Cargando…
Validating the use of the revised childbirth experience questionnaire in Hong Kong
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the traditional Chinese version of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ 2.0) and assess the childbirth experiences of Chinese women. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in Hong Kong from July 2020 to February 2021. In total, 9...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8845391/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35168552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04456-x |
_version_ | 1784651666675466240 |
---|---|
author | Lok, Kris Y. W. Fan, Heidi S. L. Ko, Rachel W. T. Kwok, Jojo Y. Y. Wong, Janet Y. H. Fong, Daniel Y. T. Shek, Noel W. M. Ngan, Hextan Y. S. Choi, Edmond P. H. |
author_facet | Lok, Kris Y. W. Fan, Heidi S. L. Ko, Rachel W. T. Kwok, Jojo Y. Y. Wong, Janet Y. H. Fong, Daniel Y. T. Shek, Noel W. M. Ngan, Hextan Y. S. Choi, Edmond P. H. |
author_sort | Lok, Kris Y. W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the traditional Chinese version of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ 2.0) and assess the childbirth experiences of Chinese women. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in Hong Kong from July 2020 to February 2021. In total, 975 mothers, who could read traditional Chinese and gave birth in 2020 or 2021, were included in the analysis. Data were fitted into the model proposed by the original developers using the confirmatory factor analysis. The data were then randomly split into training and validation sets for exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Childbirth experiences were assessed. Factor structure, internal construct validity, internal consistency, and known-group validity were assessed. RESULTS: The originally proposed CEQ2.0 model showed a poor fit. An exploratory factor analysis identified a revised four-factor model (CEQ2.0-R) on a randomly split sample, which showed a satisfactory fit (CFI=0.912; TLI=0.884; SRMR=.053; RMSEA=0.072) on the other split sample. The revised scale comprised 13 items and four domains: (1)“Own capacity” (6 items), (2) “General support” (3 items), (3) “Perceived safety” (2 items), and (4) “Professional support” (2 items). CEQ2.0-R showed high internal construct validity and reliability. It can differentiate between participants with different characteristics, including parity, oxytocin augmentation, and companionship during labour. The childbirth experiences of the participants were merely positive, and participants reported that more support from midwives is needed. CONCLUSIONS: CEQ2.0-R can adequately describe the childbirth experiences of women in Hong Kong. The questionnaire is easy to be administer and can be used to assess several domains of the childbirth experiences. It may be useful to evaluate the aspects of support needed during childbirth. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-022-04456-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8845391 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88453912022-02-16 Validating the use of the revised childbirth experience questionnaire in Hong Kong Lok, Kris Y. W. Fan, Heidi S. L. Ko, Rachel W. T. Kwok, Jojo Y. Y. Wong, Janet Y. H. Fong, Daniel Y. T. Shek, Noel W. M. Ngan, Hextan Y. S. Choi, Edmond P. H. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the traditional Chinese version of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ 2.0) and assess the childbirth experiences of Chinese women. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in Hong Kong from July 2020 to February 2021. In total, 975 mothers, who could read traditional Chinese and gave birth in 2020 or 2021, were included in the analysis. Data were fitted into the model proposed by the original developers using the confirmatory factor analysis. The data were then randomly split into training and validation sets for exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Childbirth experiences were assessed. Factor structure, internal construct validity, internal consistency, and known-group validity were assessed. RESULTS: The originally proposed CEQ2.0 model showed a poor fit. An exploratory factor analysis identified a revised four-factor model (CEQ2.0-R) on a randomly split sample, which showed a satisfactory fit (CFI=0.912; TLI=0.884; SRMR=.053; RMSEA=0.072) on the other split sample. The revised scale comprised 13 items and four domains: (1)“Own capacity” (6 items), (2) “General support” (3 items), (3) “Perceived safety” (2 items), and (4) “Professional support” (2 items). CEQ2.0-R showed high internal construct validity and reliability. It can differentiate between participants with different characteristics, including parity, oxytocin augmentation, and companionship during labour. The childbirth experiences of the participants were merely positive, and participants reported that more support from midwives is needed. CONCLUSIONS: CEQ2.0-R can adequately describe the childbirth experiences of women in Hong Kong. The questionnaire is easy to be administer and can be used to assess several domains of the childbirth experiences. It may be useful to evaluate the aspects of support needed during childbirth. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-022-04456-x. BioMed Central 2022-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8845391/ /pubmed/35168552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04456-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Lok, Kris Y. W. Fan, Heidi S. L. Ko, Rachel W. T. Kwok, Jojo Y. Y. Wong, Janet Y. H. Fong, Daniel Y. T. Shek, Noel W. M. Ngan, Hextan Y. S. Choi, Edmond P. H. Validating the use of the revised childbirth experience questionnaire in Hong Kong |
title | Validating the use of the revised childbirth experience questionnaire in Hong Kong |
title_full | Validating the use of the revised childbirth experience questionnaire in Hong Kong |
title_fullStr | Validating the use of the revised childbirth experience questionnaire in Hong Kong |
title_full_unstemmed | Validating the use of the revised childbirth experience questionnaire in Hong Kong |
title_short | Validating the use of the revised childbirth experience questionnaire in Hong Kong |
title_sort | validating the use of the revised childbirth experience questionnaire in hong kong |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8845391/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35168552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04456-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lokkrisyw validatingtheuseoftherevisedchildbirthexperiencequestionnaireinhongkong AT fanheidisl validatingtheuseoftherevisedchildbirthexperiencequestionnaireinhongkong AT korachelwt validatingtheuseoftherevisedchildbirthexperiencequestionnaireinhongkong AT kwokjojoyy validatingtheuseoftherevisedchildbirthexperiencequestionnaireinhongkong AT wongjanetyh validatingtheuseoftherevisedchildbirthexperiencequestionnaireinhongkong AT fongdanielyt validatingtheuseoftherevisedchildbirthexperiencequestionnaireinhongkong AT sheknoelwm validatingtheuseoftherevisedchildbirthexperiencequestionnaireinhongkong AT nganhextanys validatingtheuseoftherevisedchildbirthexperiencequestionnaireinhongkong AT choiedmondph validatingtheuseoftherevisedchildbirthexperiencequestionnaireinhongkong |