Cargando…

Discussion on the rationality of FIGO 2018 stage IIIC for cervical cancer with oncological outcomes: a cohort study

BACKGROUND: This study explored the rationality of the 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIIC for cervical cancer to determine outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of cervical cancer patients who had received radical surgery or Radiotherapy. Mul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Zhiqiang, Duan, Hui, Guo, Jianxin, Yang, Ying, Wang, Wuliang, Hao, Min, Li, Weili, Li, Pengfei, Bin, Xiaonong, Lang, Jinghe, Liu, Ping, Chen, Chunlin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8848354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35282078
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-6374
_version_ 1784652230572376064
author Li, Zhiqiang
Duan, Hui
Guo, Jianxin
Yang, Ying
Wang, Wuliang
Hao, Min
Li, Weili
Li, Pengfei
Bin, Xiaonong
Lang, Jinghe
Liu, Ping
Chen, Chunlin
author_facet Li, Zhiqiang
Duan, Hui
Guo, Jianxin
Yang, Ying
Wang, Wuliang
Hao, Min
Li, Weili
Li, Pengfei
Bin, Xiaonong
Lang, Jinghe
Liu, Ping
Chen, Chunlin
author_sort Li, Zhiqiang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study explored the rationality of the 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIIC for cervical cancer to determine outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of cervical cancer patients who had received radical surgery or Radiotherapy. Multivariate analysis was used to compare 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) for FIGO 2018 stages IIIA, IIIB, and IIIC cervical cancer patients. Based on tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging, IIIC cases were divided into 5 subgroups: T1a, T1b, T2a, T2b, and T3. The 5-year OS and DFS of the different IIIC subgroups were further compared using multivariate analysis. RESULTS: (I) The 5-year OS for FIGO 2018 IIIA (n=251), IIIB (n=1,824), and IIIC (n=3,137) were 73.7%, 69.0%, and 74.3%, respectively (P<0.001), and DFS rates were 64.3%, 60.6%, and 68.0%, respectively (P<0.001). Multivariate analysis indicated that IIIA was associated with 5-year OS [hazard ratio (HR) =0.998, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.739–1.349, P=0.990], but there was no significant correlation with DFS (HR =1.081, 95% CI: 0.843–1.387, P=0.539). Compared with IIIC, IIIB had a lower 5-year OS (HR =1.291, 95% CI: 1.135–1.468, P<0.001) and DFS (HR =1.354, 95% CI: 1.215–1.508, P<0.001). (II) The 5-year OS of the T1a group (n=4), T1b group (n=861), T2a group (n=587), T2b (n=641) group, and T3 group (n=1,044) were 100.0%, 81.9%, 76.1%, 74.0%, and 65.0%, respectively (P<0.001), and the 5-year DFS were 100.0%, 74.5%, 65.9%, 72.6%, and 61.3%, respectively (P<0.001). Multivariate analysis indicated that compared with the T1b group, T2a (HR =1.405, 95% CI: 1.076–1.834, P=0.012), T2b (HR =1.592, 95% CI: 1.203–2.108, P=0.001), and T3 (HR =2.495, 95% CI: 1.971–3.157, P<0.001) were associated with a lower 5-year OS. T2a (HR =1.372, 95% CI: 1.108–1.699, P=0.004), T2b (HR =1.337, 95% CI: 1.061–1.684, P=0.014), and T3 (HR =2.015, 95% CI: 1.659–2.446, P<0.001) were associated with lower 5-year DFS. CONCLUSIONS: The outcome for FIGO 2018 stage IIIC cervical cancer is not worse than that for stage IIIB or IIIA. The outcome for stage IIIC is related to local tumor factors. As the local tumor progresses, the oncological outcome worsens.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8848354
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88483542022-03-10 Discussion on the rationality of FIGO 2018 stage IIIC for cervical cancer with oncological outcomes: a cohort study Li, Zhiqiang Duan, Hui Guo, Jianxin Yang, Ying Wang, Wuliang Hao, Min Li, Weili Li, Pengfei Bin, Xiaonong Lang, Jinghe Liu, Ping Chen, Chunlin Ann Transl Med Original Article on New Progress and Challenge in Gynecological Cancer BACKGROUND: This study explored the rationality of the 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIIC for cervical cancer to determine outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of cervical cancer patients who had received radical surgery or Radiotherapy. Multivariate analysis was used to compare 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) for FIGO 2018 stages IIIA, IIIB, and IIIC cervical cancer patients. Based on tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging, IIIC cases were divided into 5 subgroups: T1a, T1b, T2a, T2b, and T3. The 5-year OS and DFS of the different IIIC subgroups were further compared using multivariate analysis. RESULTS: (I) The 5-year OS for FIGO 2018 IIIA (n=251), IIIB (n=1,824), and IIIC (n=3,137) were 73.7%, 69.0%, and 74.3%, respectively (P<0.001), and DFS rates were 64.3%, 60.6%, and 68.0%, respectively (P<0.001). Multivariate analysis indicated that IIIA was associated with 5-year OS [hazard ratio (HR) =0.998, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.739–1.349, P=0.990], but there was no significant correlation with DFS (HR =1.081, 95% CI: 0.843–1.387, P=0.539). Compared with IIIC, IIIB had a lower 5-year OS (HR =1.291, 95% CI: 1.135–1.468, P<0.001) and DFS (HR =1.354, 95% CI: 1.215–1.508, P<0.001). (II) The 5-year OS of the T1a group (n=4), T1b group (n=861), T2a group (n=587), T2b (n=641) group, and T3 group (n=1,044) were 100.0%, 81.9%, 76.1%, 74.0%, and 65.0%, respectively (P<0.001), and the 5-year DFS were 100.0%, 74.5%, 65.9%, 72.6%, and 61.3%, respectively (P<0.001). Multivariate analysis indicated that compared with the T1b group, T2a (HR =1.405, 95% CI: 1.076–1.834, P=0.012), T2b (HR =1.592, 95% CI: 1.203–2.108, P=0.001), and T3 (HR =2.495, 95% CI: 1.971–3.157, P<0.001) were associated with a lower 5-year OS. T2a (HR =1.372, 95% CI: 1.108–1.699, P=0.004), T2b (HR =1.337, 95% CI: 1.061–1.684, P=0.014), and T3 (HR =2.015, 95% CI: 1.659–2.446, P<0.001) were associated with lower 5-year DFS. CONCLUSIONS: The outcome for FIGO 2018 stage IIIC cervical cancer is not worse than that for stage IIIB or IIIA. The outcome for stage IIIC is related to local tumor factors. As the local tumor progresses, the oncological outcome worsens. AME Publishing Company 2022-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8848354/ /pubmed/35282078 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-6374 Text en 2022 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article on New Progress and Challenge in Gynecological Cancer
Li, Zhiqiang
Duan, Hui
Guo, Jianxin
Yang, Ying
Wang, Wuliang
Hao, Min
Li, Weili
Li, Pengfei
Bin, Xiaonong
Lang, Jinghe
Liu, Ping
Chen, Chunlin
Discussion on the rationality of FIGO 2018 stage IIIC for cervical cancer with oncological outcomes: a cohort study
title Discussion on the rationality of FIGO 2018 stage IIIC for cervical cancer with oncological outcomes: a cohort study
title_full Discussion on the rationality of FIGO 2018 stage IIIC for cervical cancer with oncological outcomes: a cohort study
title_fullStr Discussion on the rationality of FIGO 2018 stage IIIC for cervical cancer with oncological outcomes: a cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Discussion on the rationality of FIGO 2018 stage IIIC for cervical cancer with oncological outcomes: a cohort study
title_short Discussion on the rationality of FIGO 2018 stage IIIC for cervical cancer with oncological outcomes: a cohort study
title_sort discussion on the rationality of figo 2018 stage iiic for cervical cancer with oncological outcomes: a cohort study
topic Original Article on New Progress and Challenge in Gynecological Cancer
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8848354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35282078
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-6374
work_keys_str_mv AT lizhiqiang discussionontherationalityoffigo2018stageiiicforcervicalcancerwithoncologicaloutcomesacohortstudy
AT duanhui discussionontherationalityoffigo2018stageiiicforcervicalcancerwithoncologicaloutcomesacohortstudy
AT guojianxin discussionontherationalityoffigo2018stageiiicforcervicalcancerwithoncologicaloutcomesacohortstudy
AT yangying discussionontherationalityoffigo2018stageiiicforcervicalcancerwithoncologicaloutcomesacohortstudy
AT wangwuliang discussionontherationalityoffigo2018stageiiicforcervicalcancerwithoncologicaloutcomesacohortstudy
AT haomin discussionontherationalityoffigo2018stageiiicforcervicalcancerwithoncologicaloutcomesacohortstudy
AT liweili discussionontherationalityoffigo2018stageiiicforcervicalcancerwithoncologicaloutcomesacohortstudy
AT lipengfei discussionontherationalityoffigo2018stageiiicforcervicalcancerwithoncologicaloutcomesacohortstudy
AT binxiaonong discussionontherationalityoffigo2018stageiiicforcervicalcancerwithoncologicaloutcomesacohortstudy
AT langjinghe discussionontherationalityoffigo2018stageiiicforcervicalcancerwithoncologicaloutcomesacohortstudy
AT liuping discussionontherationalityoffigo2018stageiiicforcervicalcancerwithoncologicaloutcomesacohortstudy
AT chenchunlin discussionontherationalityoffigo2018stageiiicforcervicalcancerwithoncologicaloutcomesacohortstudy