Cargando…

Neurocognitive Screening in Patients Following SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Tools for Triage

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Cognitive complaints are common in patients recovering from Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), yet their etiology is often unclear. We assess factors that contribute to cognitive impairment in ambulatory versus hospitalized patients during the sub-acute stage of recovery. M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blackmon, Karen, Day, Gregory S., Powers, Harry Ross, Bosch, Wendelyn, Prabhakaran, Divya, Woolston, Dixie, Pedraza, Otto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Journal Experts 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8845509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35169789
http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1127420/v1
_version_ 1784651686730530816
author Blackmon, Karen
Day, Gregory S.
Powers, Harry Ross
Bosch, Wendelyn
Prabhakaran, Divya
Woolston, Dixie
Pedraza, Otto
author_facet Blackmon, Karen
Day, Gregory S.
Powers, Harry Ross
Bosch, Wendelyn
Prabhakaran, Divya
Woolston, Dixie
Pedraza, Otto
author_sort Blackmon, Karen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Cognitive complaints are common in patients recovering from Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), yet their etiology is often unclear. We assess factors that contribute to cognitive impairment in ambulatory versus hospitalized patients during the sub-acute stage of recovery. METHODS: Participants were prospectively recruited from a hospital-wide registry. All patients tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection using a real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase-chain-reaction assay. Patients ≤ 18 years-of-age and those with a pre-existing major neurocognitive disorder were excluded. Participants completed an extensive neuropsychological questionnaire and a computerized cognitive screen via remote telemedicine platform. Rates of subjective and objective neuropsychological impairment were compared between the ambulatory and hospitalized groups. Factors associated with impairment were explored separately within each group. RESULTS: A total of 102 patients (76 ambulatory, 26 hospitalized) completed the symptom inventory and neurocognitive tests 24 ± 22 days following laboratory confirmation of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Hospitalized and ambulatory patients self-reported high rates of cognitive impairment (27-40%), without differences between the groups. However, hospitalized patients showed higher rates of objective impairment in visual memory (30% vs. 4%; p=0.001) and psychomotor speed (41% vs. 15%; p=0.008). Objective cognitive test performance was associated with anxiety, depression, fatigue, and pain in the ambulatory but not the hospitalized group. CONCLUSIONS: Focal cognitive deficits are more common in hospitalized than ambulatory patients. Cognitive performance is associated with neuropsychiatric symptoms in ambulatory but not hospitalized patients. Objective neurocognitive measures can provide essential information to inform neurologic triage and should be included as endpoints in clinical trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8845509
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Journal Experts
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88455092022-02-16 Neurocognitive Screening in Patients Following SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Tools for Triage Blackmon, Karen Day, Gregory S. Powers, Harry Ross Bosch, Wendelyn Prabhakaran, Divya Woolston, Dixie Pedraza, Otto Res Sq Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Cognitive complaints are common in patients recovering from Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), yet their etiology is often unclear. We assess factors that contribute to cognitive impairment in ambulatory versus hospitalized patients during the sub-acute stage of recovery. METHODS: Participants were prospectively recruited from a hospital-wide registry. All patients tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection using a real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase-chain-reaction assay. Patients ≤ 18 years-of-age and those with a pre-existing major neurocognitive disorder were excluded. Participants completed an extensive neuropsychological questionnaire and a computerized cognitive screen via remote telemedicine platform. Rates of subjective and objective neuropsychological impairment were compared between the ambulatory and hospitalized groups. Factors associated with impairment were explored separately within each group. RESULTS: A total of 102 patients (76 ambulatory, 26 hospitalized) completed the symptom inventory and neurocognitive tests 24 ± 22 days following laboratory confirmation of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Hospitalized and ambulatory patients self-reported high rates of cognitive impairment (27-40%), without differences between the groups. However, hospitalized patients showed higher rates of objective impairment in visual memory (30% vs. 4%; p=0.001) and psychomotor speed (41% vs. 15%; p=0.008). Objective cognitive test performance was associated with anxiety, depression, fatigue, and pain in the ambulatory but not the hospitalized group. CONCLUSIONS: Focal cognitive deficits are more common in hospitalized than ambulatory patients. Cognitive performance is associated with neuropsychiatric symptoms in ambulatory but not hospitalized patients. Objective neurocognitive measures can provide essential information to inform neurologic triage and should be included as endpoints in clinical trials. American Journal Experts 2022-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8845509/ /pubmed/35169789 http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1127420/v1 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle Article
Blackmon, Karen
Day, Gregory S.
Powers, Harry Ross
Bosch, Wendelyn
Prabhakaran, Divya
Woolston, Dixie
Pedraza, Otto
Neurocognitive Screening in Patients Following SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Tools for Triage
title Neurocognitive Screening in Patients Following SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Tools for Triage
title_full Neurocognitive Screening in Patients Following SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Tools for Triage
title_fullStr Neurocognitive Screening in Patients Following SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Tools for Triage
title_full_unstemmed Neurocognitive Screening in Patients Following SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Tools for Triage
title_short Neurocognitive Screening in Patients Following SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Tools for Triage
title_sort neurocognitive screening in patients following sars-cov-2 infection: tools for triage
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8845509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35169789
http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1127420/v1
work_keys_str_mv AT blackmonkaren neurocognitivescreeninginpatientsfollowingsarscov2infectiontoolsfortriage
AT daygregorys neurocognitivescreeninginpatientsfollowingsarscov2infectiontoolsfortriage
AT powersharryross neurocognitivescreeninginpatientsfollowingsarscov2infectiontoolsfortriage
AT boschwendelyn neurocognitivescreeninginpatientsfollowingsarscov2infectiontoolsfortriage
AT prabhakarandivya neurocognitivescreeninginpatientsfollowingsarscov2infectiontoolsfortriage
AT woolstondixie neurocognitivescreeninginpatientsfollowingsarscov2infectiontoolsfortriage
AT pedrazaotto neurocognitivescreeninginpatientsfollowingsarscov2infectiontoolsfortriage