Cargando…

Reevaluating scorpion ecomorphs using a naïve approach

BACKGROUND: Ecomorphs create the opportunity to investigate ecological adaptation because they encompass organisms that evolved characteristic morphologies under similar ecological demands. For over 50 years, scorpions have been empirically assigned to ecomorphs based on the characteristic morpholog...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coelho, Pedro, Kaliontzopoulou, Antigoni, Sousa, Pedro, Stockmann, Mark, van der Meijden, Arie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8845257/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35164666
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12862-022-01968-0
_version_ 1784651634648809472
author Coelho, Pedro
Kaliontzopoulou, Antigoni
Sousa, Pedro
Stockmann, Mark
van der Meijden, Arie
author_facet Coelho, Pedro
Kaliontzopoulou, Antigoni
Sousa, Pedro
Stockmann, Mark
van der Meijden, Arie
author_sort Coelho, Pedro
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ecomorphs create the opportunity to investigate ecological adaptation because they encompass organisms that evolved characteristic morphologies under similar ecological demands. For over 50 years, scorpions have been empirically assigned to ecomorphs based on the characteristic morphologies that rock, sand, vegetation, underground, and surface dwellers assume. This study aims to independently test the existence of scorpion ecomorphs by quantifying the association between their morphology and ecology across 61 species, representing 14 families of the Scorpiones order. RESULTS: Without a priori categorization of species into ecomorphs, we identified four groups based on microhabitat descriptors, which reflect how scorpion ecospace is clustered. Moreover, these microhabitat groups, i.e., ecotypes, have significantly divergent morphologies; therefore, they represent ecomorphs. These ecomorphs largely correspond with the ones previously described in the literature. Therefore, we retained the names Lithophilous, Psammophilous, and Pelophilous, and proposed the name Phytophilous for vegetation dwellers. Finally, we sought to map the morphology-ecology association in scorpions and found that the morphological regions most tightly associated with ecology are at the extremities. Moreover, the major trend in ecomorphological covariation is that longer walking legs and relatively slender pedipalps (pincers) are associated with sandy microhabitats, while the inverse morphological proportions are associated with rocky microhabitats. CONCLUSIONS: Scorpion ecomorphs are validated in a naïve approach, from ecological descriptors and whole body anatomy. This places them on a more solid quantitative footing for future studies of ecological adaptation in scorpions. Our results verify most of the previously defined ecomorphotypes and could be used as a current practice to understand the adaptive significance of ecological morphology. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12862-022-01968-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8845257
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88452572022-02-16 Reevaluating scorpion ecomorphs using a naïve approach Coelho, Pedro Kaliontzopoulou, Antigoni Sousa, Pedro Stockmann, Mark van der Meijden, Arie BMC Ecol Evol Research BACKGROUND: Ecomorphs create the opportunity to investigate ecological adaptation because they encompass organisms that evolved characteristic morphologies under similar ecological demands. For over 50 years, scorpions have been empirically assigned to ecomorphs based on the characteristic morphologies that rock, sand, vegetation, underground, and surface dwellers assume. This study aims to independently test the existence of scorpion ecomorphs by quantifying the association between their morphology and ecology across 61 species, representing 14 families of the Scorpiones order. RESULTS: Without a priori categorization of species into ecomorphs, we identified four groups based on microhabitat descriptors, which reflect how scorpion ecospace is clustered. Moreover, these microhabitat groups, i.e., ecotypes, have significantly divergent morphologies; therefore, they represent ecomorphs. These ecomorphs largely correspond with the ones previously described in the literature. Therefore, we retained the names Lithophilous, Psammophilous, and Pelophilous, and proposed the name Phytophilous for vegetation dwellers. Finally, we sought to map the morphology-ecology association in scorpions and found that the morphological regions most tightly associated with ecology are at the extremities. Moreover, the major trend in ecomorphological covariation is that longer walking legs and relatively slender pedipalps (pincers) are associated with sandy microhabitats, while the inverse morphological proportions are associated with rocky microhabitats. CONCLUSIONS: Scorpion ecomorphs are validated in a naïve approach, from ecological descriptors and whole body anatomy. This places them on a more solid quantitative footing for future studies of ecological adaptation in scorpions. Our results verify most of the previously defined ecomorphotypes and could be used as a current practice to understand the adaptive significance of ecological morphology. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12862-022-01968-0. BioMed Central 2022-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8845257/ /pubmed/35164666 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12862-022-01968-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Coelho, Pedro
Kaliontzopoulou, Antigoni
Sousa, Pedro
Stockmann, Mark
van der Meijden, Arie
Reevaluating scorpion ecomorphs using a naïve approach
title Reevaluating scorpion ecomorphs using a naïve approach
title_full Reevaluating scorpion ecomorphs using a naïve approach
title_fullStr Reevaluating scorpion ecomorphs using a naïve approach
title_full_unstemmed Reevaluating scorpion ecomorphs using a naïve approach
title_short Reevaluating scorpion ecomorphs using a naïve approach
title_sort reevaluating scorpion ecomorphs using a naïve approach
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8845257/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35164666
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12862-022-01968-0
work_keys_str_mv AT coelhopedro reevaluatingscorpionecomorphsusinganaiveapproach
AT kaliontzopoulouantigoni reevaluatingscorpionecomorphsusinganaiveapproach
AT sousapedro reevaluatingscorpionecomorphsusinganaiveapproach
AT stockmannmark reevaluatingscorpionecomorphsusinganaiveapproach
AT vandermeijdenarie reevaluatingscorpionecomorphsusinganaiveapproach