Cargando…
Propensity-matched comparison of balloon-expandable and self-expanding valves for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in a Chinese population
BACKGROUND: Balloon-expandable valves (BEV) and self-expanding valves (SEV) for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) have shown promising results in Western populations. Herein, we comparatively evaluated their hemodynamics and early clinical outcomes in a Chinese population. METHODS: One h...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8848425/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35282054 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-6637 |
_version_ | 1784652247740710912 |
---|---|
author | Ou-Yang, Wen-Bin Wang, Wei Dong, Jie Xie, Yong-Quan Wan, Jun-Yi Yue, Zi-Qi Wang, Shou-Zheng Meng, Hong Wang, Xu Xu, Dong-Hui Zhang, Feng-Wen Dong, Jing Pan, Xiang-Bin Zhang, Ge-Jun |
author_facet | Ou-Yang, Wen-Bin Wang, Wei Dong, Jie Xie, Yong-Quan Wan, Jun-Yi Yue, Zi-Qi Wang, Shou-Zheng Meng, Hong Wang, Xu Xu, Dong-Hui Zhang, Feng-Wen Dong, Jing Pan, Xiang-Bin Zhang, Ge-Jun |
author_sort | Ou-Yang, Wen-Bin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Balloon-expandable valves (BEV) and self-expanding valves (SEV) for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) have shown promising results in Western populations. Herein, we comparatively evaluated their hemodynamics and early clinical outcomes in a Chinese population. METHODS: One hundred seventy-eight patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis who had undergone transfemoral TAVR using SEV (n=153; Venus-A, 97; VitaFlow, 56) or BEV (n=25; Sapien3) from September 2020 to April 2021 were retrospectively enrolled, and 25 pairs were propensity-score matched for 10 baseline variables. The primary study outcomes were aortic valve hemodynamics and postoperative complications at discharge and 3-month follow-up. RESULTS: TAVR was successful in all patients. Compared with SEV group, the BEV group had similarly distributed baseline characteristics, procedural time, hospital stay, new pacemaker implantation, and paravalvular regurgitation grade. We also observed that the BEV group had lower rates of balloon pre-dilation (60% vs. 92%, P=0.018), post-dilation (0 vs. 20%, P=0.050) and second valve implantation (0 vs. 24%, P=0.022); higher mean transaortic gradient (14.3±6.1 vs. 10.8±4.9, P=0.030) and proportion of patients with elevated gradients (20% vs. 0, P=0.050) at discharge; and similar rehospitalization, mean transaortic gradient, new pacemaker implantation, and paravalvular regurgitation grade than the SEV group at the 3-month follow-up. There were no deaths in either group. However, the proportion of patients with elevated gradients in SEV group was higher at 3 months than before discharge (24% vs. 0, P=0.022). CONCLUSIONS: BEV and SEV for transfemoral TAVR appear comparably safe and effective, with high device success and favorable 3-month clinical outcomes. However, the transaortic gradient and new pacemaker implantation in the SEV group increased during follow-up, warranting larger studies with longer-term follow-up. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8848425 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88484252022-03-10 Propensity-matched comparison of balloon-expandable and self-expanding valves for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in a Chinese population Ou-Yang, Wen-Bin Wang, Wei Dong, Jie Xie, Yong-Quan Wan, Jun-Yi Yue, Zi-Qi Wang, Shou-Zheng Meng, Hong Wang, Xu Xu, Dong-Hui Zhang, Feng-Wen Dong, Jing Pan, Xiang-Bin Zhang, Ge-Jun Ann Transl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Balloon-expandable valves (BEV) and self-expanding valves (SEV) for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) have shown promising results in Western populations. Herein, we comparatively evaluated their hemodynamics and early clinical outcomes in a Chinese population. METHODS: One hundred seventy-eight patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis who had undergone transfemoral TAVR using SEV (n=153; Venus-A, 97; VitaFlow, 56) or BEV (n=25; Sapien3) from September 2020 to April 2021 were retrospectively enrolled, and 25 pairs were propensity-score matched for 10 baseline variables. The primary study outcomes were aortic valve hemodynamics and postoperative complications at discharge and 3-month follow-up. RESULTS: TAVR was successful in all patients. Compared with SEV group, the BEV group had similarly distributed baseline characteristics, procedural time, hospital stay, new pacemaker implantation, and paravalvular regurgitation grade. We also observed that the BEV group had lower rates of balloon pre-dilation (60% vs. 92%, P=0.018), post-dilation (0 vs. 20%, P=0.050) and second valve implantation (0 vs. 24%, P=0.022); higher mean transaortic gradient (14.3±6.1 vs. 10.8±4.9, P=0.030) and proportion of patients with elevated gradients (20% vs. 0, P=0.050) at discharge; and similar rehospitalization, mean transaortic gradient, new pacemaker implantation, and paravalvular regurgitation grade than the SEV group at the 3-month follow-up. There were no deaths in either group. However, the proportion of patients with elevated gradients in SEV group was higher at 3 months than before discharge (24% vs. 0, P=0.022). CONCLUSIONS: BEV and SEV for transfemoral TAVR appear comparably safe and effective, with high device success and favorable 3-month clinical outcomes. However, the transaortic gradient and new pacemaker implantation in the SEV group increased during follow-up, warranting larger studies with longer-term follow-up. AME Publishing Company 2022-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8848425/ /pubmed/35282054 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-6637 Text en 2022 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ou-Yang, Wen-Bin Wang, Wei Dong, Jie Xie, Yong-Quan Wan, Jun-Yi Yue, Zi-Qi Wang, Shou-Zheng Meng, Hong Wang, Xu Xu, Dong-Hui Zhang, Feng-Wen Dong, Jing Pan, Xiang-Bin Zhang, Ge-Jun Propensity-matched comparison of balloon-expandable and self-expanding valves for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in a Chinese population |
title | Propensity-matched comparison of balloon-expandable and self-expanding valves for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in a Chinese population |
title_full | Propensity-matched comparison of balloon-expandable and self-expanding valves for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in a Chinese population |
title_fullStr | Propensity-matched comparison of balloon-expandable and self-expanding valves for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in a Chinese population |
title_full_unstemmed | Propensity-matched comparison of balloon-expandable and self-expanding valves for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in a Chinese population |
title_short | Propensity-matched comparison of balloon-expandable and self-expanding valves for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in a Chinese population |
title_sort | propensity-matched comparison of balloon-expandable and self-expanding valves for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in a chinese population |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8848425/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35282054 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-6637 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ouyangwenbin propensitymatchedcomparisonofballoonexpandableandselfexpandingvalvesfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementinachinesepopulation AT wangwei propensitymatchedcomparisonofballoonexpandableandselfexpandingvalvesfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementinachinesepopulation AT dongjie propensitymatchedcomparisonofballoonexpandableandselfexpandingvalvesfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementinachinesepopulation AT xieyongquan propensitymatchedcomparisonofballoonexpandableandselfexpandingvalvesfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementinachinesepopulation AT wanjunyi propensitymatchedcomparisonofballoonexpandableandselfexpandingvalvesfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementinachinesepopulation AT yueziqi propensitymatchedcomparisonofballoonexpandableandselfexpandingvalvesfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementinachinesepopulation AT wangshouzheng propensitymatchedcomparisonofballoonexpandableandselfexpandingvalvesfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementinachinesepopulation AT menghong propensitymatchedcomparisonofballoonexpandableandselfexpandingvalvesfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementinachinesepopulation AT wangxu propensitymatchedcomparisonofballoonexpandableandselfexpandingvalvesfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementinachinesepopulation AT xudonghui propensitymatchedcomparisonofballoonexpandableandselfexpandingvalvesfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementinachinesepopulation AT zhangfengwen propensitymatchedcomparisonofballoonexpandableandselfexpandingvalvesfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementinachinesepopulation AT dongjing propensitymatchedcomparisonofballoonexpandableandselfexpandingvalvesfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementinachinesepopulation AT panxiangbin propensitymatchedcomparisonofballoonexpandableandselfexpandingvalvesfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementinachinesepopulation AT zhanggejun propensitymatchedcomparisonofballoonexpandableandselfexpandingvalvesfortranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementinachinesepopulation |