Cargando…

Head-to-Head Comparison of DH3 HPV Test and HC2 Assay for Detection of High-Risk HPV Infection in Residual Cytology Samples from Cervical Cancer Screening Setting: Baseline and 3-Year Longitudinal Data

The authors compared the clinical performance of DH3 human papillomavirus (HPV) assay, which detects 14 high-risk HPVs with 16/18 genotyping based on hybrid capture technique, and Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) test for women undergoing cervical cancer screening. A total of 7, 263 residual cytology specimen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fu, Yunfeng, Li, Xiao, Li, Ying, Lu, Weiguo, Xie, Xing, Wang, Xinyu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8849094/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35171029
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01570-21
_version_ 1784652394656694272
author Fu, Yunfeng
Li, Xiao
Li, Ying
Lu, Weiguo
Xie, Xing
Wang, Xinyu
author_facet Fu, Yunfeng
Li, Xiao
Li, Ying
Lu, Weiguo
Xie, Xing
Wang, Xinyu
author_sort Fu, Yunfeng
collection PubMed
description The authors compared the clinical performance of DH3 human papillomavirus (HPV) assay, which detects 14 high-risk HPVs with 16/18 genotyping based on hybrid capture technique, and Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) test for women undergoing cervical cancer screening. A total of 7, 263 residual cytology specimens from an adjudicated cohort with 3-year follow-up were tested by the DH3 assay and the HC2 test. Assay results were compared with each other and to histology review. The overall agreement between the DH3 assay and the HC2 test was 99.2% (κ = 0.938). At baseline, DH3 had the equal sensitivity to that of HC2 for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 2 or higher (CIN2+, n = 75) and CIN grade 3 or higher (CIN3+, n = 45), 98.67% and 97.78%, respectively. After 3 years of follow-up, the sensitivity for CIN2+ (n = 133) and CIN3+ (n = 74) were both similar between DH3 and HC2 (95.49% vs 94.74%, 95.95% vs 95.95%, respectively, all P > 0.05). The respective specificity for CIN2+ or CIN3+ did not differ between the two tests. A noninferiority test showed that both sensitivity and specificity of DH3 for CIN2+ and CIN3+ were noninferior to those of HC2 at baseline and after 3-year follow-up, respectively (all P < 0.001). When used in primary screening strategy, the DH3 assay would yield an immediate sensitivity of 92% for CIN2+. DH3 HPV performs equally to HC2 for the detection of high-grade lesions in cervical cancer screening and has a potential advantage in primary screening strategy due to HPV16/18 genotyping. IMPORTANCE The benefits of testing for high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) in cervical cancer screening have already been demonstrated. Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) is the best validated HPV assay and has been considered the gold standard for hrHPV testing. However, HC2 cannot discriminate HPV16 and 18 from the other hrHPV types, which greatly limited the application of HC2 in cervical cancer screening. The DH3 human papillomavirus (HPV) is a recently developed assay based on hybrid capture technique like to HC2, which can specifically identify HPV 16/18 on the basis of detecting the 13 hrHPV types targeted by HC2 as well as HPV66. This comparative study of the two assays for detection of hrHPV infection in residual cytology samples from cervical cancer screening setting reveals that DH3 HPV provides a perfect alternative to HC2 in detecting hrHPV infection and identifying cervical precancer, while allowing concurrent HPV 16/18 genotyping.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8849094
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Society for Microbiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88490942022-02-17 Head-to-Head Comparison of DH3 HPV Test and HC2 Assay for Detection of High-Risk HPV Infection in Residual Cytology Samples from Cervical Cancer Screening Setting: Baseline and 3-Year Longitudinal Data Fu, Yunfeng Li, Xiao Li, Ying Lu, Weiguo Xie, Xing Wang, Xinyu Microbiol Spectr Research Article The authors compared the clinical performance of DH3 human papillomavirus (HPV) assay, which detects 14 high-risk HPVs with 16/18 genotyping based on hybrid capture technique, and Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) test for women undergoing cervical cancer screening. A total of 7, 263 residual cytology specimens from an adjudicated cohort with 3-year follow-up were tested by the DH3 assay and the HC2 test. Assay results were compared with each other and to histology review. The overall agreement between the DH3 assay and the HC2 test was 99.2% (κ = 0.938). At baseline, DH3 had the equal sensitivity to that of HC2 for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 2 or higher (CIN2+, n = 75) and CIN grade 3 or higher (CIN3+, n = 45), 98.67% and 97.78%, respectively. After 3 years of follow-up, the sensitivity for CIN2+ (n = 133) and CIN3+ (n = 74) were both similar between DH3 and HC2 (95.49% vs 94.74%, 95.95% vs 95.95%, respectively, all P > 0.05). The respective specificity for CIN2+ or CIN3+ did not differ between the two tests. A noninferiority test showed that both sensitivity and specificity of DH3 for CIN2+ and CIN3+ were noninferior to those of HC2 at baseline and after 3-year follow-up, respectively (all P < 0.001). When used in primary screening strategy, the DH3 assay would yield an immediate sensitivity of 92% for CIN2+. DH3 HPV performs equally to HC2 for the detection of high-grade lesions in cervical cancer screening and has a potential advantage in primary screening strategy due to HPV16/18 genotyping. IMPORTANCE The benefits of testing for high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) in cervical cancer screening have already been demonstrated. Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) is the best validated HPV assay and has been considered the gold standard for hrHPV testing. However, HC2 cannot discriminate HPV16 and 18 from the other hrHPV types, which greatly limited the application of HC2 in cervical cancer screening. The DH3 human papillomavirus (HPV) is a recently developed assay based on hybrid capture technique like to HC2, which can specifically identify HPV 16/18 on the basis of detecting the 13 hrHPV types targeted by HC2 as well as HPV66. This comparative study of the two assays for detection of hrHPV infection in residual cytology samples from cervical cancer screening setting reveals that DH3 HPV provides a perfect alternative to HC2 in detecting hrHPV infection and identifying cervical precancer, while allowing concurrent HPV 16/18 genotyping. American Society for Microbiology 2022-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8849094/ /pubmed/35171029 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01570-21 Text en Copyright © 2022 Fu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
Fu, Yunfeng
Li, Xiao
Li, Ying
Lu, Weiguo
Xie, Xing
Wang, Xinyu
Head-to-Head Comparison of DH3 HPV Test and HC2 Assay for Detection of High-Risk HPV Infection in Residual Cytology Samples from Cervical Cancer Screening Setting: Baseline and 3-Year Longitudinal Data
title Head-to-Head Comparison of DH3 HPV Test and HC2 Assay for Detection of High-Risk HPV Infection in Residual Cytology Samples from Cervical Cancer Screening Setting: Baseline and 3-Year Longitudinal Data
title_full Head-to-Head Comparison of DH3 HPV Test and HC2 Assay for Detection of High-Risk HPV Infection in Residual Cytology Samples from Cervical Cancer Screening Setting: Baseline and 3-Year Longitudinal Data
title_fullStr Head-to-Head Comparison of DH3 HPV Test and HC2 Assay for Detection of High-Risk HPV Infection in Residual Cytology Samples from Cervical Cancer Screening Setting: Baseline and 3-Year Longitudinal Data
title_full_unstemmed Head-to-Head Comparison of DH3 HPV Test and HC2 Assay for Detection of High-Risk HPV Infection in Residual Cytology Samples from Cervical Cancer Screening Setting: Baseline and 3-Year Longitudinal Data
title_short Head-to-Head Comparison of DH3 HPV Test and HC2 Assay for Detection of High-Risk HPV Infection in Residual Cytology Samples from Cervical Cancer Screening Setting: Baseline and 3-Year Longitudinal Data
title_sort head-to-head comparison of dh3 hpv test and hc2 assay for detection of high-risk hpv infection in residual cytology samples from cervical cancer screening setting: baseline and 3-year longitudinal data
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8849094/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35171029
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01570-21
work_keys_str_mv AT fuyunfeng headtoheadcomparisonofdh3hpvtestandhc2assayfordetectionofhighriskhpvinfectioninresidualcytologysamplesfromcervicalcancerscreeningsettingbaselineand3yearlongitudinaldata
AT lixiao headtoheadcomparisonofdh3hpvtestandhc2assayfordetectionofhighriskhpvinfectioninresidualcytologysamplesfromcervicalcancerscreeningsettingbaselineand3yearlongitudinaldata
AT liying headtoheadcomparisonofdh3hpvtestandhc2assayfordetectionofhighriskhpvinfectioninresidualcytologysamplesfromcervicalcancerscreeningsettingbaselineand3yearlongitudinaldata
AT luweiguo headtoheadcomparisonofdh3hpvtestandhc2assayfordetectionofhighriskhpvinfectioninresidualcytologysamplesfromcervicalcancerscreeningsettingbaselineand3yearlongitudinaldata
AT xiexing headtoheadcomparisonofdh3hpvtestandhc2assayfordetectionofhighriskhpvinfectioninresidualcytologysamplesfromcervicalcancerscreeningsettingbaselineand3yearlongitudinaldata
AT wangxinyu headtoheadcomparisonofdh3hpvtestandhc2assayfordetectionofhighriskhpvinfectioninresidualcytologysamplesfromcervicalcancerscreeningsettingbaselineand3yearlongitudinaldata