Cargando…

Effect of Genetic Variants of Gonadotropins and Their Receptors on Ovarian Stimulation Outcomes: A Delphi Consensus

BACKGROUND: A Delphi consensus was conducted to evaluate the influence of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes encoding gonadotropin and gonadotropin receptors on clinical ovarian stimulation outcomes following assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment. METHODS: Nine experts plus t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Conforti, Alessandro, Tüttelmann, Frank, Alviggi, Carlo, Behre, Hermann M., Fischer, Robert, Hu, Liang, Polyzos, Nikolaos P., Chuderland, Dana, Rama Raju, Gottumukkala Achyuta, D’Hooghe, Thomas, Simoni, Manuela, Sunkara, Sesh K., Longobardi, Salvatore
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8844496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35178027
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.797365
_version_ 1784651489710440448
author Conforti, Alessandro
Tüttelmann, Frank
Alviggi, Carlo
Behre, Hermann M.
Fischer, Robert
Hu, Liang
Polyzos, Nikolaos P.
Chuderland, Dana
Rama Raju, Gottumukkala Achyuta
D’Hooghe, Thomas
Simoni, Manuela
Sunkara, Sesh K.
Longobardi, Salvatore
author_facet Conforti, Alessandro
Tüttelmann, Frank
Alviggi, Carlo
Behre, Hermann M.
Fischer, Robert
Hu, Liang
Polyzos, Nikolaos P.
Chuderland, Dana
Rama Raju, Gottumukkala Achyuta
D’Hooghe, Thomas
Simoni, Manuela
Sunkara, Sesh K.
Longobardi, Salvatore
author_sort Conforti, Alessandro
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A Delphi consensus was conducted to evaluate the influence of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes encoding gonadotropin and gonadotropin receptors on clinical ovarian stimulation outcomes following assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment. METHODS: Nine experts plus two Scientific Coordinators discussed and amended statements plus supporting references proposed by the Scientific Coordinators. The statements were distributed via an online survey to 36 experts, who voted on their level of agreement or disagreement with each statement. Consensus was reached if the proportion of participants agreeing or disagreeing with a statement was >66%. RESULTS: Eleven statements were developed, of which two statements were merged. Overall, eight statements achieved consensus and two statements did not achieve consensus. The statements reaching consensus are summarized here. (1) SNP in the follicle stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR), rs6166 (c.2039A>G, p.Asn680Ser) (N=5 statements): Ser/Ser carriers have higher basal FSH levels than Asn/Asn carriers. Ser/Ser carriers require higher amounts of gonadotropin during ovarian stimulation than Asn/Asn carriers. Ser/Ser carriers produce fewer oocytes during ovarian stimulation than Asn/Asn or Asn/Ser carriers. There is mixed evidence supporting an association between this variant and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. (2) SNP of FSHR, rs6165 (c.919G>A, p.Thr307Ala) (N=1 statement): Few studies suggest Thr/Thr carriers require a shorter duration of gonadotropin stimulation than Thr/Ala or Ala/Ala carriers. (3) SNP of FSHR, rs1394205 (−29G>A) (N=1 statement): Limited data in specific ethnic groups suggest that A/A allele carriers may require higher amounts of gonadotropin during ovarian stimulation and produce fewer oocytes than G/G carriers. (4) SNP of FSH β-chain (FSHB), rs10835638 (−211G>T) (N=1 statement): There is contradictory evidence supporting an association between this variant and basal FSH levels or oocyte number. (5) SNPs of luteinizing hormone β-chain (LHB) and LH/choriogonadotropin receptor (LHCGR) genes (N=1 statement): these may influence ovarian stimulation outcomes and could represent potential future targets for pharmacogenomic research in ART, although data are still very limited. CONCLUSIONS: This Delphi consensus provides clinical perspectives from a diverse international group of experts. The consensus supports a link between some variants in gonadotropin/gonadotropin receptor genes and ovarian stimulation outcomes; however, further research is needed to clarify these findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8844496
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88444962022-02-16 Effect of Genetic Variants of Gonadotropins and Their Receptors on Ovarian Stimulation Outcomes: A Delphi Consensus Conforti, Alessandro Tüttelmann, Frank Alviggi, Carlo Behre, Hermann M. Fischer, Robert Hu, Liang Polyzos, Nikolaos P. Chuderland, Dana Rama Raju, Gottumukkala Achyuta D’Hooghe, Thomas Simoni, Manuela Sunkara, Sesh K. Longobardi, Salvatore Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology BACKGROUND: A Delphi consensus was conducted to evaluate the influence of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes encoding gonadotropin and gonadotropin receptors on clinical ovarian stimulation outcomes following assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment. METHODS: Nine experts plus two Scientific Coordinators discussed and amended statements plus supporting references proposed by the Scientific Coordinators. The statements were distributed via an online survey to 36 experts, who voted on their level of agreement or disagreement with each