Cargando…
The accuracy of D-dimer in the diagnosis of periprosthetic infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It is scarce and contradicting evidence supporting the use of serum D-dimer to diagnose PJI in revision THA and TKA. This systematic review and meta-ana...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8848660/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35172830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03001-y |
_version_ | 1784652300529172480 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Renwei Zhang, Hui Ding, Peng Jiao, Qiang |
author_facet | Wang, Renwei Zhang, Hui Ding, Peng Jiao, Qiang |
author_sort | Wang, Renwei |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It is scarce and contradicting evidence supporting the use of serum D-dimer to diagnose PJI in revision THA and TKA. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the accuracy of D-dimer in the diagnosis of periprosthetic infections. METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science were systematically searched from the inception dates to August 15, 2020. We included all diagnostic studies of D-dimer in the diagnosis of periprosthetic infections. The literature's quality was evaluated by the QUADAS-2 tool, and Stata16 and Revman5.3 software carried out the meta-analysis. RESULTS: Of 115 citations identified by the search strategy, 10 studies (comprising 1756 participants) met the inclusion criteria. The literature quality assessment results show that most of the literature is low-risk bias literature. The combined sensitivity of D-dimer in diagnosing periprosthetic infections was 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71–0.88), combined specificity was 0.74 (95% CI 0.61–0.84), combined positive likelihood ratio was 3.1 (95% CI 2.0–5.0), combined negative likelihood ratio 0.26 (95% CI 0.16–0.41), combined diagnosis odds ratio 12 (95% CI 5–27), area under the Summary Receiver Operator Characteristic Curve (SROC) is 0.85 (95% CI 0.81–0.88). The data are statistically significant. CONCLUSION: D-dimer has a high diagnostic value in diagnosing PJI and has clinical significance in diagnosing periprosthetic infection. In addition, there are relatively few studies on the threshold of D-dimer, different sampling types, different laboratory detection methods, and different races, so more prospective trials with large samples, multi-centers, and scientific design should be carried out in the future. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-022-03001-y. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8848660 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88486602022-02-18 The accuracy of D-dimer in the diagnosis of periprosthetic infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis Wang, Renwei Zhang, Hui Ding, Peng Jiao, Qiang J Orthop Surg Res Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It is scarce and contradicting evidence supporting the use of serum D-dimer to diagnose PJI in revision THA and TKA. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the accuracy of D-dimer in the diagnosis of periprosthetic infections. METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science were systematically searched from the inception dates to August 15, 2020. We included all diagnostic studies of D-dimer in the diagnosis of periprosthetic infections. The literature's quality was evaluated by the QUADAS-2 tool, and Stata16 and Revman5.3 software carried out the meta-analysis. RESULTS: Of 115 citations identified by the search strategy, 10 studies (comprising 1756 participants) met the inclusion criteria. The literature quality assessment results show that most of the literature is low-risk bias literature. The combined sensitivity of D-dimer in diagnosing periprosthetic infections was 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71–0.88), combined specificity was 0.74 (95% CI 0.61–0.84), combined positive likelihood ratio was 3.1 (95% CI 2.0–5.0), combined negative likelihood ratio 0.26 (95% CI 0.16–0.41), combined diagnosis odds ratio 12 (95% CI 5–27), area under the Summary Receiver Operator Characteristic Curve (SROC) is 0.85 (95% CI 0.81–0.88). The data are statistically significant. CONCLUSION: D-dimer has a high diagnostic value in diagnosing PJI and has clinical significance in diagnosing periprosthetic infection. In addition, there are relatively few studies on the threshold of D-dimer, different sampling types, different laboratory detection methods, and different races, so more prospective trials with large samples, multi-centers, and scientific design should be carried out in the future. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-022-03001-y. BioMed Central 2022-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8848660/ /pubmed/35172830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03001-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Wang, Renwei Zhang, Hui Ding, Peng Jiao, Qiang The accuracy of D-dimer in the diagnosis of periprosthetic infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | The accuracy of D-dimer in the diagnosis of periprosthetic infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | The accuracy of D-dimer in the diagnosis of periprosthetic infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | The accuracy of D-dimer in the diagnosis of periprosthetic infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The accuracy of D-dimer in the diagnosis of periprosthetic infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | The accuracy of D-dimer in the diagnosis of periprosthetic infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | accuracy of d-dimer in the diagnosis of periprosthetic infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8848660/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35172830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03001-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangrenwei theaccuracyofddimerinthediagnosisofperiprostheticinfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhanghui theaccuracyofddimerinthediagnosisofperiprostheticinfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT dingpeng theaccuracyofddimerinthediagnosisofperiprostheticinfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jiaoqiang theaccuracyofddimerinthediagnosisofperiprostheticinfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangrenwei accuracyofddimerinthediagnosisofperiprostheticinfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhanghui accuracyofddimerinthediagnosisofperiprostheticinfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT dingpeng accuracyofddimerinthediagnosisofperiprostheticinfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jiaoqiang accuracyofddimerinthediagnosisofperiprostheticinfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |