Cargando…

Propensity-matched comparison of balloon-expandable and self-expanding valves for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in a Chinese population

BACKGROUND: Balloon-expandable valves (BEV) and self-expanding valves (SEV) for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) have shown promising results in Western populations. Herein, we comparatively evaluated their hemodynamics and early clinical outcomes in a Chinese population. METHODS: One h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ou-Yang, Wen-Bin, Wang, Wei, Dong, Jie, Xie, Yong-Quan, Wan, Jun-Yi, Yue, Zi-Qi, Wang, Shou-Zheng, Meng, Hong, Wang, Xu, Xu, Dong-Hui, Zhang, Feng-Wen, Dong, Jing, Pan, Xiang-Bin, Zhang, Ge-Jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8848425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35282054
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-6637
_version_ 1784652247740710912
author Ou-Yang, Wen-Bin
Wang, Wei
Dong, Jie
Xie, Yong-Quan
Wan, Jun-Yi
Yue, Zi-Qi
Wang, Shou-Zheng
Meng, Hong
Wang, Xu
Xu, Dong-Hui
Zhang, Feng-Wen
Dong, Jing
Pan, Xiang-Bin
Zhang, Ge-Jun
author_facet Ou-Yang, Wen-Bin
Wang, Wei
Dong, Jie
Xie, Yong-Quan
Wan, Jun-Yi
Yue, Zi-Qi
Wang, Shou-Zheng
Meng, Hong
Wang, Xu
Xu, Dong-Hui
Zhang, Feng-Wen
Dong, Jing
Pan, Xiang-Bin
Zhang, Ge-Jun
author_sort Ou-Yang, Wen-Bin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Balloon-expandable valves (BEV) and self-expanding valves (SEV) for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) have shown promising results in Western populations. Herein, we comparatively evaluated their hemodynamics and early clinical outcomes in a Chinese population. METHODS: One hundred seventy-eight patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis who had undergone transfemoral TAVR using SEV (n=153; Venus-A, 97; VitaFlow, 56) or BEV (n=25; Sapien3) from September 2020 to April 2021 were retrospectively enrolled, and 25 pairs were propensity-score matched for 10 baseline variables. The primary study outcomes were aortic valve hemodynamics and postoperative complications at discharge and 3-month follow-up. RESULTS: TAVR was successful in all patients. Compared with SEV group, the BEV group had similarly distributed baseline characteristics, procedural time, hospital stay, new pacemaker implantation, and paravalvular regurgitation grade. We also observed that the BEV group had lower rates of balloon pre-dilation (60% vs. 92%, P=0.018), post-dilation (0 vs. 20%, P=0.050) and second valve implantation (0 vs. 24%, P=0.022); higher mean transaortic gradient (14.3±6.1 vs. 10.8±4.9, P=0.030) and proportion of patients with elevated gradients (20% vs. 0, P=0.050) at discharge; and similar rehospitalization, mean transaortic gradient, new pacemaker implantation, and paravalvular regurgitation grade than the SEV group at the 3-month follow-up. There were no deaths in either group. However, the proportion of patients with elevated gradients in SEV group was higher at 3 months than before discharge (24% vs. 0, P=0.022). CONCLUSIONS: BEV and SEV for transfemoral TAVR appear comparably safe and effective, with high device success and favorable 3-month clinical outcomes. However, the transaortic gradient and new pacemaker implantation in the SEV group increased during follow-up, warranting larger studies with longer-term follow-up.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8848425
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88484252022-03-10 Propensity-matched comparison of balloon-expandable and self-expanding valves for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in a Chinese population Ou-Yang, Wen-Bin Wang, Wei Dong, Jie Xie, Yong-Quan Wan, Jun-Yi Yue, Zi-Qi Wang, Shou-Zheng Meng, Hong Wang, Xu Xu, Dong-Hui Zhang, Feng-Wen Dong, Jing Pan, Xiang-Bin Zhang, Ge-Jun Ann Transl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Balloon-expandable valves (BEV) and self-expanding valves (SEV) for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) have shown promising results in Western populations. Herein, we comparatively evaluated their hemodynamics and early clinical outcomes in a Chinese population. METHODS: One hundred seventy-eight patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis who had undergone transfemoral TAVR using SEV (n=153; Venus-A, 97; VitaFlow, 56) or BEV (n=25; Sapien3) from September 2020 to April 2021 were retrospectively enrolled, and 25 pairs were propensity-score matched for 10 baseline variables. The primary study outcomes were aortic valve hemodynamics and postoperative complications at discharge and 3-month follow-up. RESULTS: TAVR was successful in all patients. Compared with SEV group, the BEV group had similarly distributed baseline characteristics, procedural time, hospital stay, new pacemaker implantation, and paravalvular regurgitation grade. We also observed that the BEV group had lower rates of balloon pre-dilation (60% vs. 92%, P=0.018), post-dilation (0 vs. 20%, P=0.050) and second valve implantation (0 vs. 24%, P=0.022); higher mean transaortic gradient (14.3±6.1 vs. 10.8±4.9, P=0.030) and proportion of patients with elevated gradients (20% vs. 0, P=0.050) at discharge; and similar rehospitalization, mean transaortic gradient, new pacemaker implantation, and paravalvular regurgitation grade than the SEV group at the 3-month follow-up. There were no deaths in either group. However, the proportion of patients with elevated gradients in SEV group was higher at 3 months than before discharge (24% vs. 0, P=0.022). CONCLUSIONS: BEV and SEV for transfemoral TAVR appear comparably safe and effective, with high device success and favorable 3-month clinical outcomes. However, the transaortic gradient and new pacemaker implantation in the SEV group increased during follow-up, warranting larger studies with longer-term follow-up. AME Publishing Company 2022-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8848425/ /pubmed/35282054 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-6637 Text en 2022 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Ou-Yang, Wen-Bin
Wang, Wei
Dong, Jie
Xie, Yong-Quan
Wan, Jun-Yi
Yue, Zi-Qi
Wang, Shou-Zheng
Meng, Hong
Wang, Xu
Xu, Dong-Hui
Zhang, Feng-Wen
Dong, Jing
Pan, Xiang-Bin
Zhang, Ge-Jun
Propensity-matched comparison of balloon-expandable and self-expanding valves for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in a Chinese population
title Propensity-matched comparison of balloon-expandable and self-expanding valves for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in a Chinese population
title_full Propensity-matched comparison of balloon-expandable and self-expanding valves for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in a Chinese population
title_fullStr Propensity-matched comparison of balloon-expandable and self-expanding valves for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in a Chinese population
title_full_unstemmed Propensity-matched comparison of balloon-expandable and self-expanding valves for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in a Chinese population
title_short Propensity-matched comparison of balloon-expandable and self-expanding valves for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in a Chinese population
title_sort propensity-matched comparison of balloon-expandable and self-expanding valves for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in a chinese population
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8848425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35282054
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-6637
work_keys_str_mv AT ouyangwenbin propensitymatchedcomparisonofballoonexpandableandselfexpandingvalvesfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementinachinesepopulation
AT wangwei propensitymatchedcomparisonofballoonexpandableandselfexpandingvalvesfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementinachinesepopulation
AT dongjie propensitymatchedcomparisonofballoonexpandableandselfexpandingvalvesfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementinachinesepopulation
AT xieyongquan propensitymatchedcomparisonofballoonexpandableandselfexpandingvalvesfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementinachinesepopulation
AT wanjunyi propensitymatchedcomparisonofballoonexpandableandselfexpandingvalvesfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementinachinesepopulation
AT yueziqi propensitymatchedcomparisonofballoonexpandableandselfexpandingvalvesfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementinachinesepopulation
AT wangshouzheng propensitymatchedcomparisonofballoonexpandableandselfexpandingvalvesfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementinachinesepopulation
AT menghong propensitymatchedcomparisonofballoonexpandableandselfexpandingvalvesfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementinachinesepopulation
AT wangxu propensitymatchedcomparisonofballoonexpandableandselfexpandingvalvesfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementinachinesepopulation
AT xudonghui propensitymatchedcomparisonofballoonexpandableandselfexpandingvalvesfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementinachinesepopulation
AT zhangfengwen propensitymatchedcomparisonofballoonexpandableandselfexpandingvalvesfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementinachinesepopulation
AT dongjing propensitymatchedcomparisonofballoonexpandableandselfexpandingvalvesfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementinachinesepopulation
AT panxiangbin propensitymatchedcomparisonofballoonexpandableandselfexpandingvalvesfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementinachinesepopulation
AT zhanggejun propensitymatchedcomparisonofballoonexpandableandselfexpandingvalvesfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementinachinesepopulation