Cargando…

Marking Pen Bacterial Contamination During Shoulder Surgery

BACKGROUND: Equipment used to guide surgical incisions has been shown to be a source of bacterial contamination during surgery. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: To compare the culture-positive rates of sterile marking pens used before and after skin preparation for shoulder surgery. It was hypothesized that ther...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Magone, Kevin, Ristow, Jacob, Root, Kyle, Atkinson, Theresa, Sardelli, Matthew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8848060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35187182
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671211062225
_version_ 1784652173697613824
author Magone, Kevin
Ristow, Jacob
Root, Kyle
Atkinson, Theresa
Sardelli, Matthew
author_facet Magone, Kevin
Ristow, Jacob
Root, Kyle
Atkinson, Theresa
Sardelli, Matthew
author_sort Magone, Kevin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Equipment used to guide surgical incisions has been shown to be a source of bacterial contamination during surgery. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: To compare the culture-positive rates of sterile marking pens used before and after skin preparation for shoulder surgery. It was hypothesized that there will be no difference in culture-positive rates from marking pens used after skin preparation compared with before skin preparation. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Overall, 43 consecutive patients undergoing elective shoulder surgery were enrolled prospectively into this study. Each patient provided 2 samples: study pens (from marking the surgical site incision after skin preparation) and positive control pens (from marking the surgical site incision before skin preparation). In addition, there were 43 negative control pens evaluated (straight from the packaging without any patient contact). Cultures were evaluated at 4 and 21 days, and all positive cultures were further evaluated for speciation, if able. Standard descriptive summaries and Fisher exact tests were used to compare the study samples. RESULTS: The average age of the 43 patients was 54 years (range, 18-76 years). There were 29 (67%) female patients, and 30 (70%) procedures were on the right shoulder. Of the 43 procedures performed, 29 (67.4%) were arthroscopic, 12 (27.9%) were open, and 2 (4.7%) were closed. Of the 43 study pens, 1 culture was positive for Propionibacterium acnes (2.3%). Of the 43 positive control pens, 2 cultures were positive for bacterial growth (4.7%): P. acnes and Gram-positive bacilli (no speciation could be obtained). Of the 43 negative control pens, none of the cultures were positive for bacterial growth (0%). There was no statistical difference in the culture-positive rate between the study pens and the positive or negative control pens (P ≥ .999). CONCLUSION: Study results indicated that sterile surgical marking pens used to plan incisions and to outline anatomic landmarks did not have a higher culture-positive rate compared with pens used on unprepared skin or pens straight from the packaging. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: As a precaution, sterile surgical marking pens should be discarded after use on the skin surface and not placed on the sterile field.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8848060
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88480602022-02-17 Marking Pen Bacterial Contamination During Shoulder Surgery Magone, Kevin Ristow, Jacob Root, Kyle Atkinson, Theresa Sardelli, Matthew Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: Equipment used to guide surgical incisions has been shown to be a source of bacterial contamination during surgery. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: To compare the culture-positive rates of sterile marking pens used before and after skin preparation for shoulder surgery. It was hypothesized that there will be no difference in culture-positive rates from marking pens used after skin preparation compared with before skin preparation. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Overall, 43 consecutive patients undergoing elective shoulder surgery were enrolled prospectively into this study. Each patient provided 2 samples: study pens (from marking the surgical site incision after skin preparation) and positive control pens (from marking the surgical site incision before skin preparation). In addition, there were 43 negative control pens evaluated (straight from the packaging without any patient contact). Cultures were evaluated at 4 and 21 days, and all positive cultures were further evaluated for speciation, if able. Standard descriptive summaries and Fisher exact tests were used to compare the study samples. RESULTS: The average age of the 43 patients was 54 years (range, 18-76 years). There were 29 (67%) female patients, and 30 (70%) procedures were on the right shoulder. Of the 43 procedures performed, 29 (67.4%) were arthroscopic, 12 (27.9%) were open, and 2 (4.7%) were closed. Of the 43 study pens, 1 culture was positive for Propionibacterium acnes (2.3%). Of the 43 positive control pens, 2 cultures were positive for bacterial growth (4.7%): P. acnes and Gram-positive bacilli (no speciation could be obtained). Of the 43 negative control pens, none of the cultures were positive for bacterial growth (0%). There was no statistical difference in the culture-positive rate between the study pens and the positive or negative control pens (P ≥ .999). CONCLUSION: Study results indicated that sterile surgical marking pens used to plan incisions and to outline anatomic landmarks did not have a higher culture-positive rate compared with pens used on unprepared skin or pens straight from the packaging. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: As a precaution, sterile surgical marking pens should be discarded after use on the skin surface and not placed on the sterile field. SAGE Publications 2022-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8848060/ /pubmed/35187182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671211062225 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Magone, Kevin
Ristow, Jacob
Root, Kyle
Atkinson, Theresa
Sardelli, Matthew
Marking Pen Bacterial Contamination During Shoulder Surgery
title Marking Pen Bacterial Contamination During Shoulder Surgery
title_full Marking Pen Bacterial Contamination During Shoulder Surgery
title_fullStr Marking Pen Bacterial Contamination During Shoulder Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Marking Pen Bacterial Contamination During Shoulder Surgery
title_short Marking Pen Bacterial Contamination During Shoulder Surgery
title_sort marking pen bacterial contamination during shoulder surgery
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8848060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35187182
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671211062225
work_keys_str_mv AT magonekevin markingpenbacterialcontaminationduringshouldersurgery
AT ristowjacob markingpenbacterialcontaminationduringshouldersurgery
AT rootkyle markingpenbacterialcontaminationduringshouldersurgery
AT atkinsontheresa markingpenbacterialcontaminationduringshouldersurgery
AT sardellimatthew markingpenbacterialcontaminationduringshouldersurgery