Cargando…
Clinical and analytical evaluation of the Abbott AdviseDx quantitative SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay and comparison with two other serological tests
INTRODUCTION: Serological testing is an important tool to assist with assessing the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infections, the causative agent of COVID-19. A quantitative assay was recently developed by Abbott Laboratories to measures antibodies against the receptor binding domain of the spike pr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier B.V.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8847080/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35181288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jim.2022.113243 |
_version_ | 1784651971767042048 |
---|---|
author | Maine, Gabriel N. Krishnan, Subhashree Mallika Walewski, Kelly Trueman, Jillian Sykes, Elizabeth Sun, Qian |
author_facet | Maine, Gabriel N. Krishnan, Subhashree Mallika Walewski, Kelly Trueman, Jillian Sykes, Elizabeth Sun, Qian |
author_sort | Maine, Gabriel N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Serological testing is an important tool to assist with assessing the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infections, the causative agent of COVID-19. A quantitative assay was recently developed by Abbott Laboratories to measures antibodies against the receptor binding domain of the spike protein. In addition to assessing disease prevalence, this assay is useful towards determining the scale and duration of the humoral response to infection and vaccination. Here we evaluated the clinical and analytical performance of the quantitative Abbott AdviseDx SARS-CoV-2 IgG II assay and characterized the longitudinal dynamics of the IgG response against SARS-CoV-2 in 402 infected individuals up to 322 days post-symptom onset. METHODS: To assess test sensitivity, 1257 serum specimens derived from 402 patients positive for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR were analyzed on the Abbott Alinity platform. To evaluate test specificity, 394 specimens were tested from patients who were symptomatic but PCR negative for SARS-CoV-2, as well as 305 archived pre-pandemic samples. To further characterize test performance metrics, we evaluated assay precision and linearity. RESULTS: The Abbott AdviseDx SARS-CoV-2 IgG II assay exhibited diagnostic specificity of 99.02% using 305 pre − COVID-19 serum specimens and 98.73% using 394 PCR negative specimens. Using 1257 sequential serum samples collected from PCR-confirmed individuals, clinical test sensitivity of the assay was 39.7% at 3–7 days, 75.9% at 8–14 days, 95.6% at 15–21 days, and 98.7% at 4–5 weeks post-symptom onset. The assay is linear across the analytical measurement range claimed by the manufacturer (22–25,000 AU/mL) and exhibited good analytical precision. The median concentration of IgG increased steadily from <22 AU/mL at 3–7 days post-symptom onset, to a peak of 14,421 AU/mL at 6–7 weeks. Although antibody concentration started to decline at 8–9 weeks following symptom onset, all patients remained seropositive during the observation period. When the positivity rate of this assay was compared with the Abbott anti-NP IgG and EUROIMMUN anti-S1 IgG tests, clinical sensitivity of the Abbott AdviseDx SARS-CoV-2 IgG II assay was the highest at all time points with the exception of 4–5 weeks after symptom onset. CONCLUSION: The Abbott AdviseDx SARS-CoV-2 IgG II assay offers high test specificity and sensitivity across a broad reportable range. We anticipate this assay will be a useful towards quantitatively assessing the humoral immune response to COVID-19 infection and vaccination. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8847080 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier B.V. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88470802022-02-16 Clinical and analytical evaluation of the Abbott AdviseDx quantitative SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay and comparison with two other serological tests Maine, Gabriel N. Krishnan, Subhashree Mallika Walewski, Kelly Trueman, Jillian Sykes, Elizabeth Sun, Qian J Immunol Methods Article INTRODUCTION: Serological testing is an important tool to assist with assessing the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infections, the causative agent of COVID-19. A quantitative assay was recently developed by Abbott Laboratories to measures antibodies against the receptor binding domain of the spike protein. In addition to assessing disease prevalence, this assay is useful towards determining the scale and duration of the humoral response to infection and vaccination. Here we evaluated the clinical and analytical performance of the