Cargando…
Discussion on the rationality of FIGO 2018 stage IIIC for cervical cancer with oncological outcomes: a cohort study
BACKGROUND: This study explored the rationality of the 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIIC for cervical cancer to determine outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of cervical cancer patients who had received radical surgery or Radiotherapy. Mul...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8848354/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35282078 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-6374 |
_version_ | 1784652230572376064 |
---|---|
author | Li, Zhiqiang Duan, Hui Guo, Jianxin Yang, Ying Wang, Wuliang Hao, Min Li, Weili Li, Pengfei Bin, Xiaonong Lang, Jinghe Liu, Ping Chen, Chunlin |
author_facet | Li, Zhiqiang Duan, Hui Guo, Jianxin Yang, Ying Wang, Wuliang Hao, Min Li, Weili Li, Pengfei Bin, Xiaonong Lang, Jinghe Liu, Ping Chen, Chunlin |
author_sort | Li, Zhiqiang |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study explored the rationality of the 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIIC for cervical cancer to determine outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of cervical cancer patients who had received radical surgery or Radiotherapy. Multivariate analysis was used to compare 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) for FIGO 2018 stages IIIA, IIIB, and IIIC cervical cancer patients. Based on tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging, IIIC cases were divided into 5 subgroups: T1a, T1b, T2a, T2b, and T3. The 5-year OS and DFS of the different IIIC subgroups were further compared using multivariate analysis. RESULTS: (I) The 5-year OS for FIGO 2018 IIIA (n=251), IIIB (n=1,824), and IIIC (n=3,137) were 73.7%, 69.0%, and 74.3%, respectively (P<0.001), and DFS rates were 64.3%, 60.6%, and 68.0%, respectively (P<0.001). Multivariate analysis indicated that IIIA was associated with 5-year OS [hazard ratio (HR) =0.998, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.739–1.349, P=0.990], but there was no significant correlation with DFS (HR =1.081, 95% CI: 0.843–1.387, P=0.539). Compared with IIIC, IIIB had a lower 5-year OS (HR =1.291, 95% CI: 1.135–1.468, P<0.001) and DFS (HR =1.354, 95% CI: 1.215–1.508, P<0.001). (II) The 5-year OS of the T1a group (n=4), T1b group (n=861), T2a group (n=587), T2b (n=641) group, and T3 group (n=1,044) were 100.0%, 81.9%, 76.1%, 74.0%, and 65.0%, respectively (P<0.001), and the 5-year DFS were 100.0%, 74.5%, 65.9%, 72.6%, and 61.3%, respectively (P<0.001). Multivariate analysis indicated that compared with the T1b group, T2a (HR =1.405, 95% CI: 1.076–1.834, P=0.012), T2b (HR =1.592, 95% CI: 1.203–2.108, P=0.001), and T3 (HR =2.495, 95% CI: 1.971–3.157, P<0.001) were associated with a lower 5-year OS. T2a (HR =1.372, 95% CI: 1.108–1.699, P=0.004), T2b (HR =1.337, 95% CI: 1.061–1.684, P=0.014), and T3 (HR =2.015, 95% CI: 1.659–2.446, P<0.001) were associated with lower 5-year DFS. CONCLUSIONS: The outcome for FIGO 2018 stage IIIC cervical cancer is not worse than that for stage IIIB or IIIA. The outcome for stage IIIC is related to local tumor factors. As the local tumor progresses, the oncological outcome worsens. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8848354 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88483542022-03-10 Discussion on the rationality of FIGO 2018 stage IIIC for cervical cancer with oncological outcomes: a cohort study Li, Zhiqiang Duan, Hui Guo, Jianxin Yang, Ying Wang, Wuliang Hao, Min Li, Weili Li, Pengfei Bin, Xiaonong Lang, Jinghe Liu, Ping Chen, Chunlin Ann Transl Med Original Article on New Progress and Challenge in Gynecological Cancer BACKGROUND: This study explored the rationality of the 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIIC for cervical cancer to determine outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of cervical cancer patients who had received radical surgery or Radiotherapy. Multivariate analysis was used to compare 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) for FIGO 2018 stages IIIA, IIIB, and IIIC cervical cancer patients. Based on tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging, IIIC cases were divided into 5 subgroups: T1a, T1b, T2a, T2b, and T3. The 5-year OS and DFS of the different IIIC subgroups were further compared using multivariate analysis. RESULTS: (I) The 5-year OS for FIGO 2018 IIIA (n=251), IIIB (n=1,824), and