statement. Consensus was reached if the proportion of participants agreeing or disagreeing with a statement was >66%. RESULTS: Eleven statements were developed, of which two statements were merged. Overall, eight statements achieved consensus and two statements did not achieve consensus. The statements reaching consensus are summarized here. (1) SNP in the follicle stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR), rs6166 (c.2039A>G, p.Asn680Ser) (N=5 statements): Ser/Ser carriers have higher basal FSH levels than Asn/Asn carriers. Ser/Ser carriers require higher amounts of gonadotropin during ovarian stimulation than Asn/Asn carriers. Ser/Ser carriers produce fewer oocytes during ovarian stimulation than Asn/Asn or Asn/Ser carriers. There is mixed evidence supporting an association between this variant and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. (2) SNP of FSHR, rs6165 (c.919G>A, p.Thr307Ala) (N=1 statement): Few studies suggest Thr/Thr carriers require a shorter duration of gonadotropin stimulation than Thr/Ala or Ala/Ala carriers. (3) SNP of FSHR, rs1394205 (−29G>A) (N=1 statement): Limited data in specific ethnic groups suggest that A/A allele carriers may require higher amounts of gonadotropin during ovarian stimulation and produce fewer oocytes than G/G carriers. (4) SNP of FSH β-chain (FSHB), rs10835638 (−211G>T) (N=1 statement): There is contradictory evidence supporting an association between this variant and basal FSH levels or oocyte number. (5) SNPs of luteinizing hormone β-chain (LHB) and LH/choriogonadotropin receptor (LHCGR) genes (N=1 statement): these may influence ovarian stimulation outcomes and could represent potential future targets for pharmacogenomic research in ART, although data are still very limited. CONCLUSIONS: This Delphi consensus provides clinical perspectives from a diverse international group of experts. The consensus supports a link between some variants in gonadotropin/gonadotropin receptor genes and ovarian stimulation outcomes; however, further research is needed to clarify these findings. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8844496/ /pubmed/35178027 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.797365 Text en Copyright © 2022 Conforti, Tüttelmann, Alviggi, Behre, Fischer, Hu, Polyzos, Chuderland, Rama Raju, D’Hooghe, Simoni, Sunkara and Longobardi https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Endocrinology
Conforti, Alessandro
Tüttelmann, Frank
Alviggi, Carlo
Behre, Hermann M.
Fischer, Robert
Hu, Liang
Polyzos, Nikolaos P.
Chuderland, Dana
Rama Raju, Gottumukkala Achyuta
D’Hooghe, Thomas
Simoni, Manuela
Sunkara, Sesh K.
Longobardi, Salvatore
Effect of Genetic Variants of Gonadotropins and Their Receptors on Ovarian Stimulation Outcomes: A Delphi Consensus
title Effect of Genetic Variants of Gonadotropins and Their Receptors on Ovarian Stimulation Outcomes: A Delphi Consensus
title_full Effect of Genetic Variants of Gonadotropins and Their Receptors on Ovarian Stimulation Outcomes: A Delphi Consensus
title_fullStr Effect of Genetic Variants of Gonadotropins and Their Receptors on Ovarian Stimulation Outcomes: A Delphi Consensus
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Genetic Variants of Gonadotropins and Their Receptors on Ovarian Stimulation Outcomes: A Delphi Consensus
title_short Effect of Genetic Variants of Gonadotropins and Their Receptors on Ovarian Stimulation Outcomes: A Delphi Consensus
title_sort effect of genetic variants of gonadotropins and their receptors on ovarian stimulation outcomes: a delphi consensus
topic Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8844496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35178027
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.797365
work_keys_str_mv AT confortialessandro effectofgeneticvariantsofgonadotropinsandtheirreceptorsonovarianstimulationoutcomesadelphiconsensus
AT tuttelmannfrank effectofgeneticvariantsofgonadotropinsandtheirreceptorsonovarianstimulationoutcomesadelphiconsensus
AT alviggicarlo effectofgeneticvariantsofgonadotropinsandtheirreceptorsonovarianstimulationoutcomesadelphiconsensus
AT behrehermannm effectofgeneticvariantsofgonadotropinsandtheirreceptorsonovarianstimulationoutcomesadelphiconsensus
AT fischerrobert effectofgeneticvariantsofgonadotropinsandtheirreceptorsonovarianstimulationoutcomesadelphiconsensus
AT huliang effectofgeneticvariantsofgonadotropinsandtheirreceptorsonovarianstimulationoutcomesadelphiconsensus
AT polyzosnikolaosp effectofgeneticvariantsofgonadotropinsandtheirreceptorsonovarianstimulationoutcomesadelphiconsensus
AT chuderlanddana effectofgeneticvariantsofgonadotropinsandtheirreceptorsonovarianstimulationoutcomesadelphiconsensus
AT ramarajugottumukkalaachyuta effectofgeneticvariantsofgonadotropinsandtheirreceptorsonovarianstimulationoutcomesadelphiconsensus
AT dhooghethomas effectofgeneticvariantsofgonadotropinsandtheirreceptorsonovarianstimulationoutcomesadelphiconsensus
AT simonimanuela effectofgeneticvariantsofgonadotropinsandtheirreceptorsonovarianstimulationoutcomesadelphiconsensus
AT sunkaraseshk effectofgeneticvariantsofgonadotropinsandtheirreceptorsonovarianstimulationoutcomesadelphiconsensus
AT longobardisalvatore effectofgeneticvariantsofgonadotropinsandtheirreceptorsonovarianstimulationoutcomesadelphiconsensus