Cargando…
Meta-analysis of economic evaluation studies: data harmonisation and methodological issues
BACKGROUND: In the context of ever-growing health expenditure and limited resources, economic evaluations aid in making evidence-informed policy decisions. Cost-utility analysis (CUA) is often used, and CUA data synthesis is also desirable, but methodological issues are challenged. Hence, we aim to...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8845252/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35168619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07595-1 |
_version_ | 1784651633378983936 |
---|---|
author | Bagepally, Bhavani Shankara Chaikledkaew, Usa Chaiyakunapruk, Nathorn Attia, John Thakkinstian, Ammarin |
author_facet | Bagepally, Bhavani Shankara Chaikledkaew, Usa Chaiyakunapruk, Nathorn Attia, John Thakkinstian, Ammarin |
author_sort | Bagepally, Bhavani Shankara |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In the context of ever-growing health expenditure and limited resources, economic evaluations aid in making evidence-informed policy decisions. Cost-utility analysis (CUA) is often used, and CUA data synthesis is also desirable, but methodological issues are challenged. Hence, we aim to provide a step-by-step process to prepare the CUA data for meta-analysis. METHODS: Data harmonisation methods were constructed specifically considering CUA methodology, including inconsistent reports, economic parameters, heterogeneity (i.e., country’s income, time horizon, perspective, modelling approaches, currency, willingness to pay). An incremental net benefit (INB) and its variance were estimated and pooled across studies using a basic meta-analysis by COMER. RESULTS: Five scenarios show how to obtain INB and variance with various reported data: Study reports the mean and variance (Scenario 1) or 95% confidence interval (Scenario 2) of ΔC, ΔE, and ICER for INB/variance calculations. Scenario 3: ΔC, ΔE, and variances are available, but not for the ICER; a Monte Carlo was used to simulate ΔC and ΔE data, variance and covariance can be then estimated leading INB calculation. Scenario-4: Only the CE plane was available, ΔC and ΔE data can be extracted; means of ΔC, ΔE, and variance/covariance can be estimated accordingly, leading to INB/variance estimates. Scenario-5: Only mean cost/outcomes and ICER are available but not for variance and the CE-plane. A variance INB can be borrowed from other studies which are similar characteristics, including country income, ICERs, intervention-comparator, time period, country region, and model type and inputs (i.e., discounting, time horizon). CONCLUSION: Out data harmonisation and meta-analytic methods should be useful for researchers for the synthesis of economic evidence to aid policymakers in decision making. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-07595-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8845252 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88452522022-02-16 Meta-analysis of economic evaluation studies: data harmonisation and methodological issues Bagepally, Bhavani Shankara Chaikledkaew, Usa Chaiyakunapruk, Nathorn Attia, John Thakkinstian, Ammarin BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: In the context of ever-growing health expenditure and limited resources, economic evaluations aid in making evidence-informed policy decisions. Cost-utility analysis (CUA) is often used, and CUA data synthesis is also desirable, but methodological issues are challenged. Hence, we aim to provide a step-by-step process to prepare the CUA data for meta-analysis. METHODS: Data harmonisation methods were constructed specifically considering CUA methodology, including inconsistent reports, economic parameters, heterogeneity (i.e., country’s income, time horizon, perspective, modelling approaches, currency, willingness to pay). An incremental net benefit (INB) and its variance were estimated and pooled across studies using a basic meta-analysis by COMER. RESULTS: Five scenarios show how to obtain INB and variance with various reported data: Study reports the mean and variance (Scenario 1) or 95% confidence interval (Scenario 2) of ΔC, ΔE, and ICER for INB/variance calculations. Scenario 3: ΔC, ΔE, and variances are available, but not for the ICER; a Monte Carlo was used to simulate ΔC and ΔE data, variance and covariance can be then estimated leading INB calculation. Scenario-4: Only the CE plane was available, ΔC and ΔE data can be extracted; means of ΔC, ΔE, and variance/covariance can be estimated accordingly, leading to INB/variance estimates. Scenario-5: Only mean cost/outcomes and ICER are available but not for variance and the CE-plane. A variance INB can be borrowed from other studies which are similar characteristics, including country income, ICERs, intervention-comparator, time period, country region, and model type and inputs (i.e., discounting, time horizon). CONCLUSION: Out data harmonisation and meta-analytic methods should be useful for researchers for the synthesis of economic evidence to aid policymakers in decision making. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-07595-1. BioMed Central 2022-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8845252/ /pubmed/35168619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07595-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Bagepally, Bhavani Shankara Chaikledkaew, Usa Chaiyakunapruk, Nathorn Attia, John Thakkinstian, Ammarin Meta-analysis of economic evaluation studies: data harmonisation and methodological issues |
title | Meta-analysis of economic evaluation studies: data harmonisation and methodological issues |
title_full | Meta-analysis of economic evaluation studies: data harmonisation and methodological issues |
title_fullStr | Meta-analysis of economic evaluation studies: data harmonisation and methodological issues |
title_full_unstemmed | Meta-analysis of economic evaluation studies: data harmonisation and methodological issues |
title_short | Meta-analysis of economic evaluation studies: data harmonisation and methodological issues |
title_sort | meta-analysis of economic evaluation studies: data harmonisation and methodological issues |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8845252/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35168619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07595-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bagepallybhavanishankara metaanalysisofeconomicevaluationstudiesdataharmonisationandmethodologicalissues AT chaikledkaewusa metaanalysisofeconomicevaluationstudiesdataharmonisationandmethodologicalissues AT chaiyakunapruknathorn metaanalysisofeconomicevaluationstudiesdataharmonisationandmethodologicalissues AT attiajohn metaanalysisofeconomicevaluationstudiesdataharmonisationandmethodologicalissues AT thakkinstianammarin metaanalysisofeconomicevaluationstudiesdataharmonisationandmethodologicalissues |