quantitative Abbott AdviseDx SARS-CoV-2 IgG II assay and characterized the longitudinal dynamics of the IgG response against SARS-CoV-2 in 402 infected individuals up to 322 days post-symptom onset. METHODS: To assess test sensitivity, 1257 serum specimens derived from 402 patients positive for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR were analyzed on the Abbott Alinity platform. To evaluate test specificity, 394 specimens were tested from patients who were symptomatic but PCR negative for SARS-CoV-2, as well as 305 archived pre-pandemic samples. To further characterize test performance metrics, we evaluated assay precision and linearity. RESULTS: The Abbott AdviseDx SARS-CoV-2 IgG II assay exhibited diagnostic specificity of 99.02% using 305 pre − COVID-19 serum specimens and 98.73% using 394 PCR negative specimens. Using 1257 sequential serum samples collected from PCR-confirmed individuals, clinical test sensitivity of the assay was 39.7% at 3–7 days, 75.9% at 8–14 days, 95.6% at 15–21 days, and 98.7% at 4–5 weeks post-symptom onset. The assay is linear across the analytical measurement range claimed by the manufacturer (22–25,000 AU/mL) and exhibited good analytical precision. The median concentration of IgG increased steadily from <22 AU/mL at 3–7 days post-symptom onset, to a peak of 14,421 AU/mL at 6–7 weeks. Although antibody concentration started to decline at 8–9 weeks following symptom onset, all patients remained seropositive during the observation period. When the positivity rate of this assay was compared with the Abbott anti-NP IgG and EUROIMMUN anti-S1 IgG tests, clinical sensitivity of the Abbott AdviseDx SARS-CoV-2 IgG II assay was the highest at all time points with the exception of 4–5 weeks after symptom onset. CONCLUSION: The Abbott AdviseDx SARS-CoV-2 IgG II assay offers high test specificity and sensitivity across a broad reportable range. We anticipate this assay will be a useful towards quantitatively assessing the humoral immune response to COVID-19 infection and vaccination. Elsevier B.V. 2022-04 2022-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8847080/ /pubmed/35181288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jim.2022.113243 Text en © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Maine, Gabriel N. Krishnan, Subhashree Mallika Walewski, Kelly Trueman, Jillian Sykes, Elizabeth Sun, Qian Clinical and analytical evaluation of the Abbott AdviseDx quantitative SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay and comparison with two other serological tests |
title | Clinical and analytical evaluation of the Abbott AdviseDx quantitative SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay and comparison with two other serological tests |
title_full | Clinical and analytical evaluation of the Abbott AdviseDx quantitative SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay and comparison with two other serological tests |
title_fullStr | Clinical and analytical evaluation of the Abbott AdviseDx quantitative SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay and comparison with two other serological tests |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical and analytical evaluation of the Abbott AdviseDx quantitative SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay and comparison with two other serological tests |
title_short | Clinical and analytical evaluation of the Abbott AdviseDx quantitative SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay and comparison with two other serological tests |
title_sort | clinical and analytical evaluation of the abbott advisedx quantitative sars-cov-2 igg assay and comparison with two other serological tests |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8847080/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35181288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jim.2022.113243 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mainegabrieln clinicalandanalyticalevaluationoftheabbottadvisedxquantitativesarscov2iggassayandcomparisonwithtwootherserologicaltests AT krishnansubhashreemallika clinicalandanalyticalevaluationoftheabbottadvisedxquantitativesarscov2iggassayandcomparisonwithtwootherserologicaltests AT walewskikelly clinicalandanalyticalevaluationoftheabbottadvisedxquantitativesarscov2iggassayandcomparisonwithtwootherserologicaltests AT truemanjillian clinicalandanalyticalevaluationoftheabbottadvisedxquantitativesarscov2iggassayandcomparisonwithtwootherserologicaltests AT sykeselizabeth clinicalandanalyticalevaluationoftheabbottadvisedxquantitativesarscov2iggassayandcomparisonwithtwootherserologicaltests AT sunqian clinicalandanalyticalevaluationoftheabbottadvisedxquantitativesarscov2iggassayandcomparisonwithtwootherserologicaltests |