IIIC (n=3,137) were 73.7%, 69.0%, and 74.3%, respectively (P<0.001), and DFS rates were 64.3%, 60.6%, and 68.0%, respectively (P<0.001). Multivariate analysis indicated that IIIA was associated with 5-year OS [hazard ratio (HR) =0.998, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.739–1.349, P=0.990], but there was no significant correlation with DFS (HR =1.081, 95% CI: 0.843–1.387, P=0.539). Compared with IIIC, IIIB had a lower 5-year OS (HR =1.291, 95% CI: 1.135–1.468, P<0.001) and DFS (HR =1.354, 95% CI: 1.215–1.508, P<0.001). (II) The 5-year OS of the T1a group (n=4), T1b group (n=861), T2a group (n=587), T2b (n=641) group, and T3 group (n=1,044) were 100.0%, 81.9%, 76.1%, 74.0%, and 65.0%, respectively (P<0.001), and the 5-year DFS were 100.0%, 74.5%, 65.9%, 72.6%, and 61.3%, respectively (P<0.001). Multivariate analysis indicated that compared with the T1b group, T2a (HR =1.405, 95% CI: 1.076–1.834, P=0.012), T2b (HR =1.592, 95% CI: 1.203–2.108, P=0.001), and T3 (HR =2.495, 95% CI: 1.971–3.157, P<0.001) were associated with a lower 5-year OS. T2a (HR =1.372, 95% CI: 1.108–1.699, P=0.004), T2b (HR =1.337, 95% CI: 1.061–1.684, P=0.014), and T3 (HR =2.015, 95% CI: 1.659–2.446, P<0.001) were associated with lower 5-year DFS. CONCLUSIONS: The outcome for FIGO 2018 stage IIIC cervical cancer is not worse than that for stage IIIB or IIIA. The outcome for stage IIIC is related to local tumor factors. As the local tumor progresses, the oncological outcome worsens. AME Publishing Company 2022-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8848354/ /pubmed/35282078 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-6374 Text en 2022 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article on New Progress and Challenge in Gynecological Cancer Li, Zhiqiang Duan, Hui Guo, Jianxin Yang, Ying Wang, Wuliang Hao, Min Li, Weili Li, Pengfei Bin, Xiaonong Lang, Jinghe Liu, Ping Chen, Chunlin Discussion on the rationality of FIGO 2018 stage IIIC for cervical cancer with oncological outcomes: a cohort study |
title | Discussion on the rationality of FIGO 2018 stage IIIC for cervical cancer with oncological outcomes: a cohort study |
title_full | Discussion on the rationality of FIGO 2018 stage IIIC for cervical cancer with oncological outcomes: a cohort study |
title_fullStr | Discussion on the rationality of FIGO 2018 stage IIIC for cervical cancer with oncological outcomes: a cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Discussion on the rationality of FIGO 2018 stage IIIC for cervical cancer with oncological outcomes: a cohort study |
title_short | Discussion on the rationality of FIGO 2018 stage IIIC for cervical cancer with oncological outcomes: a cohort study |
title_sort | discussion on the rationality of figo 2018 stage iiic for cervical cancer with oncological outcomes: a cohort study |
topic | Original Article on New Progress and Challenge in Gynecological Cancer |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8848354/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35282078 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-6374 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lizhiqiang discussionontherationalityoffigo2018stageiiicforcervicalcancerwithoncologicaloutcomesacohortstudy AT duanhui discussionontherationalityoffigo2018stageiiicforcervicalcancerwithoncologicaloutcomesacohortstudy AT guojianxin discussionontherationalityoffigo2018stageiiicforcervicalcancerwithoncologicaloutcomesacohortstudy AT yangying discussionontherationalityoffigo2018stageiiicforcervicalcancerwithoncologicaloutcomesacohortstudy AT wangwuliang discussionontherationalityoffigo2018stageiiicforcervicalcancerwithoncologicaloutcomesacohortstudy AT haomin discussionontherationalityoffigo2018stageiiicforcervicalcancerwithoncologicaloutcomesacohortstudy AT liweili discussionontherationalityoffigo2018stageiiicforcervicalcancerwithoncologicaloutcomesacohortstudy AT lipengfei discussionontherationalityoffigo2018stageiiicforcervicalcancerwithoncologicaloutcomesacohortstudy AT binxiaonong discussionontherationalityoffigo2018stageiiicforcervicalcancerwithoncologicaloutcomesacohortstudy AT langjinghe discussionontherationalityoffigo2018stageiiicforcervicalcancerwithoncologicaloutcomesacohortstudy AT liuping discussionontherationalityoffigo2018stageiiicforcervicalcancerwithoncologicaloutcomesacohortstudy AT chenchunlin discussionontherationalityoffigo2018stageiiicforcervicalcancerwithoncologicaloutcomesacohortstudy |