Cargando…

Practice in Nursery Weed Control—Review and Meta-Analysis

Weeds, as one of the biggest challenges in the nursery industry, have been controlled by various methods, such as chemical and non-chemical practices. Although these practices have been widely established and tested to control weeds, there is no systematic or meta-analysis review to provide quantita...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yu, Ping, Marble, Stephen Christopher
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8847678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35185957
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.807736
_version_ 1784652095664685056
author Yu, Ping
Marble, Stephen Christopher
author_facet Yu, Ping
Marble, Stephen Christopher
author_sort Yu, Ping
collection PubMed
description Weeds, as one of the biggest challenges in the nursery industry, have been controlled by various methods, such as chemical and non-chemical practices. Although these practices have been widely established and tested to control weeds, there is no systematic or meta-analysis review to provide quantitative weed control efficacy information of these practices. To provide a systematic understanding of weed control practices in nursery production, a visualization research trend, a systematic review, and a meta-analysis were conducted. A total of 267 relevant studies were included for the research trend and 83 were included in the meta-analysis. The results in this study showed that interests in nursery weed control have switched dramatically in the past 2–3 decades (1995–2021) from chemical dominant weed control to chemical coexistent with non-chemical techniques. Developing new management tactics and implementing diverse combinations of integrated weed management present the future trend for weed control. The systematic review results showed that chemical methods had the highest weed control efficacy, while non-chemical had the lowest on average, nonetheless, all three weed control practices (chemical, non-chemical, and combined) reduced the weed biomass and density significantly compared with when no strategy was employed. Weed control challenges could be the catalyst for the development of new non-chemical and integrated weed control techniques.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8847678
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88476782022-02-17 Practice in Nursery Weed Control—Review and Meta-Analysis Yu, Ping Marble, Stephen Christopher Front Plant Sci Plant Science Weeds, as one of the biggest challenges in the nursery industry, have been controlled by various methods, such as chemical and non-chemical practices. Although these practices have been widely established and tested to control weeds, there is no systematic or meta-analysis review to provide quantitative weed control efficacy information of these practices. To provide a systematic understanding of weed control practices in nursery production, a visualization research trend, a systematic review, and a meta-analysis were conducted. A total of 267 relevant studies were included for the research trend and 83 were included in the meta-analysis. The results in this study showed that interests in nursery weed control have switched dramatically in the past 2–3 decades (1995–2021) from chemical dominant weed control to chemical coexistent with non-chemical techniques. Developing new management tactics and implementing diverse combinations of integrated weed management present the future trend for weed control. The systematic review results showed that chemical methods had the highest weed control efficacy, while non-chemical had the lowest on average, nonetheless, all three weed control practices (chemical, non-chemical, and combined) reduced the weed biomass and density significantly compared with when no strategy was employed. Weed control challenges could be the catalyst for the development of new non-chemical and integrated weed control techniques. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8847678/ /pubmed/35185957 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.807736 Text en Copyright © 2022 Yu and Marble. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
Yu, Ping
Marble, Stephen Christopher
Practice in Nursery Weed Control—Review and Meta-Analysis
title Practice in Nursery Weed Control—Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Practice in Nursery Weed Control—Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Practice in Nursery Weed Control—Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Practice in Nursery Weed Control—Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Practice in Nursery Weed Control—Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort practice in nursery weed control—review and meta-analysis
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8847678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35185957
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.807736
work_keys_str_mv AT yuping practiceinnurseryweedcontrolreviewandmetaanalysis
AT marblestephenchristopher practiceinnurseryweedcontrolreviewandmetaanalysis