Cargando…

Evolving Perceptions, Utilization, and Real-World Implementation Experiences of Oncology Monoclonal Antibody Biosimilars in the USA: Perspectives from Both Payers and Physicians

BACKGROUND: The adoption of oncology biosimilars has been slow in the USA, which may be attributed in part to stakeholder perceptions and lack of operational guidance that supports favorable access to biosimilars. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to understand the real-world implementation experiences w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Jingyan, Blinzler, Kelly, Lankin, Joshua, Vijayakumar, Sapna, Maculaitis, Martine C., Shelbaya, Ahmed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8847267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34822141
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40259-021-00509-3
_version_ 1784652015930966016
author Yang, Jingyan
Blinzler, Kelly
Lankin, Joshua
Vijayakumar, Sapna
Maculaitis, Martine C.
Shelbaya, Ahmed
author_facet Yang, Jingyan
Blinzler, Kelly
Lankin, Joshua
Vijayakumar, Sapna
Maculaitis, Martine C.
Shelbaya, Ahmed
author_sort Yang, Jingyan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The adoption of oncology biosimilars has been slow in the USA, which may be attributed in part to stakeholder perceptions and lack of operational guidance that supports favorable access to biosimilars. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to understand the real-world implementation experiences with oncology biosimilars of US payers and healthcare professionals (HCPs) as their experience with biosimilars has evolved. METHODS: In-depth qualitative interviews with payers (n = 20) and HCPs (n = 17 physicians, n = 3 practice managers) were conducted. Payers included managed care organizations (MCOs), integrated delivery networks, and pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs). Physicians were affiliated with a healthcare network or were community based, specialized in hematology/oncology, and had prescribed oncology biosimilars. Audio transcripts of the interviews were coded using MaxQDA software to enable descriptive analysis of the qualitative data. RESULTS: Over 80.0% of physicians perceived the efficacy and safety of biosimilars to be highly comparable to that of originators. Up to 87.5% of physicians reported using biosimilars in > 50% of their treatment-naïve patients and were comfortable using biosimilars in all approved indications. To encourage utilization, 75.0% of MCOs/PBMs preferred biosimilars over originators in treatment-naïve patients and implementation via step therapy. Physician involvement in choosing biosimilars was minimal, which was largely dependent on practice protocols or insurance preferences. The major factor influencing payers’ coverage decisions and biosimilar adoption was potential cost savings. CONCLUSIONS: US payers and physicians who have experience with biosimilars have favorable views of oncology biosimilars, particularly for treatment-naïve patients. A framework for integrating biosimilars into oncology practice is developing, primarily driven by insurance coverage, contracting, and cost benefits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8847267
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88472672022-02-23 Evolving Perceptions, Utilization, and Real-World Implementation Experiences of Oncology Monoclonal Antibody Biosimilars in the USA: Perspectives from Both Payers and Physicians Yang, Jingyan Blinzler, Kelly Lankin, Joshua Vijayakumar, Sapna Maculaitis, Martine C. Shelbaya, Ahmed BioDrugs Original Research Article BACKGROUND: The adoption of oncology biosimilars has been slow in the USA, which may be attributed in part to stakeholder perceptions and lack of operational guidance that supports favorable access to biosimilars. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to understand the real-world implementation experiences with oncology biosimilars of US payers and healthcare professionals (HCPs) as their experience with biosimilars has evolved. METHODS: In-depth qualitative interviews with payers (n = 20) and HCPs (n = 17 physicians, n = 3 practice managers) were conducted. Payers included managed care organizations (MCOs), integrated delivery networks, and pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs). Physicians were affiliated with a healthcare network or were community based, specialized in hematology/oncology, and had prescribed oncology biosimilars. Audio transcripts of the interviews were coded using MaxQDA software to enable descriptive analysis of the qualitative data. RESULTS: Over 80.0% of physicians perceived the efficacy and safety of biosimilars to be highly comparable to that of originators. Up to 87.5% of physicians reported using biosimilars in > 50% of their treatment-naïve patients and were comfortable using biosimilars in all approved indications. To encourage utilization, 75.0% of MCOs/PBMs preferred biosimilars over originators in treatment-naïve patients and implementation via step therapy. Physician involvement in choosing biosimilars was minimal, which was largely dependent on practice protocols or insurance preferences. The major factor influencing payers’ coverage decisions and biosimilar adoption was potential cost savings. CONCLUSIONS: US payers and physicians who have experience with biosimilars have favorable views of oncology biosimilars, particularly for treatment-naïve patients. A framework for integrating biosimilars into oncology practice is developing, primarily driven by insurance coverage, contracting, and cost benefits. Springer International Publishing 2021-11-25 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8847267/ /pubmed/34822141 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40259-021-00509-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Yang, Jingyan
Blinzler, Kelly
Lankin, Joshua
Vijayakumar, Sapna
Maculaitis, Martine C.
Shelbaya, Ahmed
Evolving Perceptions, Utilization, and Real-World Implementation Experiences of Oncology Monoclonal Antibody Biosimilars in the USA: Perspectives from Both Payers and Physicians
title Evolving Perceptions, Utilization, and Real-World Implementation Experiences of Oncology Monoclonal Antibody Biosimilars in the USA: Perspectives from Both Payers and Physicians
title_full Evolving Perceptions, Utilization, and Real-World Implementation Experiences of Oncology Monoclonal Antibody Biosimilars in the USA: Perspectives from Both Payers and Physicians
title_fullStr Evolving Perceptions, Utilization, and Real-World Implementation Experiences of Oncology Monoclonal Antibody Biosimilars in the USA: Perspectives from Both Payers and Physicians
title_full_unstemmed Evolving Perceptions, Utilization, and Real-World Implementation Experiences of Oncology Monoclonal Antibody Biosimilars in the USA: Perspectives from Both Payers and Physicians
title_short Evolving Perceptions, Utilization, and Real-World Implementation Experiences of Oncology Monoclonal Antibody Biosimilars in the USA: Perspectives from Both Payers and Physicians
title_sort evolving perceptions, utilization, and real-world implementation experiences of oncology monoclonal antibody biosimilars in the usa: perspectives from both payers and physicians
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8847267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34822141
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40259-021-00509-3
work_keys_str_mv AT yangjingyan evolvingperceptionsutilizationandrealworldimplementationexperiencesofoncologymonoclonalantibodybiosimilarsintheusaperspectivesfrombothpayersandphysicians
AT blinzlerkelly evolvingperceptionsutilizationandrealworldimplementationexperiencesofoncologymonoclonalantibodybiosimilarsintheusaperspectivesfrombothpayersandphysicians
AT lankinjoshua evolvingperceptionsutilizationandrealworldimplementationexperiencesofoncologymonoclonalantibodybiosimilarsintheusaperspectivesfrombothpayersandphysicians
AT vijayakumarsapna evolvingperceptionsutilizationandrealworldimplementationexperiencesofoncologymonoclonalantibodybiosimilarsintheusaperspectivesfrombothpayersandphysicians
AT maculaitismartinec evolvingperceptionsutilizationandrealworldimplementationexperiencesofoncologymonoclonalantibodybiosimilarsintheusaperspectivesfrombothpayersandphysicians
AT shelbayaahmed evolvingperceptionsutilizationandrealworldimplementationexperiencesofoncologymonoclonalantibodybiosimilarsintheusaperspectivesfrombothpayersandphysicians