Cargando…
Marker- three dimensional measurement versus traditional radiographic measurement in the treatment of tibial fracture using Taylor spatial frame
BACKGROUND: The Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF) has been widely used for tibial fracture. However, traditional radiographic measurement method is complicated and the reduction accuracy is affected by various factors. The purpose of this study was to propose a new marker- three dimensional (3D) measuremen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8849035/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35172802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05112-3 |
_version_ | 1784652379409350656 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Qixin Liu, Yanshi Li, Hong Fu, Xuefei Zhang, Xingpeng Liu, Sida Zhang, Jinli Zhang, Tao |
author_facet | Liu, Qixin Liu, Yanshi Li, Hong Fu, Xuefei Zhang, Xingpeng Liu, Sida Zhang, Jinli Zhang, Tao |
author_sort | Liu, Qixin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF) has been widely used for tibial fracture. However, traditional radiographic measurement method is complicated and the reduction accuracy is affected by various factors. The purpose of this study was to propose a new marker- three dimensional (3D) measurement method and determine the differences of reduction outcomes, if any, between marker-3D measurement method and traditional radiographic measurement in the TSF treatment. METHODS: Forty-one patients with tibial fracture treated by TSF in our institution were retrospectively analyzed from January 2016 to June 2019, including 21 patients in the marker-3D measurement group (experimental group) and 20 patients in the traditional radiographic measurement group (control group). In the experimental group, 3D reconstruction with 6 markers installed on the TSF was performed to determine the electronic prescription. In the control group, the anteroposterior (AP) and lateral radiographs were performed for the traditional parameter measurements. The effectiveness was evaluated by the residual displacement deformity (RDD) and residual angle deformity (RAD) in the coronal and sagittal plane, according to the AP and lateral X-rays after reduction. RESULTS: All patients achieved functional reduction. The residual RDD in AP view was 0.5 (0, 1.72) mm in experimental group and 1.74 (0.43, 3.67) mm in control group. The residual RAD in AP view was 0 (0, 1.25) ° in experimental group and 1.25 (0.62, 1.95) °in control group. As for the lateral view, the RDD was 0 (0, 1.22) mm in experimental group and 2.02 (0, 3.74) mm in control group, the RAD was 0 (0, 0) ° in experimental group and 1.42 (0, 1.93) ° in control group. Significant differences in all above comparisons were observed between the two groups (AP view RDD: P = 0.024, RAD: P = 0.020; Lateral view RDD: P = 0.016, RAD: P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: The present study introduced a marker-3D measurement method to complement the current TSF treatment. This method avoids the manual measurement error and improves the accuracy of fracture reduction, providing potential advantages of bone healing and function rehabilitation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8849035 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88490352022-02-22 Marker- three dimensional measurement versus traditional radiographic measurement in the treatment of tibial fracture using Taylor spatial frame Liu, Qixin Liu, Yanshi Li, Hong Fu, Xuefei Zhang, Xingpeng Liu, Sida Zhang, Jinli Zhang, Tao BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: The Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF) has been widely used for tibial fracture. However, traditional radiographic measurement method is complicated and the reduction accuracy is affected by various factors. The purpose of this study was to propose a new marker- three dimensional (3D) measurement method and determine the differences of reduction outcomes, if any, between marker-3D measurement method and traditional radiographic measurement in the TSF treatment. METHODS: Forty-one patients with tibial fracture treated by TSF in our institution were retrospectively analyzed from January 2016 to June 2019, including 21 patients in the marker-3D measurement group (experimental group) and 20 patients in the traditional radiographic measurement group (control group). In the experimental group, 3D reconstruction with 6 markers installed on the TSF was performed to determine the electronic prescription. In the control group, the anteroposterior (AP) and lateral radiographs were performed for the traditional parameter measurements. The effectiveness was evaluated by the residual displacement deformity (RDD) and residual angle deformity (RAD) in the coronal and sagittal plane, according to the AP and lateral X-rays after reduction. RESULTS: All patients achieved functional reduction. The residual RDD in AP view was 0.5 (0, 1.72) mm in experimental group and 1.74 (0.43, 3.67) mm in control group. The residual RAD in AP view was 0 (0, 1.25) ° in experimental group and 1.25 (0.62, 1.95) °in control group. As for the lateral view, the RDD was 0 (0, 1.22) mm in experimental group and 2.02 (0, 3.74) mm in control group, the RAD was 0 (0, 0) ° in experimental group and 1.42 (0, 1.93) ° in control group. Significant differences in all above comparisons were observed between the two groups (AP view RDD: P = 0.024, RAD: P = 0.020; Lateral view RDD: P = 0.016, RAD: P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: The present study introduced a marker-3D measurement method to complement the current TSF treatment. This method avoids the manual measurement error and improves the accuracy of fracture reduction, providing potential advantages of bone healing and function rehabilitation. BioMed Central 2022-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8849035/ /pubmed/35172802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05112-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Liu, Qixin Liu, Yanshi Li, Hong Fu, Xuefei Zhang, Xingpeng Liu, Sida Zhang, Jinli Zhang, Tao Marker- three dimensional measurement versus traditional radiographic measurement in the treatment of tibial fracture using Taylor spatial frame |
title | Marker- three dimensional measurement versus traditional radiographic measurement in the treatment of tibial fracture using Taylor spatial frame |
title_full | Marker- three dimensional measurement versus traditional radiographic measurement in the treatment of tibial fracture using Taylor spatial frame |
title_fullStr | Marker- three dimensional measurement versus traditional radiographic measurement in the treatment of tibial fracture using Taylor spatial frame |
title_full_unstemmed | Marker- three dimensional measurement versus traditional radiographic measurement in the treatment of tibial fracture using Taylor spatial frame |
title_short | Marker- three dimensional measurement versus traditional radiographic measurement in the treatment of tibial fracture using Taylor spatial frame |
title_sort | marker- three dimensional measurement versus traditional radiographic measurement in the treatment of tibial fracture using taylor spatial frame |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8849035/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35172802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05112-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuqixin markerthreedimensionalmeasurementversustraditionalradiographicmeasurementinthetreatmentoftibialfractureusingtaylorspatialframe AT liuyanshi markerthreedimensionalmeasurementversustraditionalradiographicmeasurementinthetreatmentoftibialfractureusingtaylorspatialframe AT lihong markerthreedimensionalmeasurementversustraditionalradiographicmeasurementinthetreatmentoftibialfractureusingtaylorspatialframe AT fuxuefei markerthreedimensionalmeasurementversustraditionalradiographicmeasurementinthetreatmentoftibialfractureusingtaylorspatialframe AT zhangxingpeng markerthreedimensionalmeasurementversustraditionalradiographicmeasurementinthetreatmentoftibialfractureusingtaylorspatialframe AT liusida markerthreedimensionalmeasurementversustraditionalradiographicmeasurementinthetreatmentoftibialfractureusingtaylorspatialframe AT zhangjinli markerthreedimensionalmeasurementversustraditionalradiographicmeasurementinthetreatmentoftibialfractureusingtaylorspatialframe AT zhangtao markerthreedimensionalmeasurementversustraditionalradiographicmeasurementinthetreatmentoftibialfractureusingtaylorspatialframe |