Cargando…

Biomechanical Markers of Forward Hop-Landing After ACL-Reconstruction: A Pattern Recognition Approach

Biomechanical changes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) may be detrimental to long-term knee-joint health. We used pattern recognition to characterise biomechanical differences during the landing phase of a single-leg forward hop after ACLR. Experimental data from 66 individuals...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sritharan, Prasanna, Muñoz, Mario A., Pivonka, Peter, Bryant, Adam L., Mokhtarzadeh, Hossein, Perraton, Luke G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8847210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35099657
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10439-022-02921-4
_version_ 1784652003053404160
author Sritharan, Prasanna
Muñoz, Mario A.
Pivonka, Peter
Bryant, Adam L.
Mokhtarzadeh, Hossein
Perraton, Luke G.
author_facet Sritharan, Prasanna
Muñoz, Mario A.
Pivonka, Peter
Bryant, Adam L.
Mokhtarzadeh, Hossein
Perraton, Luke G.
author_sort Sritharan, Prasanna
collection PubMed
description Biomechanical changes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) may be detrimental to long-term knee-joint health. We used pattern recognition to characterise biomechanical differences during the landing phase of a single-leg forward hop after ACLR. Experimental data from 66 individuals 12-24 months post-ACLR (28.2 ± 6.3 years) and 32 controls (25.2 ± 4.8 years old) were input into a musculoskeletal modelling pipeline to calculate joint angles, joint moments and muscle forces. These waveforms were transformed into principal components (features), and input into a pattern recognition pipeline, which found 10 main distinguishing features (and 8 associated features) between ACLR and control landing biomechanics at significance [Formula: see text] . Our process identified known biomechanical characteristics post-ACLR: smaller knee flexion angle; less knee extensor moment; lower vasti, rectus femoris and hamstrings forces. Importantly, we found more novel and less well-understood adaptations: smaller ankle plantar flexor moment; lower soleus forces; and altered patterns of knee rotation angle, hip rotator moment and knee abduction moment. Crucially, we identified, with high certainty, subtle aberrations indicating landing instability in the ACLR group for: knee flexion and internal rotation angles and moments; hip rotation angles and moments; and lumbar rotator and bending moments. Our findings may benefit rehabilitation and assessment for return-to-sport 12–24 months post-ACLR. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10439-022-02921-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8847210
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88472102022-02-23 Biomechanical Markers of Forward Hop-Landing After ACL-Reconstruction: A Pattern Recognition Approach Sritharan, Prasanna Muñoz, Mario A. Pivonka, Peter Bryant, Adam L. Mokhtarzadeh, Hossein Perraton, Luke G. Ann Biomed Eng Original Article Biomechanical changes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) may be detrimental to long-term knee-joint health. We used pattern recognition to characterise biomechanical differences during the landing phase of a single-leg forward hop after ACLR. Experimental data from 66 individuals 12-24 months post-ACLR (28.2 ± 6.3 years) and 32 controls (25.2 ± 4.8 years old) were input into a musculoskeletal modelling pipeline to calculate joint angles, joint moments and muscle forces. These waveforms were transformed into principal components (features), and input into a pattern recognition pipeline, which found 10 main distinguishing features (and 8 associated features) between ACLR and control landing biomechanics at significance [Formula: see text] . Our process identified known biomechanical characteristics post-ACLR: smaller knee flexion angle; less knee extensor moment; lower vasti, rectus femoris and hamstrings forces. Importantly, we found more novel and less well-understood adaptations: smaller ankle plantar flexor moment; lower soleus forces; and altered patterns of knee rotation angle, hip rotator moment and knee abduction moment. Crucially, we identified, with high certainty, subtle aberrations indicating landing instability in the ACLR group for: knee flexion and internal rotation angles and moments; hip rotation angles and moments; and lumbar rotator and bending moments. Our findings may benefit rehabilitation and assessment for return-to-sport 12–24 months post-ACLR. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10439-022-02921-4. Springer International Publishing 2022-01-31 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8847210/ /pubmed/35099657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10439-022-02921-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Sritharan, Prasanna
Muñoz, Mario A.
Pivonka, Peter
Bryant, Adam L.
Mokhtarzadeh, Hossein
Perraton, Luke G.
Biomechanical Markers of Forward Hop-Landing After ACL-Reconstruction: A Pattern Recognition Approach
title Biomechanical Markers of Forward Hop-Landing After ACL-Reconstruction: A Pattern Recognition Approach
title_full Biomechanical Markers of Forward Hop-Landing After ACL-Reconstruction: A Pattern Recognition Approach
title_fullStr Biomechanical Markers of Forward Hop-Landing After ACL-Reconstruction: A Pattern Recognition Approach
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical Markers of Forward Hop-Landing After ACL-Reconstruction: A Pattern Recognition Approach
title_short Biomechanical Markers of Forward Hop-Landing After ACL-Reconstruction: A Pattern Recognition Approach
title_sort biomechanical markers of forward hop-landing after acl-reconstruction: a pattern recognition approach
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8847210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35099657
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10439-022-02921-4
work_keys_str_mv AT sritharanprasanna biomechanicalmarkersofforwardhoplandingafteraclreconstructionapatternrecognitionapproach
AT munozmarioa biomechanicalmarkersofforwardhoplandingafteraclreconstructionapatternrecognitionapproach
AT pivonkapeter biomechanicalmarkersofforwardhoplandingafteraclreconstructionapatternrecognitionapproach
AT bryantadaml biomechanicalmarkersofforwardhoplandingafteraclreconstructionapatternrecognitionapproach
AT mokhtarzadehhossein biomechanicalmarkersofforwardhoplandingafteraclreconstructionapatternrecognitionapproach
AT perratonlukeg biomechanicalmarkersofforwardhoplandingafteraclreconstructionapatternrecognitionapproach