Cargando…

High Frame Rate Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound Helps Differentiate Malignant and Benign Focal Liver Lesions

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of high frame rate contrast-enhanced ultrasound (H-CEUS) of focal liver lesions (FLLs). METHODS: From July 2017 to June 2019, conventional contrast-enhanced ultrasound (C-CEUS) and H-CEUS were performed in 78 patients with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fei, Xiang, Han, Peng, Jiang, Bo, Zhu, Lianhua, Tian, Wenshuo, Sang, Maodong, Zhang, Xirui, Zhu, Yaqiong, Luo, Yukun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: XIA & HE Publishing Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8845153/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35233370
http://dx.doi.org/10.14218/JCTH.2020.00172
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of high frame rate contrast-enhanced ultrasound (H-CEUS) of focal liver lesions (FLLs). METHODS: From July 2017 to June 2019, conventional contrast-enhanced ultrasound (C-CEUS) and H-CEUS were performed in 78 patients with 78 nodules. The characteristics of C-CEUS and H-CEUS in malignant and benign groups and the differences between different lesion sizes (1–3 cm, 3–5 cm, or >5 cm) of C-CEUS and H-CEUS were examined. The diagnostic performance of C-CEUS and H-CEUS was analyzed. The chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was used to assess inter-group differences. The receiver operating characteristic curve was plotted to determine the diagnostic performance of C-CEUS and H-CEUS. RESULTS: There were significant differences in the enhancement area, fill-in direction and vascular architecture between C-CEUS and H-CEUS for both benign and malignant lesions (all p=0.000–0.008), but there were no significant differences in washout results (p=0.566 and p=0.684, respectively). For lesions 1–3 cm in size, the enhancement area, fill-in direction, and vascular architecture on C-CEUS and H-CEUS were significantly different (all p=0.000), unlike for lesions 3–5 cm or >5 cm in size. For differentiation of malignant from benign FLLs in the 1–3 cm group, H-CEUS showed sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values of 92.86%, 95.0%, 96.3%, 90.48% and 93.75%, respectively, which were higher than those for C-CEUS (75.0%, 70.0%, 77.78%, 66.67% and 72.91%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: H-CEUS provided more vascular information which could help differentiate malignant from benign FLLs, especially for lesions 1–3 cm in size.