Gonzalez Alam, Tirso Rene del Jesus
Mckeown, Brontë L. A.
Gao, Zhiyao
Bernhardt, Boris
Vos de Wael, Reinder
Margulies, Daniel S.
Smallwood, Jonathan
Jefferies, Elizabeth
A tale of two gradients: differences between the left and right hemispheres predict semantic cognition
title A tale of two gradients: differences between the left and right hemispheres predict semantic cognition
title_full A tale of two gradients: differences between the left and right hemispheres predict semantic cognition
title_fullStr A tale of two gradients: differences between the left and right hemispheres predict semantic cognition
title_full_unstemmed A tale of two gradients: differences between the left and right hemispheres predict semantic cognition
title_short A tale of two gradients: differences between the left and right hemispheres predict semantic cognition
title_sort tale of two gradients: differences between the left and right hemispheres predict semantic cognition
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8844158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34510282
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00429-021-02374-w
work_keys_str_mv AT gonzalezalamtirsorenedeljesus ataleoftwogradientsdifferencesbetweentheleftandrighthemispherespredictsemanticcognition
AT mckeownbrontela ataleoftwogradientsdifferencesbetweentheleftandrighthemispherespredictsemanticcognition
AT gaozhiyao ataleoftwogradientsdifferencesbetweentheleftandrighthemispherespredictsemanticcognition
AT bernhardtboris ataleoftwogradientsdifferencesbetweentheleftandrighthemispherespredictsemanticcognition
AT vosdewaelreinder ataleoftwogradientsdifferencesbetweentheleftandrighthemispherespredictsemanticcognition
AT marguliesdaniels ataleoftwogradientsdifferencesbetweentheleftandrighthemispherespredictsemanticcognition
AT smallwoodjonathan ataleoftwogradientsdifferencesbetweentheleftandrighthemispherespredictsemanticcognition
AT jefferieselizabeth ataleoftwogradientsdifferencesbetweentheleftandrighthemispherespredictsemanticcognition
AT gonzalezalamtirsorenedeljesus taleoftwogradientsdifferencesbetweentheleftandrighthemispherespredictsemanticcognition
AT mckeownbrontela taleoftwogradientsdifferencesbetweentheleftandrighthemispherespredictsemanticcognition
AT gaozhiyao taleoftwogradientsdifferencesbetweentheleftandrighthemispherespredictsemanticcognition
AT bernhardtboris taleoftwogradientsdifferencesbetweentheleftandrighthemispherespredictsemanticcognition
AT vosdewaelreinder taleoftwogradientsdifferencesbetweentheleftandrighthemispherespredictsemanticcognition
AT marguliesdaniels taleoftwogradientsdifferencesbetweentheleftandrighthemispherespredictsemanticcognition
AT smallwoodjonathan taleoftwogradientsdifferencesbetweentheleftandrighthemispherespredictsemanticcognition
AT jefferieselizabeth taleoftwogradientsdifferencesbetweentheleftandrighthemispherespredictsemanticcognition