Cargando…

Missed Opportunities? An Observational Analysis of Lung Cancer Screening Utilization Amongst Patients With Lung Cancer

Lung cancer (LC) is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommend annual low-dose CT chest (LDCT) for LC screening in high-risk adults who meet appropriate criteria, which primarily fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Olazagasti, Coral, Ehrlich, Matthew, Kohn, Nina, Aviles, Karen, Hoilett, Aldane, Seetharamu, Nagashree
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8848039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35157547
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10732748221077959
_version_ 1784652168468365312
author Olazagasti, Coral
Ehrlich, Matthew
Kohn, Nina
Aviles, Karen
Hoilett, Aldane
Seetharamu, Nagashree
author_facet Olazagasti, Coral
Ehrlich, Matthew
Kohn, Nina
Aviles, Karen
Hoilett, Aldane
Seetharamu, Nagashree
author_sort Olazagasti, Coral
collection PubMed
description Lung cancer (LC) is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommend annual low-dose CT chest (LDCT) for LC screening in high-risk adults who meet appropriate criteria, which primarily focus on age and smoking history. Despite this, screening rates remain low and patients with LC are typically diagnosed at a later stage. We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of patients with an established diagnosis of lung cancer to evaluate if screening guidelines were appropriately followed before the cancer diagnosis. Patients diagnosed with LC between 2016 and 2019 were included in the analysis. Charts were reviewed for demographics, detailed smoking history, as well as histology and stage of LC. Associations between categorical factors and screening were examined using the chi-square test. Associations between continuous and ordinal factors and screening were examined using the Mann–Whitney test. A total of 530 charts were reviewed, of which 52% met NCCN criteria and 35% met USPSTF criteria. Only 4.0% and 4.8% of patients who met NCCN and USPSTF criteria, respectively, underwent screening. There was a significant association between staging at diagnosis and screening with LDCT. All the patients who had screening CT scans were diagnosed at localized stages of lung cancer in both NCCN and USPSTF groups compared to 49.1% and 48% in eligible subjects that did not undergo screening, respectively. Our study showed that despite established guidelines for LC screening and insurance coverage, a vast majority of screening-eligible LC patients have never had LDCT. We found that patients who underwent screening as per guidelines were diagnosed at earlier stages of the disease. Ongoing efforts to increase awareness and adherence to LC screening guidelines are needed to improve early detection and reduce LC mortality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8848039
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88480392022-02-17 Missed Opportunities? An Observational Analysis of Lung Cancer Screening Utilization Amongst Patients With Lung Cancer Olazagasti, Coral Ehrlich, Matthew Kohn, Nina Aviles, Karen Hoilett, Aldane Seetharamu, Nagashree Cancer Control Original Research Article Lung cancer (LC) is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommend annual low-dose CT chest (LDCT) for LC screening in high-risk adults who meet appropriate criteria, which primarily focus on age and smoking history. Despite this, screening rates remain low and patients with LC are typically diagnosed at a later stage. We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of patients with an established diagnosis of lung cancer to evaluate if screening guidelines were appropriately followed before the cancer diagnosis. Patients diagnosed with LC between 2016 and 2019 were included in the analysis. Charts were reviewed for demographics, detailed smoking history, as well as histology and stage of LC. Associations between categorical factors and screening were examined using the chi-square test. Associations between continuous and ordinal factors and screening were examined using the Mann–Whitney test. A total of 530 charts were reviewed, of which 52% met NCCN criteria and 35% met USPSTF criteria. Only 4.0% and 4.8% of patients who met NCCN and USPSTF criteria, respectively, underwent screening. There was a significant association between staging at diagnosis and screening with LDCT. All the patients who had screening CT scans were diagnosed at localized stages of lung cancer in both NCCN and USPSTF groups compared to 49.1% and 48% in eligible subjects that did not undergo screening, respectively. Our study showed that despite established guidelines for LC screening and insurance coverage, a vast majority of screening-eligible LC patients have never had LDCT. We found that patients who underwent screening as per guidelines were diagnosed at earlier stages of the disease. Ongoing efforts to increase awareness and adherence to LC screening guidelines are needed to improve early detection and reduce LC mortality. SAGE Publications 2022-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8848039/ /pubmed/35157547 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10732748221077959 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Olazagasti, Coral
Ehrlich, Matthew
Kohn, Nina
Aviles, Karen
Hoilett, Aldane
Seetharamu, Nagashree
Missed Opportunities? An Observational Analysis of Lung Cancer Screening Utilization Amongst Patients With Lung Cancer
title Missed Opportunities? An Observational Analysis of Lung Cancer Screening Utilization Amongst Patients With Lung Cancer
title_full Missed Opportunities? An Observational Analysis of Lung Cancer Screening Utilization Amongst Patients With Lung Cancer
title_fullStr Missed Opportunities? An Observational Analysis of Lung Cancer Screening Utilization Amongst Patients With Lung Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Missed Opportunities? An Observational Analysis of Lung Cancer Screening Utilization Amongst Patients With Lung Cancer
title_short Missed Opportunities? An Observational Analysis of Lung Cancer Screening Utilization Amongst Patients With Lung Cancer
title_sort missed opportunities? an observational analysis of lung cancer screening utilization amongst patients with lung cancer
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8848039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35157547
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10732748221077959
work_keys_str_mv AT olazagasticoral missedopportunitiesanobservationalanalysisoflungcancerscreeningutilizationamongstpatientswithlungcancer
AT ehrlichmatthew missedopportunitiesanobservationalanalysisoflungcancerscreeningutilizationamongstpatientswithlungcancer
AT kohnnina missedopportunitiesanobservationalanalysisoflungcancerscreeningutilizationamongstpatientswithlungcancer
AT avileskaren missedopportunitiesanobservationalanalysisoflungcancerscreeningutilizationamongstpatientswithlungcancer
AT hoilettaldane missedopportunitiesanobservationalanalysisoflungcancerscreeningutilizationamongstpatientswithlungcancer
AT seetharamunagashree missedopportunitiesanobservationalanalysisoflungcancerscreeningutilizationamongstpatientswithlungcancer