Cargando…
Evolving Perceptions, Utilization, and Real-World Implementation Experiences of Oncology Monoclonal Antibody Biosimilars in the USA: Perspectives from Both Payers and Physicians
BACKGROUND: The adoption of oncology biosimilars has been slow in the USA, which may be attributed in part to stakeholder perceptions and lack of operational guidance that supports favorable access to biosimilars. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to understand the real-world implementation experiences w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8847267/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34822141 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40259-021-00509-3 |
_version_ | 1784652015930966016 |
---|---|
author | Yang, Jingyan Blinzler, Kelly Lankin, Joshua Vijayakumar, Sapna Maculaitis, Martine C. Shelbaya, Ahmed |
author_facet | Yang, Jingyan Blinzler, Kelly Lankin, Joshua Vijayakumar, Sapna Maculaitis, Martine C. Shelbaya, Ahmed |
author_sort | Yang, Jingyan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The adoption of oncology biosimilars has been slow in the USA, which may be attributed in part to stakeholder perceptions and lack of operational guidance that supports favorable access to biosimilars. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to understand the real-world implementation experiences with oncology biosimilars of US payers and healthcare professionals (HCPs) as their experience with biosimilars has evolved. METHODS: In-depth qualitative interviews with payers (n = 20) and HCPs (n = 17 physicians, n = 3 practice managers) were conducted. Payers included managed care organizations (MCOs), integrated delivery networks, and pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs). Physicians were affiliated with a healthcare network or were community based, specialized in hematology/oncology, and had prescribed oncology biosimilars. Audio transcripts of the interviews were coded using MaxQDA software to enable descriptive analysis of the qualitative data. RESULTS: Over 80.0% of physicians perceived the efficacy and safety of biosimilars to be highly comparable to that of originators. Up to 87.5% of physicians reported using biosimilars in > 50% of their treatment-naïve patients and were comfortable using biosimilars in all approved indications. To encourage utilization, 75.0% of MCOs/PBMs preferred biosimilars over originators in treatment-naïve patients and implementation via step therapy. Physician involvement in choosing biosimilars was minimal, which was largely dependent on practice protocols or insurance preferences. The major factor influencing payers’ coverage decisions and biosimilar adoption was potential cost savings. CONCLUSIONS: US payers and physicians who have experience with biosimilars have favorable views of oncology biosimilars, particularly for treatment-naïve patients. A framework for integrating biosimilars into oncology practice is developing, primarily driven by insurance coverage, contracting, and cost benefits. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8847267 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88472672022-02-23 Evolving Perceptions, Utilization, and Real-World Implementation Experiences of Oncology Monoclonal Antibody Biosimilars in the USA: Perspectives from Both Payers and Physicians Yang, Jingyan Blinzler, Kelly Lankin, Joshua Vijayakumar, Sapna Maculaitis, Martine C. Shelbaya, Ahmed BioDrugs Original Research Article BACKGROUND: The adoption of oncology biosimilars has been slow in the USA, which may be attributed in part to stakeholder perceptions and lack of operational guidance that supports favorable access to biosimilars. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to understand the real-world implementation experiences with oncology biosimilars of US payers and healthcare professionals (HCPs) as their experience with biosimilars has evolved. METHODS: In-depth qualitative interviews with payers (n = 20) and HCPs (n = 17 physicians, n = 3 practice managers) were conducted. Payers included managed care organizations (MCOs), integrated delivery networks, and pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs). Physicians were affiliated with a healthcare network or were community based, specialized in hematology/oncology, and had prescribed oncology biosimilars. Audio transcripts of the interviews were coded using MaxQDA software to enable descriptive analysis of the qualitative data. RESULTS: Over 80.0% of physicians perceived the efficacy and safety of biosimilars to be highly comparable to that of originators. Up to 87.5% of physicians reported using biosimilars in > 50% of their treatment-naïve patients and were comfortable using biosimilars in all approved indications. To encourage utilization, 75.0% of MCOs/PBMs preferred biosimilars over originators in treatment-naïve patients and implementation via step therapy. Physician involvement in choosing biosimilars was minimal, which was largely dependent on practice protocols or insurance preferences. The major factor influencing payers’ coverage decisions and biosimilar adoption was potential cost savings. CONCLUSIONS: US payers and physicians who have experience with biosimilars have favorable views of oncology biosimilars, particularly for treatment-naïve patients. A framework for integrating biosimilars into oncology practice is developing, primarily driven by insurance coverage, contracting, and cost benefits. Springer International Publishing 2021-11-25 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8847267/ /pubmed/34822141 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40259-021-00509-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Yang, Jingyan Blinzler, Kelly Lankin, Joshua Vijayakumar, Sapna Maculaitis, Martine C. Shelbaya, Ahmed Evolving Perceptions, Utilization, and Real-World Implementation Experiences of Oncology Monoclonal Antibody Biosimilars in the USA: Perspectives from Both Payers and Physicians |
title | Evolving Perceptions, Utilization, and Real-World Implementation Experiences of Oncology Monoclonal Antibody Biosimilars in the USA: Perspectives from Both Payers and Physicians |
title_full | Evolving Perceptions, Utilization, and Real-World Implementation Experiences of Oncology Monoclonal Antibody Biosimilars in the USA: Perspectives from Both Payers and Physicians |
title_fullStr | Evolving Perceptions, Utilization, and Real-World Implementation Experiences of Oncology Monoclonal Antibody Biosimilars in the USA: Perspectives from Both Payers and Physicians |
title_full_unstemmed | Evolving Perceptions, Utilization, and Real-World Implementation Experiences of Oncology Monoclonal Antibody Biosimilars in the USA: Perspectives from Both Payers and Physicians |
title_short | Evolving Perceptions, Utilization, and Real-World Implementation Experiences of Oncology Monoclonal Antibody Biosimilars in the USA: Perspectives from Both Payers and Physicians |
title_sort | evolving perceptions, utilization, and real-world implementation experiences of oncology monoclonal antibody biosimilars in the usa: perspectives from both payers and physicians |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8847267/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34822141 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40259-021-00509-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yangjingyan evolvingperceptionsutilizationandrealworldimplementationexperiencesofoncologymonoclonalantibodybiosimilarsintheusaperspectivesfrombothpayersandphysicians AT blinzlerkelly evolvingperceptionsutilizationandrealworldimplementationexperiencesofoncologymonoclonalantibodybiosimilarsintheusaperspectivesfrombothpayersandphysicians AT lankinjoshua evolvingperceptionsutilizationandrealworldimplementationexperiencesofoncologymonoclonalantibodybiosimilarsintheusaperspectivesfrombothpayersandphysicians AT vijayakumarsapna evolvingperceptionsutilizationandrealworldimplementationexperiencesofoncologymonoclonalantibodybiosimilarsintheusaperspectivesfrombothpayersandphysicians AT maculaitismartinec evolvingperceptionsutilizationandrealworldimplementationexperiencesofoncologymonoclonalantibodybiosimilarsintheusaperspectivesfrombothpayersandphysicians AT shelbayaahmed evolvingperceptionsutilizationandrealworldimplementationexperiencesofoncologymonoclonalantibodybiosimilarsintheusaperspectivesfrombothpayersandphysicians |