Cargando…
Assessment of the Response to Abdominal and Pelvic Computed Tomography Report Recommendations: A Single-Center, Retrospective, Chart Review Study
Objectives The radiology report is the primary form of communication between the radiologists and referring clinicians. It is a structured document containing several key components pertaining to the interpretation of radiological examinations and may require the addition of follow-up imaging recomm...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8844232/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35186516 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.21190 |
_version_ | 1784651432592408576 |
---|---|
author | Alsharif, Shaza Alasaad, Ghalib Bukhari, Mohammed K Sharkar, Abdulaziz Altaf, Mohammed Milibari, Shaymaa Alsolaimani, Roaa Alshamrani, Khalid M |
author_facet | Alsharif, Shaza Alasaad, Ghalib Bukhari, Mohammed K Sharkar, Abdulaziz Altaf, Mohammed Milibari, Shaymaa Alsolaimani, Roaa Alshamrani, Khalid M |
author_sort | Alsharif, Shaza |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objectives The radiology report is the primary form of communication between the radiologists and referring clinicians. It is a structured document containing several key components pertaining to the interpretation of radiological examinations and may require the addition of follow-up imaging recommendations to optimize patient outcomes. This study aims to determine whether follow-up imaging recommendations are being acknowledged and acted upon by referrers. Methods This retrospective study was conducted at a single tertiary hospital. Prerecorded BESTCare data of patients who underwent abdominal and pelvic computed tomography (CT) scans between October 1, 2017, and December 31, 2017, and received recommendations for further evaluation were collected after obtaining ethical approval from the local authority. Data of patients younger than 14 years old, patients who did not receive a recommendation, and patients who had CT scans that were uploaded to the BESTCare system but were performed outside the institution were excluded. The collected data were recorded in a password-protected Microsoft Excel file for further analysis. Results A total of 523 report recommendations from 422 abdominal and pelvic CT reports were analyzed. The most common organs indicated for CT scan evaluation were the breast (N = 54, 10.33%), kidney (N = 46, 8.80%), lymph node (N = 36, 6.88%), and colon (N = 33, 6.31%). The most common type of further evaluation recommended was further imaging (N = 410, 78.39%). A total of 278 (53.15%) recommendations were not performed, with 199 (71.58%) not having a documented rationale for noncompliance. Conclusion The majority of the follow-up imaging recommendations to ordering physicians were not carried out. This study highlights the need for notification and audit systems to monitor compliance with follow-up recommendations. Improving the communication between radiologists and referring physicians is key to optimizing patient healthcare. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8844232 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88442322022-02-17 Assessment of the Response to Abdominal and Pelvic Computed Tomography Report Recommendations: A Single-Center, Retrospective, Chart Review Study Alsharif, Shaza Alasaad, Ghalib Bukhari, Mohammed K Sharkar, Abdulaziz Altaf, Mohammed Milibari, Shaymaa Alsolaimani, Roaa Alshamrani, Khalid M Cureus Radiology Objectives The radiology report is the primary form of communication between the radiologists and referring clinicians. It is a structured document containing several key components pertaining to the interpretation of radiological examinations and may require the addition of follow-up imaging recommendations to optimize patient outcomes. This study aims to determine whether follow-up imaging recommendations are being acknowledged and acted upon by referrers. Methods This retrospective study was conducted at a single tertiary hospital. Prerecorded BESTCare data of patients who underwent abdominal and pelvic computed tomography (CT) scans between October 1, 2017, and December 31, 2017, and received recommendations for further evaluation were collected after obtaining ethical approval from the local authority. Data of patients younger than 14 years old, patients who did not receive a recommendation, and patients who had CT scans that were uploaded to the BESTCare system but were performed outside the institution were excluded. The collected data were recorded in a password-protected Microsoft Excel file for further analysis. Results A total of 523 report recommendations from 422 abdominal and pelvic CT reports were analyzed. The most common organs indicated for CT scan evaluation were the breast (N = 54, 10.33%), kidney (N = 46, 8.80%), lymph node (N = 36, 6.88%), and colon (N = 33, 6.31%). The most common type of further evaluation recommended was further imaging (N = 410, 78.39%). A total of 278 (53.15%) recommendations were not performed, with 199 (71.58%) not having a documented rationale for noncompliance. Conclusion The majority of the follow-up imaging recommendations to ordering physicians were not carried out. This study highlights the need for notification and audit systems to monitor compliance with follow-up recommendations. Improving the communication between radiologists and referring physicians is key to optimizing patient healthcare. Cureus 2022-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8844232/ /pubmed/35186516 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.21190 Text en Copyright © 2022, Alsharif et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Radiology Alsharif, Shaza Alasaad, Ghalib Bukhari, Mohammed K Sharkar, Abdulaziz Altaf, Mohammed Milibari, Shaymaa Alsolaimani, Roaa Alshamrani, Khalid M Assessment of the Response to Abdominal and Pelvic Computed Tomography Report Recommendations: A Single-Center, Retrospective, Chart Review Study |
title | Assessment of the Response to Abdominal and Pelvic Computed Tomography Report Recommendations: A Single-Center, Retrospective, Chart Review Study |
title_full | Assessment of the Response to Abdominal and Pelvic Computed Tomography Report Recommendations: A Single-Center, Retrospective, Chart Review Study |
title_fullStr | Assessment of the Response to Abdominal and Pelvic Computed Tomography Report Recommendations: A Single-Center, Retrospective, Chart Review Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of the Response to Abdominal and Pelvic Computed Tomography Report Recommendations: A Single-Center, Retrospective, Chart Review Study |
title_short | Assessment of the Response to Abdominal and Pelvic Computed Tomography Report Recommendations: A Single-Center, Retrospective, Chart Review Study |
title_sort | assessment of the response to abdominal and pelvic computed tomography report recommendations: a single-center, retrospective, chart review study |
topic | Radiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8844232/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35186516 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.21190 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alsharifshaza assessmentoftheresponsetoabdominalandpelviccomputedtomographyreportrecommendationsasinglecenterretrospectivechartreviewstudy AT alasaadghalib assessmentoftheresponsetoabdominalandpelviccomputedtomographyreportrecommendationsasinglecenterretrospectivechartreviewstudy AT bukharimohammedk assessmentoftheresponsetoabdominalandpelviccomputedtomographyreportrecommendationsasinglecenterretrospectivechartreviewstudy AT sharkarabdulaziz assessmentoftheresponsetoabdominalandpelviccomputedtomographyreportrecommendationsasinglecenterretrospectivechartreviewstudy AT altafmohammed assessmentoftheresponsetoabdominalandpelviccomputedtomographyreportrecommendationsasinglecenterretrospectivechartreviewstudy AT milibarishaymaa assessmentoftheresponsetoabdominalandpelviccomputedtomographyreportrecommendationsasinglecenterretrospectivechartreviewstudy AT alsolaimaniroaa assessmentoftheresponsetoabdominalandpelviccomputedtomographyreportrecommendationsasinglecenterretrospectivechartreviewstudy AT alshamranikhalidm assessmentoftheresponsetoabdominalandpelviccomputedtomographyreportrecommendationsasinglecenterretrospectivechartreviewstudy |