Cargando…

Development and Evaluation of a Remote Patient Monitoring System in Autologous Breast Reconstruction

Flap monitoring after a deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction is crucial to detect complications in time. A novel and innovative wireless device has been developed and tested in a feasibility study. This study describes our experience with remote patient monitoring via this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hummelink, Stefan L.M., Paulus, Vera A.A., Wentink, Eva C., Ulrich, Dietmar J.O.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8849395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35186614
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004008
_version_ 1784652455835860992
author Hummelink, Stefan L.M.
Paulus, Vera A.A.
Wentink, Eva C.
Ulrich, Dietmar J.O.
author_facet Hummelink, Stefan L.M.
Paulus, Vera A.A.
Wentink, Eva C.
Ulrich, Dietmar J.O.
author_sort Hummelink, Stefan L.M.
collection PubMed
description Flap monitoring after a deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction is crucial to detect complications in time. A novel and innovative wireless device has been developed and tested in a feasibility study. This study describes our experience with remote patient monitoring via this device in postoperative monitoring of deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps. METHODS: Following a deep inferior epigastric perforator breast reconstruction, the “Free Flap Patch” was adhered to the flap, continuously measuring temperature and tissue saturation. Data were stored locally on the patch and analyzed in a retrospective manner. Raw analog-digital-conversion values from the red- and infrared sensors, delta muscle saturation (dSmO(2)), and estimated tissue oxygenation (StO(2)) were assessed and compared with clinical records. RESULTS: No adverse events related to the device were recorded. One patient suffered flap loss; a decrease in estimated tissue oxygenation was measured with the device in situ. No deviations in clinical variables were recorded in the uncompromised flaps. CONCLUSIONS: A wearable patient monitoring device was successfully utilized in clinical practice. In one patient, a flap failure was recorded where the PPG-derived StO(2) parameter was indicatory for this event. The Free Flap Patch has the potential of automatically predicting blood supply issues in an early stage. More data are needed for clinical validation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8849395
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88493952022-02-18 Development and Evaluation of a Remote Patient Monitoring System in Autologous Breast Reconstruction Hummelink, Stefan L.M. Paulus, Vera A.A. Wentink, Eva C. Ulrich, Dietmar J.O. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Reconstructive Flap monitoring after a deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction is crucial to detect complications in time. A novel and innovative wireless device has been developed and tested in a feasibility study. This study describes our experience with remote patient monitoring via this device in postoperative monitoring of deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps. METHODS: Following a deep inferior epigastric perforator breast reconstruction, the “Free Flap Patch” was adhered to the flap, continuously measuring temperature and tissue saturation. Data were stored locally on the patch and analyzed in a retrospective manner. Raw analog-digital-conversion values from the red- and infrared sensors, delta muscle saturation (dSmO(2)), and estimated tissue oxygenation (StO(2)) were assessed and compared with clinical records. RESULTS: No adverse events related to the device were recorded. One patient suffered flap loss; a decrease in estimated tissue oxygenation was measured with the device in situ. No deviations in clinical variables were recorded in the uncompromised flaps. CONCLUSIONS: A wearable patient monitoring device was successfully utilized in clinical practice. In one patient, a flap failure was recorded where the PPG-derived StO(2) parameter was indicatory for this event. The Free Flap Patch has the potential of automatically predicting blood supply issues in an early stage. More data are needed for clinical validation. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8849395/ /pubmed/35186614 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004008 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Reconstructive
Hummelink, Stefan L.M.
Paulus, Vera A.A.
Wentink, Eva C.
Ulrich, Dietmar J.O.
Development and Evaluation of a Remote Patient Monitoring System in Autologous Breast Reconstruction
title Development and Evaluation of a Remote Patient Monitoring System in Autologous Breast Reconstruction
title_full Development and Evaluation of a Remote Patient Monitoring System in Autologous Breast Reconstruction
title_fullStr Development and Evaluation of a Remote Patient Monitoring System in Autologous Breast Reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Development and Evaluation of a Remote Patient Monitoring System in Autologous Breast Reconstruction
title_short Development and Evaluation of a Remote Patient Monitoring System in Autologous Breast Reconstruction
title_sort development and evaluation of a remote patient monitoring system in autologous breast reconstruction
topic Reconstructive
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8849395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35186614
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004008
work_keys_str_mv AT hummelinkstefanlm developmentandevaluationofaremotepatientmonitoringsysteminautologousbreastreconstruction
AT paulusveraaa developmentandevaluationofaremotepatientmonitoringsysteminautologousbreastreconstruction
AT wentinkevac developmentandevaluationofaremotepatientmonitoringsysteminautologousbreastreconstruction
AT ulrichdietmarjo developmentandevaluationofaremotepatientmonitoringsysteminautologousbreastreconstruction