Cargando…

Socioeconomic status and subjective social status measurement in KiGGS Wave 2

This article describes the method applied to measure socioeconomic status (SES) and subjective social status (SSS) in the current wave of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents (KiGGS Wave 2), which was conducted over three years between 2014 and 2017. The co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lampert, Thomas, Hoebel, Jens, Kuntz, Benjamin, Müters, Stephan, Kroll, Lars Eric
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Robert Koch Institute 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8848848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35586179
http://dx.doi.org/10.17886/RKI-GBE-2018-033
_version_ 1784652343974821888
author Lampert, Thomas
Hoebel, Jens
Kuntz, Benjamin
Müters, Stephan
Kroll, Lars Eric
author_facet Lampert, Thomas
Hoebel, Jens
Kuntz, Benjamin
Müters, Stephan
Kroll, Lars Eric
author_sort Lampert, Thomas
collection PubMed
description This article describes the method applied to measure socioeconomic status (SES) and subjective social status (SSS) in the current wave of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents (KiGGS Wave 2), which was conducted over three years between 2014 and 2017. The composite multidimensional SES index was calculated as a sum of point scores for the parents’ education level, occupational status and equivalised disposable income. SSS was assessed in the 11 to 17 year age group using a German version of the MacArthur Scale for children and adolescents. To demonstrate the use of both instruments, we present examples that highlight the association between SES and SSS with the general health of children and adolescents in the 3 to 17 and/or 11 to 17 age groups. Over 95% of parents rated the general health of their children as ‘very good’ or ‘good’. However, the analyses clearly reveal that children and adolescents from families with low SES and SSS have poorer general health than their better-off peers. Even when mutually adjusted, both low SES and SSS are independently associated with poorer general health. In addition to the SES index, studies on the health of children and adolescents should therefore also consider SSS. In this way, additional aspects of the socioeconomic conditions of families can be taken into account.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8848848
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Robert Koch Institute
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88488482022-05-17 Socioeconomic status and subjective social status measurement in KiGGS Wave 2 Lampert, Thomas Hoebel, Jens Kuntz, Benjamin Müters, Stephan Kroll, Lars Eric J Health Monit Concepts & Methods This article describes the method applied to measure socioeconomic status (SES) and subjective social status (SSS) in the current wave of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents (KiGGS Wave 2), which was conducted over three years between 2014 and 2017. The composite multidimensional SES index was calculated as a sum of point scores for the parents’ education level, occupational status and equivalised disposable income. SSS was assessed in the 11 to 17 year age group using a German version of the MacArthur Scale for children and adolescents. To demonstrate the use of both instruments, we present examples that highlight the association between SES and SSS with the general health of children and adolescents in the 3 to 17 and/or 11 to 17 age groups. Over 95% of parents rated the general health of their children as ‘very good’ or ‘good’. However, the analyses clearly reveal that children and adolescents from families with low SES and SSS have poorer general health than their better-off peers. Even when mutually adjusted, both low SES and SSS are independently associated with poorer general health. In addition to the SES index, studies on the health of children and adolescents should therefore also consider SSS. In this way, additional aspects of the socioeconomic conditions of families can be taken into account. Robert Koch Institute 2018-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8848848/ /pubmed/35586179 http://dx.doi.org/10.17886/RKI-GBE-2018-033 Text en © Robert Koch Institute. All rights reserved unless explicitly granted. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Concepts & Methods
Lampert, Thomas
Hoebel, Jens
Kuntz, Benjamin
Müters, Stephan
Kroll, Lars Eric
Socioeconomic status and subjective social status measurement in KiGGS Wave 2
title Socioeconomic status and subjective social status measurement in KiGGS Wave 2
title_full Socioeconomic status and subjective social status measurement in KiGGS Wave 2
title_fullStr Socioeconomic status and subjective social status measurement in KiGGS Wave 2
title_full_unstemmed Socioeconomic status and subjective social status measurement in KiGGS Wave 2
title_short Socioeconomic status and subjective social status measurement in KiGGS Wave 2
title_sort socioeconomic status and subjective social status measurement in kiggs wave 2
topic Concepts & Methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8848848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35586179
http://dx.doi.org/10.17886/RKI-GBE-2018-033
work_keys_str_mv AT lampertthomas socioeconomicstatusandsubjectivesocialstatusmeasurementinkiggswave2
AT hoebeljens socioeconomicstatusandsubjectivesocialstatusmeasurementinkiggswave2
AT kuntzbenjamin socioeconomicstatusandsubjectivesocialstatusmeasurementinkiggswave2
AT mutersstephan socioeconomicstatusandsubjectivesocialstatusmeasurementinkiggswave2
AT krolllarseric socioeconomicstatusandsubjectivesocialstatusmeasurementinkiggswave2