Cargando…

Pragmatism as a paradigm for patient‐oriented research

BACKGROUND: Mixed methods research studies continue to pervade the field of health care, where pragmatism as a research paradigm and patient‐oriented research (POR) as an engagement strategy are combined to strengthen the process and outcomes of the research. Pragmatists use the most appropriate res...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Allemang, Brooke, Sitter, Kathleen, Dimitropoulos, Gina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8849373/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34748689
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13384
_version_ 1784652450305671168
author Allemang, Brooke
Sitter, Kathleen
Dimitropoulos, Gina
author_facet Allemang, Brooke
Sitter, Kathleen
Dimitropoulos, Gina
author_sort Allemang, Brooke
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mixed methods research studies continue to pervade the field of health care, where pragmatism as a research paradigm and patient‐oriented research (POR) as an engagement strategy are combined to strengthen the process and outcomes of the research. Pragmatists use the most appropriate research methods to address issues at hand, where complex social problems need multipronged approaches. As an emerging healthcare research strategy, POR actively engages individuals with lived experience across all stages of the research process. While POR continues to garner attention within mixed‐methods research designs, there is a paucity of literature that considers POR in relation to pragmatism. OBJECTIVE: As POR grows in popularity within the field of health care, there is a need to explore the theoretical and epistemological alignment with pragmatism and the implications to research. METHODS: To address this need, we provide a critical review of the literature to examine the synergies between POR and pragmatism, and argue for the adoption of pragmatism as a paradigm for conducting POR. MAIN RESULTS: This article begins with a discussion of the philosophical underpinnings informing the pragmatic paradigm. It then identifies key alignments between POR and pragmatism across three intersecting concepts: democratic values, collaborative approaches to problem‐solving and the pursuit of social justice. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Reflecting on our experiences engaging with patient partners in a mixed‐methods POR study titled READY2Exit, we illustrate the relevance of pragmatism to POR by applying these concepts to practice. Implications and considerations for conducting POR within the pragmatic paradigm are also described. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This paper provides a critical review of the literature and did not directly involve patients or the public. The authors reflected on their experiences collaborating with five young adult patient partners in the READY2Exit study (case exemplar described in this article) to demonstrate the relevance of the pragmatic paradigm to POR. We acknowledge and thank the young adult patient partners for their contributions to the research, for encouraging us to think critically about patient engagement in research, and for sharing their experiences.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8849373
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88493732022-02-25 Pragmatism as a paradigm for patient‐oriented research Allemang, Brooke Sitter, Kathleen Dimitropoulos, Gina Health Expect Review Articles BACKGROUND: Mixed methods research studies continue to pervade the field of health care, where pragmatism as a research paradigm and patient‐oriented research (POR) as an engagement strategy are combined to strengthen the process and outcomes of the research. Pragmatists use the most appropriate research methods to address issues at hand, where complex social problems need multipronged approaches. As an emerging healthcare research strategy, POR actively engages individuals with lived experience across all stages of the research process. While POR continues to garner attention within mixed‐methods research designs, there is a paucity of literature that considers POR in relation to pragmatism. OBJECTIVE: As POR grows in popularity within the field of health care, there is a need to explore the theoretical and epistemological alignment with pragmatism and the implications to research. METHODS: To address this need, we provide a critical review of the literature to examine the synergies between POR and pragmatism, and argue for the adoption of pragmatism as a paradigm for conducting POR. MAIN RESULTS: This article begins with a discussion of the philosophical underpinnings informing the pragmatic paradigm. It then identifies key alignments between POR and pragmatism across three intersecting concepts: democratic values, collaborative approaches to problem‐solving and the pursuit of social justice. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Reflecting on our experiences engaging with patient partners in a mixed‐methods POR study titled READY2Exit, we illustrate the relevance of pragmatism to POR by applying these concepts to practice. Implications and considerations for conducting POR within the pragmatic paradigm are also described. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This paper provides a critical review of the literature and did not directly involve patients or the public. The authors reflected on their experiences collaborating with five young adult patient partners in the READY2Exit study (case exemplar described in this article) to demonstrate the relevance of the pragmatic paradigm to POR. We acknowledge and thank the young adult patient partners for their contributions to the research, for encouraging us to think critically about patient engagement in research, and for sharing their experiences. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-11-08 2022-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8849373/ /pubmed/34748689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13384 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Allemang, Brooke
Sitter, Kathleen
Dimitropoulos, Gina
Pragmatism as a paradigm for patient‐oriented research
title Pragmatism as a paradigm for patient‐oriented research
title_full Pragmatism as a paradigm for patient‐oriented research
title_fullStr Pragmatism as a paradigm for patient‐oriented research
title_full_unstemmed Pragmatism as a paradigm for patient‐oriented research
title_short Pragmatism as a paradigm for patient‐oriented research
title_sort pragmatism as a paradigm for patient‐oriented research
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8849373/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34748689
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13384
work_keys_str_mv AT allemangbrooke pragmatismasaparadigmforpatientorientedresearch
AT sitterkathleen pragmatismasaparadigmforpatientorientedresearch
AT dimitropoulosgina pragmatismasaparadigmforpatientorientedresearch