Cargando…
Forearm and Arm Tourniquet Tolerance
In distal upper extremity surgeries, there can be a choice to use an upper arm or forearm tourniquet. This study examines discomfort and tolerance in healthy volunteers to determine whether one is more comfortable. METHODS: Forty healthy, study participants were randomized to an upper extremity late...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8846271/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35167505 http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00229 |
_version_ | 1784651828715061248 |
---|---|
author | Lefebvre, Rachel Cohen, Landon Kay, Harrison Ford Mostofi, Amir Ghiassi, Alidad Stevanovic, Milan |
author_facet | Lefebvre, Rachel Cohen, Landon Kay, Harrison Ford Mostofi, Amir Ghiassi, Alidad Stevanovic, Milan |
author_sort | Lefebvre, Rachel |
collection | PubMed |
description | In distal upper extremity surgeries, there can be a choice to use an upper arm or forearm tourniquet. This study examines discomfort and tolerance in healthy volunteers to determine whether one is more comfortable. METHODS: Forty healthy, study participants were randomized to an upper extremity laterality and site. Tourniquets were inflated to 100 mm Hg over systolic blood pressure. Participants experienced an upper arm and a forearm tourniquet sequentially. Visual analog scores (VAS) were recorded at 2-minute intervals. Time until request and VAS at tourniquet deflation were recorded. Time until the complete resolution of paresthesias was also recorded. Participants subjectively stated which tourniquet felt more comfortable. RESULTS: Tourniquets were inflated longer on the forearm than the upper arm (mean 16.1 minutes versus 12.2 minutes; P < 0.0001). VAS at tourniquet removal was not different between the sites (means 7.3 and 7.3) (P = 0.839). Time until paresthesia resolution after the tourniquet was deflated was not different (means 8.1 and 7.7 minutes) (P = 0.675). Time until paresthesia resolution was proportional to tourniquet inflation time for both sites (regression coefficient 0.41; P < 0.00001). Participants found the forearm more comfortable (95% confidence interval, 0.63 to 0.92). CONCLUSION: Forearm placement allows the tourniquet to be inflated for an average of 4 minutes longer. Forearm tourniquet is subjectively more comfortable. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8846271 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88462712022-02-18 Forearm and Arm Tourniquet Tolerance Lefebvre, Rachel Cohen, Landon Kay, Harrison Ford Mostofi, Amir Ghiassi, Alidad Stevanovic, Milan J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev Research Article In distal upper extremity surgeries, there can be a choice to use an upper arm or forearm tourniquet. This study examines discomfort and tolerance in healthy volunteers to determine whether one is more comfortable. METHODS: Forty healthy, study participants were randomized to an upper extremity laterality and site. Tourniquets were inflated to 100 mm Hg over systolic blood pressure. Participants experienced an upper arm and a forearm tourniquet sequentially. Visual analog scores (VAS) were recorded at 2-minute intervals. Time until request and VAS at tourniquet deflation were recorded. Time until the complete resolution of paresthesias was also recorded. Participants subjectively stated which tourniquet felt more comfortable. RESULTS: Tourniquets were inflated longer on the forearm than the upper arm (mean 16.1 minutes versus 12.2 minutes; P < 0.0001). VAS at tourniquet removal was not different between the sites (means 7.3 and 7.3) (P = 0.839). Time until paresthesia resolution after the tourniquet was deflated was not different (means 8.1 and 7.7 minutes) (P = 0.675). Time until paresthesia resolution was proportional to tourniquet inflation time for both sites (regression coefficient 0.41; P < 0.00001). Participants found the forearm more comfortable (95% confidence interval, 0.63 to 0.92). CONCLUSION: Forearm placement allows the tourniquet to be inflated for an average of 4 minutes longer. Forearm tourniquet is subjectively more comfortable. Wolters Kluwer 2022-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8846271/ /pubmed/35167505 http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00229 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lefebvre, Rachel Cohen, Landon Kay, Harrison Ford Mostofi, Amir Ghiassi, Alidad Stevanovic, Milan Forearm and Arm Tourniquet Tolerance |
title | Forearm and Arm Tourniquet Tolerance |
title_full | Forearm and Arm Tourniquet Tolerance |
title_fullStr | Forearm and Arm Tourniquet Tolerance |
title_full_unstemmed | Forearm and Arm Tourniquet Tolerance |
title_short | Forearm and Arm Tourniquet Tolerance |
title_sort | forearm and arm tourniquet tolerance |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8846271/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35167505 http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00229 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lefebvrerachel forearmandarmtourniquettolerance AT cohenlandon forearmandarmtourniquettolerance AT kayharrisonford forearmandarmtourniquettolerance AT mostofiamir forearmandarmtourniquettolerance AT ghiassialidad forearmandarmtourniquettolerance AT stevanovicmilan forearmandarmtourniquettolerance |