Cargando…

Forearm and Arm Tourniquet Tolerance

In distal upper extremity surgeries, there can be a choice to use an upper arm or forearm tourniquet. This study examines discomfort and tolerance in healthy volunteers to determine whether one is more comfortable. METHODS: Forty healthy, study participants were randomized to an upper extremity late...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lefebvre, Rachel, Cohen, Landon, Kay, Harrison Ford, Mostofi, Amir, Ghiassi, Alidad, Stevanovic, Milan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8846271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35167505
http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00229
_version_ 1784651828715061248
author Lefebvre, Rachel
Cohen, Landon
Kay, Harrison Ford
Mostofi, Amir
Ghiassi, Alidad
Stevanovic, Milan
author_facet Lefebvre, Rachel
Cohen, Landon
Kay, Harrison Ford
Mostofi, Amir
Ghiassi, Alidad
Stevanovic, Milan
author_sort Lefebvre, Rachel
collection PubMed
description In distal upper extremity surgeries, there can be a choice to use an upper arm or forearm tourniquet. This study examines discomfort and tolerance in healthy volunteers to determine whether one is more comfortable. METHODS: Forty healthy, study participants were randomized to an upper extremity laterality and site. Tourniquets were inflated to 100 mm Hg over systolic blood pressure. Participants experienced an upper arm and a forearm tourniquet sequentially. Visual analog scores (VAS) were recorded at 2-minute intervals. Time until request and VAS at tourniquet deflation were recorded. Time until the complete resolution of paresthesias was also recorded. Participants subjectively stated which tourniquet felt more comfortable. RESULTS: Tourniquets were inflated longer on the forearm than the upper arm (mean 16.1 minutes versus 12.2 minutes; P < 0.0001). VAS at tourniquet removal was not different between the sites (means 7.3 and 7.3) (P = 0.839). Time until paresthesia resolution after the tourniquet was deflated was not different (means 8.1 and 7.7 minutes) (P = 0.675). Time until paresthesia resolution was proportional to tourniquet inflation time for both sites (regression coefficient 0.41; P < 0.00001). Participants found the forearm more comfortable (95% confidence interval, 0.63 to 0.92). CONCLUSION: Forearm placement allows the tourniquet to be inflated for an average of 4 minutes longer. Forearm tourniquet is subjectively more comfortable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8846271
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88462712022-02-18 Forearm and Arm Tourniquet Tolerance Lefebvre, Rachel Cohen, Landon Kay, Harrison Ford Mostofi, Amir Ghiassi, Alidad Stevanovic, Milan J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev Research Article In distal upper extremity surgeries, there can be a choice to use an upper arm or forearm tourniquet. This study examines discomfort and tolerance in healthy volunteers to determine whether one is more comfortable. METHODS: Forty healthy, study participants were randomized to an upper extremity laterality and site. Tourniquets were inflated to 100 mm Hg over systolic blood pressure. Participants experienced an upper arm and a forearm tourniquet sequentially. Visual analog scores (VAS) were recorded at 2-minute intervals. Time until request and VAS at tourniquet deflation were recorded. Time until the complete resolution of paresthesias was also recorded. Participants subjectively stated which tourniquet felt more comfortable. RESULTS: Tourniquets were inflated longer on the forearm than the upper arm (mean 16.1 minutes versus 12.2 minutes; P < 0.0001). VAS at tourniquet removal was not different between the sites (means 7.3 and 7.3) (P = 0.839). Time until paresthesia resolution after the tourniquet was deflated was not different (means 8.1 and 7.7 minutes) (P = 0.675). Time until paresthesia resolution was proportional to tourniquet inflation time for both sites (regression coefficient 0.41; P < 0.00001). Participants found the forearm more comfortable (95% confidence interval, 0.63 to 0.92). CONCLUSION: Forearm placement allows the tourniquet to be inflated for an average of 4 minutes longer. Forearm tourniquet is subjectively more comfortable. Wolters Kluwer 2022-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8846271/ /pubmed/35167505 http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00229 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lefebvre, Rachel
Cohen, Landon
Kay, Harrison Ford
Mostofi, Amir
Ghiassi, Alidad
Stevanovic, Milan
Forearm and Arm Tourniquet Tolerance
title Forearm and Arm Tourniquet Tolerance
title_full Forearm and Arm Tourniquet Tolerance
title_fullStr Forearm and Arm Tourniquet Tolerance
title_full_unstemmed Forearm and Arm Tourniquet Tolerance
title_short Forearm and Arm Tourniquet Tolerance
title_sort forearm and arm tourniquet tolerance
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8846271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35167505
http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00229
work_keys_str_mv AT lefebvrerachel forearmandarmtourniquettolerance
AT cohenlandon forearmandarmtourniquettolerance
AT kayharrisonford forearmandarmtourniquettolerance
AT mostofiamir forearmandarmtourniquettolerance
AT ghiassialidad forearmandarmtourniquettolerance
AT stevanovicmilan forearmandarmtourniquettolerance