Cargando…

The accuracy of D-dimer in the diagnosis of periprosthetic infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It is scarce and contradicting evidence supporting the use of serum D-dimer to diagnose PJI in revision THA and TKA. This systematic review and meta-ana...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Renwei, Zhang, Hui, Ding, Peng, Jiao, Qiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8848660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35172830
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03001-y
_version_ 1784652300529172480
author Wang, Renwei
Zhang, Hui
Ding, Peng
Jiao, Qiang
author_facet Wang, Renwei
Zhang, Hui
Ding, Peng
Jiao, Qiang
author_sort Wang, Renwei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It is scarce and contradicting evidence supporting the use of serum D-dimer to diagnose PJI in revision THA and TKA. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the accuracy of D-dimer in the diagnosis of periprosthetic infections. METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science were systematically searched from the inception dates to August 15, 2020. We included all diagnostic studies of D-dimer in the diagnosis of periprosthetic infections. The literature's quality was evaluated by the QUADAS-2 tool, and Stata16 and Revman5.3 software carried out the meta-analysis. RESULTS: Of 115 citations identified by the search strategy, 10 studies (comprising 1756 participants) met the inclusion criteria. The literature quality assessment results show that most of the literature is low-risk bias literature. The combined sensitivity of D-dimer in diagnosing periprosthetic infections was 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71–0.88), combined specificity was 0.74 (95% CI 0.61–0.84), combined positive likelihood ratio was 3.1 (95% CI 2.0–5.0), combined negative likelihood ratio 0.26 (95% CI 0.16–0.41), combined diagnosis odds ratio 12 (95% CI 5–27), area under the Summary Receiver Operator Characteristic Curve (SROC) is 0.85 (95% CI 0.81–0.88). The data are statistically significant. CONCLUSION: D-dimer has a high diagnostic value in diagnosing PJI and has clinical significance in diagnosing periprosthetic infection. In addition, there are relatively few studies on the threshold of D-dimer, different sampling types, different laboratory detection methods, and different races, so more prospective trials with large samples, multi-centers, and scientific design should be carried out in the future. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-022-03001-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8848660
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88486602022-02-18 The accuracy of D-dimer in the diagnosis of periprosthetic infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis Wang, Renwei Zhang, Hui Ding, Peng Jiao, Qiang J Orthop Surg Res Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It is scarce and contradicting evidence supporting the use of serum D-dimer to diagnose PJI in revision THA and TKA. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the accuracy of D-dimer in the diagnosis of periprosthetic infections. METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science were systematically searched from the inception dates to August 15, 2020. We included all diagnostic studies of D-dimer in the diagnosis of periprosthetic infections. The literature's quality was evaluated by the QUADAS-2 tool, and Stata16 and Revman5.3 software carried out the meta-analysis. RESULTS: Of 115 citations identified by the search strategy, 10 studies (comprising 1756 participants) met the inclusion criteria. The literature quality assessment results show that most of the literature is low-risk bias literature. The combined sensitivity of D-dimer in diagnosing periprosthetic infections was 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71–0.88), combined specificity was 0.74 (95% CI 0.61–0.84), combined positive likelihood ratio was 3.1 (95% CI 2.0–5.0), combined negative likelihood ratio 0.26 (95% CI 0.16–0.41), combined diagnosis odds ratio 12 (95% CI 5–27), area under the Summary Receiver Operator Characteristic Curve (SROC) is 0.85 (95% CI 0.81–0.88). The data are statistically significant. CONCLUSION: D-dimer has a high diagnostic value in diagnosing PJI and has clinical significance in diagnosing periprosthetic infection. In addition, there are relatively few studies on the threshold of D-dimer, different sampling types, different laboratory detection methods, and different races, so more prospective trials with large samples, multi-centers, and scientific design should be carried out in the future. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-022-03001-y. BioMed Central 2022-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8848660/ /pubmed/35172830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03001-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Wang, Renwei
Zhang, Hui
Ding, Peng
Jiao, Qiang
The accuracy of D-dimer in the diagnosis of periprosthetic infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title The accuracy of D-dimer in the diagnosis of periprosthetic infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full The accuracy of D-dimer in the diagnosis of periprosthetic infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr The accuracy of D-dimer in the diagnosis of periprosthetic infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The accuracy of D-dimer in the diagnosis of periprosthetic infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short The accuracy of D-dimer in the diagnosis of periprosthetic infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort accuracy of d-dimer in the diagnosis of periprosthetic infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8848660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35172830
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03001-y
work_keys_str_mv AT wangrenwei theaccuracyofddimerinthediagnosisofperiprostheticinfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhanghui theaccuracyofddimerinthediagnosisofperiprostheticinfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dingpeng theaccuracyofddimerinthediagnosisofperiprostheticinfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jiaoqiang theaccuracyofddimerinthediagnosisofperiprostheticinfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangrenwei accuracyofddimerinthediagnosisofperiprostheticinfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhanghui accuracyofddimerinthediagnosisofperiprostheticinfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dingpeng accuracyofddimerinthediagnosisofperiprostheticinfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jiaoqiang accuracyofddimerinthediagnosisofperiprostheticinfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis