Cargando…

Diagnostic Accuracy of Calculated Tumor Volumes and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values in Predicting Endometrial Cancer Grade

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been shown to be an accurate imaging technique for the preoperative assessment of local staging of endometrial cancer and for evaluating the depth of myometrial invasion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective study performed on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kakkar, Chandan, Gupta, Kamini, Jain, Kunal, Narang, Vikram, Singh, Aminder, Saggar, Kavita, Bansal, Namita, Cioni, Dania, Neri, Emanuele
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8848552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35265479
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijabmr.ijabmr_553_21
_version_ 1784652274636685312
author Kakkar, Chandan
Gupta, Kamini
Jain, Kunal
Narang, Vikram
Singh, Aminder
Saggar, Kavita
Bansal, Namita
Cioni, Dania
Neri, Emanuele
author_facet Kakkar, Chandan
Gupta, Kamini
Jain, Kunal
Narang, Vikram
Singh, Aminder
Saggar, Kavita
Bansal, Namita
Cioni, Dania
Neri, Emanuele
author_sort Kakkar, Chandan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been shown to be an accurate imaging technique for the preoperative assessment of local staging of endometrial cancer and for evaluating the depth of myometrial invasion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective study performed on patients with histopathologically proven endometrial carcinoma who underwent an MRI examination of the pelvis between October 2017 and May 2020. RESULTS: In the present analysis, mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for each histologic grade were 0.72 ± 0.13 × 10(−3) mm(2)/s (G1), 0.76 ± 0.17 × 10(−3) mm(2)/s (G2), and 0.74 ± 0.12 × 10(−3) mm(2)/s (G3), respectively, showing no significant correlation between ADC values and tumor grade (P = 0.73). Overall, ADC minimum was significant in differentiating grades of endometrial carcinoma (P = 0.02) with the ability to differentiate Grade I and II lesions (P = 0.01). A mean tumor volume of 25.2 cc could differentiate low-grade tumors (Grade I and Grade II) from high-grade tumors (Grade III) with a sensitivity and specificity of 88% and specificity of 89%. The tumor volume/uterine volume ratio (TV/UV) differentiates high-grade tumors from low-grade tumors (P < 0.001), however, no significant difference in the ratio was observed among Grade I and II lesions (P = 0.48). The area under the curve of tumor volume was 0.875 (95% confidence interval 0.0–1.00) (P = 0.001), indicating that tumor volume was an effective tool for distinguishing high-grade and low-grade endometrioid adenocarcinomas. The corresponding sensitivity and specificity were 88.0% and 89.0%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Preoperative noninvasive radiological assessment for tumor volume, TV/ UV or tumor volume/uterine volume is important surrogate markers for preoperative prognostication of endometrial carcinoma.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8848552
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88485522022-03-08 Diagnostic Accuracy of Calculated Tumor Volumes and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values in Predicting Endometrial Cancer Grade Kakkar, Chandan Gupta, Kamini Jain, Kunal Narang, Vikram Singh, Aminder Saggar, Kavita Bansal, Namita Cioni, Dania Neri, Emanuele Int J Appl Basic Med Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been shown to be an accurate imaging technique for the preoperative assessment of local staging of endometrial cancer and for evaluating the depth of myometrial invasion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective study performed on patients with histopathologically proven endometrial carcinoma who underwent an MRI examination of the pelvis between October 2017 and May 2020. RESULTS: In the present analysis, mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for each histologic grade were 0.72 ± 0.13 × 10(−3) mm(2)/s (G1), 0.76 ± 0.17 × 10(−3) mm(2)/s (G2), and 0.74 ± 0.12 × 10(−3) mm(2)/s (G3), respectively, showing no significant correlation between ADC values and tumor grade (P = 0.73). Overall, ADC minimum was significant in differentiating grades of endometrial carcinoma (P = 0.02) with the ability to differentiate Grade I and II lesions (P = 0.01). A mean tumor volume of 25.2 cc could differentiate low-grade tumors (Grade I and Grade II) from high-grade tumors (Grade III) with a sensitivity and specificity of 88% and specificity of 89%. The tumor volume/uterine volume ratio (TV/UV) differentiates high-grade tumors from low-grade tumors (P < 0.001), however, no significant difference in the ratio was observed among Grade I and II lesions (P = 0.48). The area under the curve of tumor volume was 0.875 (95% confidence interval 0.0–1.00) (P = 0.001), indicating that tumor volume was an effective tool for distinguishing high-grade and low-grade endometrioid adenocarcinomas. The corresponding sensitivity and specificity were 88.0% and 89.0%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Preoperative noninvasive radiological assessment for tumor volume, TV/ UV or tumor volume/uterine volume is important surrogate markers for preoperative prognostication of endometrial carcinoma. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022 2022-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8848552/ /pubmed/35265479 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijabmr.ijabmr_553_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kakkar, Chandan
Gupta, Kamini
Jain, Kunal
Narang, Vikram
Singh, Aminder
Saggar, Kavita
Bansal, Namita
Cioni, Dania
Neri, Emanuele
Diagnostic Accuracy of Calculated Tumor Volumes and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values in Predicting Endometrial Cancer Grade
title Diagnostic Accuracy of Calculated Tumor Volumes and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values in Predicting Endometrial Cancer Grade
title_full Diagnostic Accuracy of Calculated Tumor Volumes and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values in Predicting Endometrial Cancer Grade
title_fullStr Diagnostic Accuracy of Calculated Tumor Volumes and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values in Predicting Endometrial Cancer Grade
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Accuracy of Calculated Tumor Volumes and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values in Predicting Endometrial Cancer Grade
title_short Diagnostic Accuracy of Calculated Tumor Volumes and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values in Predicting Endometrial Cancer Grade
title_sort diagnostic accuracy of calculated tumor volumes and apparent diffusion coefficient values in predicting endometrial cancer grade
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8848552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35265479
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijabmr.ijabmr_553_21
work_keys_str_mv AT kakkarchandan diagnosticaccuracyofcalculatedtumorvolumesandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvaluesinpredictingendometrialcancergrade
AT guptakamini diagnosticaccuracyofcalculatedtumorvolumesandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvaluesinpredictingendometrialcancergrade
AT jainkunal diagnosticaccuracyofcalculatedtumorvolumesandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvaluesinpredictingendometrialcancergrade
AT narangvikram diagnosticaccuracyofcalculatedtumorvolumesandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvaluesinpredictingendometrialcancergrade
AT singhaminder diagnosticaccuracyofcalculatedtumorvolumesandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvaluesinpredictingendometrialcancergrade
AT saggarkavita diagnosticaccuracyofcalculatedtumorvolumesandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvaluesinpredictingendometrialcancergrade
AT bansalnamita diagnosticaccuracyofcalculatedtumorvolumesandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvaluesinpredictingendometrialcancergrade
AT cionidania diagnosticaccuracyofcalculatedtumorvolumesandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvaluesinpredictingendometrialcancergrade
AT neriemanuele diagnosticaccuracyofcalculatedtumorvolumesandapparentdiffusioncoefficientvaluesinpredictingendometrialcancergrade