Cargando…

Study protocol for a randomised trial evaluating the non-inferiority of stepped palliative care versus early integrated palliative care for patients with advanced lung cancer

INTRODUCTION: Integrating palliative care (PC) early in the illness course for patients with serious cancers improves their outcomes and is recommended by national organisations such as the American Society of Clinical Oncology. However, monthly visits with PC clinicians from the time of diagnosis c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Post, Kathryn E, Heuer, Lauren B, Kamal, Arif H, Kumar, Pallavi, Elyze, Madeleine, Griffith, Sarah, Han, Jacqueline, Friedman, Fred, Jackson, Ashley, Trotter, Chardria, Plotke, Rachel, Vyas, Charu, Jackson, Vicki, Rabideau, Dustin J, Greer, Joseph A, Temel, Jennifer S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8845218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35144954
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057591
_version_ 1784651625056436224
author Post, Kathryn E
Heuer, Lauren B
Kamal, Arif H
Kumar, Pallavi
Elyze, Madeleine
Griffith, Sarah
Han, Jacqueline
Friedman, Fred
Jackson, Ashley
Trotter, Chardria
Plotke, Rachel
Vyas, Charu
Jackson, Vicki
Rabideau, Dustin J
Greer, Joseph A
Temel, Jennifer S
author_facet Post, Kathryn E
Heuer, Lauren B
Kamal, Arif H
Kumar, Pallavi
Elyze, Madeleine
Griffith, Sarah
Han, Jacqueline
Friedman, Fred
Jackson, Ashley
Trotter, Chardria
Plotke, Rachel
Vyas, Charu
Jackson, Vicki
Rabideau, Dustin J
Greer, Joseph A
Temel, Jennifer S
author_sort Post, Kathryn E
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Integrating palliative care (PC) early in the illness course for patients with serious cancers improves their outcomes and is recommended by national organisations such as the American Society of Clinical Oncology. However, monthly visits with PC clinicians from the time of diagnosis can be challenging to implement due to the lack of specialty-trained PC clinicians and resources. Therefore, we developed a stepped care model to triage PC service based on patients’ needs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We are conducting a non-blinded, randomised trial to evaluate the non-inferiority of a stepped PC model compared with an early integrated PC model for improving patients’ quality of life (QOL) at 24 weeks (primary outcome). Patients assigned to early integrated PC meet with PC every 4 weeks throughout their illness. Patients assigned to stepped PC have PC visits only at clinically significant points in their illness (eg, cancer progression) unless their QOL decreases, at which time they are ‘stepped up’ and meet with PC every 4 weeks throughout the remainder of their illness. Secondary aims include assessing whether stepped PC is non-inferior to early integrated PC regarding patient-clinician communication about end of life care and length of stay on hospice as well as comparing resource utilisation. Patients are recruited from the Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Duke Cancer Center, Durham, North Carolina and University of Pennsylvania Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The target sample size is 510 patients. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study is funded by the National Cancer Institute, approved by the Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center Institutional Review Board and will be reported in accordance with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement. We will disseminate results through professional society meetings, peer-reviewed publications and presentations to patient organisations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03337399.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8845218
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88452182022-03-01 Study protocol for a randomised trial evaluating the non-inferiority of stepped palliative care versus early integrated palliative care for patients with advanced lung cancer Post, Kathryn E Heuer, Lauren B Kamal, Arif H Kumar, Pallavi Elyze, Madeleine Griffith, Sarah Han, Jacqueline Friedman, Fred Jackson, Ashley Trotter, Chardria Plotke, Rachel Vyas, Charu Jackson, Vicki Rabideau, Dustin J Greer, Joseph A Temel, Jennifer S BMJ Open Palliative Care INTRODUCTION: Integrating palliative care (PC) early in the illness course for patients with serious cancers improves their outcomes and is recommended by national organisations such as the American Society of Clinical Oncology. However, monthly visits with PC clinicians from the time of diagnosis can be challenging to implement due to the lack of specialty-trained PC clinicians and resources. Therefore, we developed a stepped care model to triage PC service based on patients’ needs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We are conducting a non-blinded, randomised trial to evaluate the non-inferiority of a stepped PC model compared with an early integrated PC model for improving patients’ quality of life (QOL) at 24 weeks (primary outcome). Patients assigned to early integrated PC meet with PC every 4 weeks throughout their illness. Patients assigned to stepped PC have PC visits only at clinically significant points in their illness (eg, cancer progression) unless their QOL decreases, at which time they are ‘stepped up’ and meet with PC every 4 weeks throughout the remainder of their illness. Secondary aims include assessing whether stepped PC is non-inferior to early integrated PC regarding patient-clinician communication about end of life care and length of stay on hospice as well as comparing resource utilisation. Patients are recruited from the Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Duke Cancer Center, Durham, North Carolina and University of Pennsylvania Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The target sample size is 510 patients. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study is funded by the National Cancer Institute, approved by the Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center Institutional Review Board and will be reported in accordance with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement. We will disseminate results through professional society meetings, peer-reviewed publications and presentations to patient organisations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03337399. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8845218/ /pubmed/35144954 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057591 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Palliative Care
Post, Kathryn E
Heuer, Lauren B
Kamal, Arif H
Kumar, Pallavi
Elyze, Madeleine
Griffith, Sarah
Han, Jacqueline
Friedman, Fred
Jackson, Ashley
Trotter, Chardria
Plotke, Rachel
Vyas, Charu
Jackson, Vicki
Rabideau, Dustin J
Greer, Joseph A
Temel, Jennifer S
Study protocol for a randomised trial evaluating the non-inferiority of stepped palliative care versus early integrated palliative care for patients with advanced lung cancer
title Study protocol for a randomised trial evaluating the non-inferiority of stepped palliative care versus early integrated palliative care for patients with advanced lung cancer
title_full Study protocol for a randomised trial evaluating the non-inferiority of stepped palliative care versus early integrated palliative care for patients with advanced lung cancer
title_fullStr Study protocol for a randomised trial evaluating the non-inferiority of stepped palliative care versus early integrated palliative care for patients with advanced lung cancer
title_full_unstemmed Study protocol for a randomised trial evaluating the non-inferiority of stepped palliative care versus early integrated palliative care for patients with advanced lung cancer
title_short Study protocol for a randomised trial evaluating the non-inferiority of stepped palliative care versus early integrated palliative care for patients with advanced lung cancer
title_sort study protocol for a randomised trial evaluating the non-inferiority of stepped palliative care versus early integrated palliative care for patients with advanced lung cancer
topic Palliative Care
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8845218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35144954
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057591
work_keys_str_mv AT postkathryne studyprotocolforarandomisedtrialevaluatingthenoninferiorityofsteppedpalliativecareversusearlyintegratedpalliativecareforpatientswithadvancedlungcancer
AT heuerlaurenb studyprotocolforarandomisedtrialevaluatingthenoninferiorityofsteppedpalliativecareversusearlyintegratedpalliativecareforpatientswithadvancedlungcancer
AT kamalarifh studyprotocolforarandomisedtrialevaluatingthenoninferiorityofsteppedpalliativecareversusearlyintegratedpalliativecareforpatientswithadvancedlungcancer
AT kumarpallavi studyprotocolforarandomisedtrialevaluatingthenoninferiorityofsteppedpalliativecareversusearlyintegratedpalliativecareforpatientswithadvancedlungcancer
AT elyzemadeleine studyprotocolforarandomisedtrialevaluatingthenoninferiorityofsteppedpalliativecareversusearlyintegratedpalliativecareforpatientswithadvancedlungcancer
AT griffithsarah studyprotocolforarandomisedtrialevaluatingthenoninferiorityofsteppedpalliativecareversusearlyintegratedpalliativecareforpatientswithadvancedlungcancer
AT hanjacqueline studyprotocolforarandomisedtrialevaluatingthenoninferiorityofsteppedpalliativecareversusearlyintegratedpalliativecareforpatientswithadvancedlungcancer
AT friedmanfred studyprotocolforarandomisedtrialevaluatingthenoninferiorityofsteppedpalliativecareversusearlyintegratedpalliativecareforpatientswithadvancedlungcancer
AT jacksonashley studyprotocolforarandomisedtrialevaluatingthenoninferiorityofsteppedpalliativecareversusearlyintegratedpalliativecareforpatientswithadvancedlungcancer
AT trotterchardria studyprotocolforarandomisedtrialevaluatingthenoninferiorityofsteppedpalliativecareversusearlyintegratedpalliativecareforpatientswithadvancedlungcancer
AT plotkerachel studyprotocolforarandomisedtrialevaluatingthenoninferiorityofsteppedpalliativecareversusearlyintegratedpalliativecareforpatientswithadvancedlungcancer
AT vyascharu studyprotocolforarandomisedtrialevaluatingthenoninferiorityofsteppedpalliativecareversusearlyintegratedpalliativecareforpatientswithadvancedlungcancer
AT jacksonvicki studyprotocolforarandomisedtrialevaluatingthenoninferiorityofsteppedpalliativecareversusearlyintegratedpalliativecareforpatientswithadvancedlungcancer
AT rabideaudustinj studyprotocolforarandomisedtrialevaluatingthenoninferiorityofsteppedpalliativecareversusearlyintegratedpalliativecareforpatientswithadvancedlungcancer
AT greerjosepha studyprotocolforarandomisedtrialevaluatingthenoninferiorityofsteppedpalliativecareversusearlyintegratedpalliativecareforpatientswithadvancedlungcancer
AT temeljennifers studyprotocolforarandomisedtrialevaluatingthenoninferiorityofsteppedpalliativecareversusearlyintegratedpalliativecareforpatientswithadvancedlungcancer