Cargando…
Evaluating the development, woman-centricity and psychometric properties of maternity patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs): A systematic review protocol
INTRODUCTION: Woman-centred care is the right of every woman receiving maternity care, irrespective of where care is being received and who is providing care. This protocol describes a planned systematic review that will identify, describe and critically appraise the psychometric properties of mater...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8845328/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35144957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058952 |
_version_ | 1784651652220846080 |
---|---|
author | Bull, Claudia Teede, Helena Carrandi, Lane Rigney, Azure Cusack, Sally Callander, Emily |
author_facet | Bull, Claudia Teede, Helena Carrandi, Lane Rigney, Azure Cusack, Sally Callander, Emily |
author_sort | Bull, Claudia |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Woman-centred care is the right of every woman receiving maternity care, irrespective of where care is being received and who is providing care. This protocol describes a planned systematic review that will identify, describe and critically appraise the psychometric properties of maternity patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs). The woman-centricity of PROM and PREM development and content validation (ie, the extent to which women were involved in these processes) will also be assessed. This information will be used to develop a maternity PROMs and PREMs database to support service and system performance measurement, and value-based maternity care initiatives. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study will be guided by the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guideline for systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments. Studies identified via MEDLINE, CINAHL Plus, PsycINFO and EMBASE describing the development, content validation and/or psychometric evaluation of PROMs and PREMs specifically designed for maternity populations throughout pregnancy, childbirth and postnatal periods will be considered if published from 2010 onward, in English, and available in full text. The COSMIN risk of bias checklist will be used to evaluate the quality of studies reporting on the development, content validation and/or psychometric evaluation of PROMs and PREMs. COSMIN criteria for good content validity will be used to assess the woman-centricity of PROM and PREM development and content validation studies. COSMIN standards of good psychometric properties will be used to evaluate the validity and reliability of the identified instruments. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical permission for this research is not required. The findings of this research will be submitted for publication in an international, peer-reviewed journal. Abstracts for national and international conference presentations will also be submitted. The proposed maternity PROMs and PREMs database will be freely accessible online, and developed with consumer input to ensure its usefulness to a range of maternity care stakeholders. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021288854. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8845328 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88453282022-03-01 Evaluating the development, woman-centricity and psychometric properties of maternity patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs): A systematic review protocol Bull, Claudia Teede, Helena Carrandi, Lane Rigney, Azure Cusack, Sally Callander, Emily BMJ Open Health Services Research INTRODUCTION: Woman-centred care is the right of every woman receiving maternity care, irrespective of where care is being received and who is providing care. This protocol describes a planned systematic review that will identify, describe and critically appraise the psychometric properties of maternity patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs). The woman-centricity of PROM and PREM development and content validation (ie, the extent to which women were involved in these processes) will also be assessed. This information will be used to develop a maternity PROMs and PREMs database to support service and system performance measurement, and value-based maternity care initiatives. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study will be guided by the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guideline for systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments. Studies identified via MEDLINE, CINAHL Plus, PsycINFO and EMBASE describing the development, content validation and/or psychometric evaluation of PROMs and PREMs specifically designed for maternity populations throughout pregnancy, childbirth and postnatal periods will be considered if published from 2010 onward, in English, and available in full text. The COSMIN risk of bias checklist will be used to evaluate the quality of studies reporting on the development, content validation and/or psychometric evaluation of PROMs and PREMs. COSMIN criteria for good content validity will be used to assess the woman-centricity of PROM and PREM development and content validation studies. COSMIN standards of good psychometric properties will be used to evaluate the validity and reliability of the identified instruments. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical permission for this research is not required. The findings of this research will be submitted for publication in an international, peer-reviewed journal. Abstracts for national and international conference presentations will also be submitted. The proposed maternity PROMs and PREMs database will be freely accessible online, and developed with consumer input to ensure its usefulness to a range of maternity care stakeholders. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021288854. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8845328/ /pubmed/35144957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058952 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Health Services Research Bull, Claudia Teede, Helena Carrandi, Lane Rigney, Azure Cusack, Sally Callander, Emily Evaluating the development, woman-centricity and psychometric properties of maternity patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs): A systematic review protocol |
title | Evaluating the development, woman-centricity and psychometric properties of maternity patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs): A systematic review protocol |
title_full | Evaluating the development, woman-centricity and psychometric properties of maternity patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs): A systematic review protocol |
title_fullStr | Evaluating the development, woman-centricity and psychometric properties of maternity patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs): A systematic review protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating the development, woman-centricity and psychometric properties of maternity patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs): A systematic review protocol |
title_short | Evaluating the development, woman-centricity and psychometric properties of maternity patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs): A systematic review protocol |
title_sort | evaluating the development, woman-centricity and psychometric properties of maternity patient-reported outcome measures (proms) and patient-reported experience measures (prems): a systematic review protocol |
topic | Health Services Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8845328/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35144957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058952 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bullclaudia evaluatingthedevelopmentwomancentricityandpsychometricpropertiesofmaternitypatientreportedoutcomemeasurespromsandpatientreportedexperiencemeasurespremsasystematicreviewprotocol AT teedehelena evaluatingthedevelopmentwomancentricityandpsychometricpropertiesofmaternitypatientreportedoutcomemeasurespromsandpatientreportedexperiencemeasurespremsasystematicreviewprotocol AT carrandilane evaluatingthedevelopmentwomancentricityandpsychometricpropertiesofmaternitypatientreportedoutcomemeasurespromsandpatientreportedexperiencemeasurespremsasystematicreviewprotocol AT rigneyazure evaluatingthedevelopmentwomancentricityandpsychometricpropertiesofmaternitypatientreportedoutcomemeasurespromsandpatientreportedexperiencemeasurespremsasystematicreviewprotocol AT cusacksally evaluatingthedevelopmentwomancentricityandpsychometricpropertiesofmaternitypatientreportedoutcomemeasurespromsandpatientreportedexperiencemeasurespremsasystematicreviewprotocol AT callanderemily evaluatingthedevelopmentwomancentricityandpsychometricpropertiesofmaternitypatientreportedoutcomemeasurespromsandpatientreportedexperiencemeasurespremsasystematicreviewprotocol |