Cargando…
Comparison of self-sampling blood collection for N-glycosylation analysis
OBJECTIVE: Self-sampling of capillary blood provides easier sample collection, handling, and shipping compared to more invasive blood sampling via venepuncture. Recently, other means of capillary blood collection were introduced to the market, such as Neoteryx sticks and Noviplex cards. We tested th...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8849020/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35172879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-022-05958-9 |
_version_ | 1784652377908838400 |
---|---|
author | Cvetko, Ana Tijardović, Marko Bilandžija-Kuš, Iva Gornik, Olga |
author_facet | Cvetko, Ana Tijardović, Marko Bilandžija-Kuš, Iva Gornik, Olga |
author_sort | Cvetko, Ana |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Self-sampling of capillary blood provides easier sample collection, handling, and shipping compared to more invasive blood sampling via venepuncture. Recently, other means of capillary blood collection were introduced to the market, such as Neoteryx sticks and Noviplex cards. We tested the comparability of these two self-sampling methods, alongside dried blood spots (DBS), with plasma acquired from venepunctured blood in N-glycoprofiling of total proteins. We have also tested the intra-day repeatability of the three mentioned self-sampling methods. Capillary blood collection with Neoteryx, Noviplex and DBS was done following the manufacturers’ instructions and N-glycoprofiling of released, fluorescently labelled N-glycans was performed with ultra-performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: Comparability with plasma was assessed by calculating the relative deviance, which was 0.674 for DBS, 0.092 for Neoteryx sticks, and 0.069 for Noviplex cards. In repeatability testing, similar results were obtained, with Noviplex cards and Neoteryx sticks performing substantially better than DBS (CVs = 4.831% and 7.098%, compared to 14.305%, respectively). Our preliminary study on the use of Neoteryx and Noviplex self-sampling devices in glycoanalysis demonstrates their satisfactory performance in both the comparability and repeatability testing, however, they should be further tested in larger collaborations and cohorts. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13104-022-05958-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8849020 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88490202022-02-22 Comparison of self-sampling blood collection for N-glycosylation analysis Cvetko, Ana Tijardović, Marko Bilandžija-Kuš, Iva Gornik, Olga BMC Res Notes Research Note OBJECTIVE: Self-sampling of capillary blood provides easier sample collection, handling, and shipping compared to more invasive blood sampling via venepuncture. Recently, other means of capillary blood collection were introduced to the market, such as Neoteryx sticks and Noviplex cards. We tested the comparability of these two self-sampling methods, alongside dried blood spots (DBS), with plasma acquired from venepunctured blood in N-glycoprofiling of total proteins. We have also tested the intra-day repeatability of the three mentioned self-sampling methods. Capillary blood collection with Neoteryx, Noviplex and DBS was done following the manufacturers’ instructions and N-glycoprofiling of released, fluorescently labelled N-glycans was performed with ultra-performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: Comparability with plasma was assessed by calculating the relative deviance, which was 0.674 for DBS, 0.092 for Neoteryx sticks, and 0.069 for Noviplex cards. In repeatability testing, similar results were obtained, with Noviplex cards and Neoteryx sticks performing substantially better than DBS (CVs = 4.831% and 7.098%, compared to 14.305%, respectively). Our preliminary study on the use of Neoteryx and Noviplex self-sampling devices in glycoanalysis demonstrates their satisfactory performance in both the comparability and repeatability testing, however, they should be further tested in larger collaborations and cohorts. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13104-022-05958-9. BioMed Central 2022-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8849020/ /pubmed/35172879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-022-05958-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Note Cvetko, Ana Tijardović, Marko Bilandžija-Kuš, Iva Gornik, Olga Comparison of self-sampling blood collection for N-glycosylation analysis |
title | Comparison of self-sampling blood collection for N-glycosylation analysis |
title_full | Comparison of self-sampling blood collection for N-glycosylation analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparison of self-sampling blood collection for N-glycosylation analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of self-sampling blood collection for N-glycosylation analysis |
title_short | Comparison of self-sampling blood collection for N-glycosylation analysis |
title_sort | comparison of self-sampling blood collection for n-glycosylation analysis |
topic | Research Note |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8849020/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35172879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-022-05958-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cvetkoana comparisonofselfsamplingbloodcollectionfornglycosylationanalysis AT tijardovicmarko comparisonofselfsamplingbloodcollectionfornglycosylationanalysis AT bilandzijakusiva comparisonofselfsamplingbloodcollectionfornglycosylationanalysis AT gornikolga comparisonofselfsamplingbloodcollectionfornglycosylationanalysis |