Cargando…

Assessment of the Response to Abdominal and Pelvic Computed Tomography Report Recommendations: A Single-Center, Retrospective, Chart Review Study

Objectives The radiology report is the primary form of communication between the radiologists and referring clinicians. It is a structured document containing several key components pertaining to the interpretation of radiological examinations and may require the addition of follow-up imaging recomm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alsharif, Shaza, Alasaad, Ghalib, Bukhari, Mohammed K, Sharkar, Abdulaziz, Altaf, Mohammed, Milibari, Shaymaa, Alsolaimani, Roaa, Alshamrani, Khalid M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8844232/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35186516
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.21190
_version_ 1784651432592408576
author Alsharif, Shaza
Alasaad, Ghalib
Bukhari, Mohammed K
Sharkar, Abdulaziz
Altaf, Mohammed
Milibari, Shaymaa
Alsolaimani, Roaa
Alshamrani, Khalid M
author_facet Alsharif, Shaza
Alasaad, Ghalib
Bukhari, Mohammed K
Sharkar, Abdulaziz
Altaf, Mohammed
Milibari, Shaymaa
Alsolaimani, Roaa
Alshamrani, Khalid M
author_sort Alsharif, Shaza
collection PubMed
description Objectives The radiology report is the primary form of communication between the radiologists and referring clinicians. It is a structured document containing several key components pertaining to the interpretation of radiological examinations and may require the addition of follow-up imaging recommendations to optimize patient outcomes. This study aims to determine whether follow-up imaging recommendations are being acknowledged and acted upon by referrers. Methods This retrospective study was conducted at a single tertiary hospital. Prerecorded BESTCare data of patients who underwent abdominal and pelvic computed tomography (CT) scans between October 1, 2017, and December 31, 2017, and received recommendations for further evaluation were collected after obtaining ethical approval from the local authority. Data of patients younger than 14 years old, patients who did not receive a recommendation, and patients who had CT scans that were uploaded to the BESTCare system but were performed outside the institution were excluded. The collected data were recorded in a password-protected Microsoft Excel file for further analysis. Results A total of 523 report recommendations from 422 abdominal and pelvic CT reports were analyzed. The most common organs indicated for CT scan evaluation were the breast (N = 54, 10.33%), kidney (N = 46, 8.80%), lymph node (N = 36, 6.88%), and colon (N = 33, 6.31%). The most common type of further evaluation recommended was further imaging (N = 410, 78.39%). A total of 278 (53.15%) recommendations were not performed, with 199 (71.58%) not having a documented rationale for noncompliance. Conclusion The majority of the follow-up imaging recommendations to ordering physicians were not carried out. This study highlights the need for notification and audit systems to monitor compliance with follow-up recommendations. Improving the communication between radiologists and referring physicians is key to optimizing patient healthcare.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8844232
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88442322022-02-17 Assessment of the Response to Abdominal and Pelvic Computed Tomography Report Recommendations: A Single-Center, Retrospective, Chart Review Study Alsharif, Shaza Alasaad, Ghalib Bukhari, Mohammed K Sharkar, Abdulaziz Altaf, Mohammed Milibari, Shaymaa Alsolaimani, Roaa Alshamrani, Khalid M Cureus Radiology Objectives The radiology report is the primary form of communication between the radiologists and referring clinicians. It is a structured document containing several key components pertaining to the interpretation of radiological examinations and may require the addition of follow-up imaging recommendations to optimize patient outcomes. This study aims to determine whether follow-up imaging recommendations are being acknowledged and acted upon by referrers. Methods This retrospective study was conducted at a single tertiary hospital. Prerecorded BESTCare data of patients who underwent abdominal and pelvic computed tomography (CT) scans between October 1, 2017, and December 31, 2017, and received recommendations for further evaluation were collected after obtaining ethical approval from the local authority. Data of patients younger than 14 years old, patients who did not receive a recommendation, and patients who had CT scans that were uploaded to the BESTCare system but were performed outside the institution were excluded. The collected data were recorded in a password-protected Microsoft Excel file for further analysis. Results A total of 523 report recommendations from 422 abdominal and pelvic CT reports were analyzed. The most common organs indicated for CT scan evaluation were the breast (N = 54, 10.33%), kidney (N = 46, 8.80%), lymph node (N = 36, 6.88%), and colon (N = 33, 6.31%). The most common type of further evaluation recommended was further imaging (N = 410, 78.39%). A total of 278 (53.15%) recommendations were not performed, with 199 (71.58%) not having a documented rationale for noncompliance. Conclusion The majority of the follow-up imaging recommendations to ordering physicians were not carried out. This study highlights the need for notification and audit systems to monitor compliance with follow-up recommendations. Improving the communication between radiologists and referring physicians is key to optimizing patient healthcare. Cureus 2022-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8844232/ /pubmed/35186516 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.21190 Text en Copyright © 2022, Alsharif et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Radiology
Alsharif, Shaza
Alasaad, Ghalib
Bukhari, Mohammed K
Sharkar, Abdulaziz
Altaf, Mohammed
Milibari, Shaymaa
Alsolaimani, Roaa
Alshamrani, Khalid M
Assessment of the Response to Abdominal and Pelvic Computed Tomography Report Recommendations: A Single-Center, Retrospective, Chart Review Study
title Assessment of the Response to Abdominal and Pelvic Computed Tomography Report Recommendations: A Single-Center, Retrospective, Chart Review Study
title_full Assessment of the Response to Abdominal and Pelvic Computed Tomography Report Recommendations: A Single-Center, Retrospective, Chart Review Study
title_fullStr Assessment of the Response to Abdominal and Pelvic Computed Tomography Report Recommendations: A Single-Center, Retrospective, Chart Review Study
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of the Response to Abdominal and Pelvic Computed Tomography Report Recommendations: A Single-Center, Retrospective, Chart Review Study
title_short Assessment of the Response to Abdominal and Pelvic Computed Tomography Report Recommendations: A Single-Center, Retrospective, Chart Review Study
title_sort assessment of the response to abdominal and pelvic computed tomography report recommendations: a single-center, retrospective, chart review study
topic Radiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8844232/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35186516
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.21190
work_keys_str_mv AT alsharifshaza assessmentoftheresponsetoabdominalandpelviccomputedtomographyreportrecommendationsasinglecenterretrospectivechartreviewstudy
AT alasaadghalib assessmentoftheresponsetoabdominalandpelviccomputedtomographyreportrecommendationsasinglecenterretrospectivechartreviewstudy
AT bukharimohammedk assessmentoftheresponsetoabdominalandpelviccomputedtomographyreportrecommendationsasinglecenterretrospectivechartreviewstudy
AT sharkarabdulaziz assessmentoftheresponsetoabdominalandpelviccomputedtomographyreportrecommendationsasinglecenterretrospectivechartreviewstudy
AT altafmohammed assessmentoftheresponsetoabdominalandpelviccomputedtomographyreportrecommendationsasinglecenterretrospectivechartreviewstudy
AT milibarishaymaa assessmentoftheresponsetoabdominalandpelviccomputedtomographyreportrecommendationsasinglecenterretrospectivechartreviewstudy
AT alsolaimaniroaa assessmentoftheresponsetoabdominalandpelviccomputedtomographyreportrecommendationsasinglecenterretrospectivechartreviewstudy
AT alshamranikhalidm assessmentoftheresponsetoabdominalandpelviccomputedtomographyreportrecommendationsasinglecenterretrospectivechartreviewstudy