Cargando…
The Comparison of Fixed and Flexible Progestin Primed Ovarian Stimulation on Mature Oocyte Yield in Women at Risk of Premature Ovarian Insufficiency
While gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists have been the standard of pituitary suppression during ovarian stimulation for ART, progestin primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) has emerged as an alternative. Progestins can be started simultaneously with gonadotrophins (fixed PPOS) or later i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8850276/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35185784 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.797227 |
_version_ | 1784652559768616960 |
---|---|
author | Kalafat, Erkan Dizdar, Merve Turkgeldi, Engin Yildiz, Sule Keles, Ipek Ata, Baris |
author_facet | Kalafat, Erkan Dizdar, Merve Turkgeldi, Engin Yildiz, Sule Keles, Ipek Ata, Baris |
author_sort | Kalafat, Erkan |
collection | PubMed |
description | While gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists have been the standard of pituitary suppression during ovarian stimulation for ART, progestin primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) has emerged as an alternative. Progestins can be started simultaneously with gonadotrophins (fixed PPOS) or later in the cycle depending on follicle growth (flexible PPOS). However, the flexible and fixed PPOS regimens have not been directly compared as of yet. This was a retrospective cohort study including women with diminished ovarian reserve who underwent oocyte cryopreservation. All women underwent ovarian stimulation with a fixed 300 IU daily dose of FSH. The primary outcome was the number of MII oocyte retrieved per cycle. Secondary outcome measures included the incidence of premature LH surge (>10ng/mL) and number of follicles larger than 14mm on the day of maturation trigger. During the screening period 2 out of 97 cycles were cancelled before oocyte retrieval, one in each group yielding an overall cancelation rate of 2%. Among women who had oocyte retrieval, 65 underwent flexible and 30 fixed PPOS. At baseline women on fixed and flexible PPOS had similar age (mean difference: -2.17 years, 95% CI: -4.46 to 0.11) and serum AMH levels (mean difference: 0.10 ng/mL, 95% CI: -0.24 to 0.47). Slight imbalances between the groups were rectified with propensity score matching using age and AMH levels. The incidence of premature LH surge (RR: 1.47, 95% CI: 0.51 – 5.27, p = 0.50), follicle count larger than 14mm on hCG day (RR: 1.14, 95% CI: 0.93 – 1.42, p = 0.22), number of MII oocytes retrieved (RR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.79 – 1.15, p = 0.61) were similar between flexible and fixed PPOS. The rate of no oocyte retrieval was same between the groups (0.0% both) but no formal estimation was possible. Flexible and fixed PPOS regimens had no appreciable differences regarding MII oocyte yield and the incidence of premature LH surges. Cycles without oocyte retrieval were rare in both groups and ultrasonographic parameters of gonadotropin response were similar. Our study suggests the performances of either progestin regimen are comparable in this group of women. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8850276 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88502762022-02-18 The Comparison of Fixed and Flexible Progestin Primed Ovarian Stimulation on Mature Oocyte Yield in Women at Risk of Premature Ovarian Insufficiency Kalafat, Erkan Dizdar, Merve Turkgeldi, Engin Yildiz, Sule Keles, Ipek Ata, Baris Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology While gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists have been the standard of pituitary suppression during ovarian stimulation for ART, progestin primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) has emerged as an alternative. Progestins can be started simultaneously with gonadotrophins (fixed PPOS) or later in the cycle depending on follicle growth (flexible PPOS). However, the flexible and fixed PPOS regimens have not been directly compared as of yet. This was a retrospective cohort study including women with diminished ovarian reserve who underwent oocyte cryopreservation. All women underwent ovarian stimulation with a fixed 300 IU daily dose of FSH. The primary outcome was the number of MII oocyte retrieved per cycle. Secondary outcome measures included the incidence of premature LH surge (>10ng/mL) and number of follicles larger than 14mm on the day of maturation trigger. During the screening period 2 out of 97 cycles were cancelled before oocyte retrieval, one in each group yielding an overall cancelation rate of 2%. Among women who had oocyte retrieval, 65 underwent flexible and 30 fixed PPOS. At baseline women on fixed and flexible PPOS had similar age (mean difference: -2.17 years, 95% CI: -4.46 to 0.11) and serum AMH levels (mean difference: 0.10 ng/mL, 95% CI: -0.24 to 0.47). Slight imbalances between the groups were rectified with propensity score matching using age and AMH levels. The incidence of premature LH surge (RR: 1.47, 95% CI: 0.51 – 5.27, p = 0.50), follicle count larger than 14mm on hCG day (RR: 1.14, 95% CI: 0.93 – 1.42, p = 0.22), number of MII oocytes retrieved (RR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.79 – 1.15, p = 0.61) were similar between flexible and fixed PPOS. The rate of no oocyte retrieval was same between the groups (0.0% both) but no formal estimation was possible. Flexible and fixed PPOS regimens had no appreciable differences regarding MII oocyte yield and the incidence of premature LH surges. Cycles without oocyte retrieval were rare in both groups and ultrasonographic parameters of gonadotropin response were similar. Our study suggests the performances of either progestin regimen are comparable in this group of women. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8850276/ /pubmed/35185784 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.797227 Text en Copyright © 2022 Kalafat, Dizdar, Turkgeldi, Yildiz, Keles and Ata https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Endocrinology Kalafat, Erkan Dizdar, Merve Turkgeldi, Engin Yildiz, Sule Keles, Ipek Ata, Baris The Comparison of Fixed and Flexible Progestin Primed Ovarian Stimulation on Mature Oocyte Yield in Women at Risk of Premature Ovarian Insufficiency |
title | The Comparison of Fixed and Flexible Progestin Primed Ovarian Stimulation on Mature Oocyte Yield in Women at Risk of Premature Ovarian Insufficiency |
title_full | The Comparison of Fixed and Flexible Progestin Primed Ovarian Stimulation on Mature Oocyte Yield in Women at Risk of Premature Ovarian Insufficiency |
title_fullStr | The Comparison of Fixed and Flexible Progestin Primed Ovarian Stimulation on Mature Oocyte Yield in Women at Risk of Premature Ovarian Insufficiency |
title_full_unstemmed | The Comparison of Fixed and Flexible Progestin Primed Ovarian Stimulation on Mature Oocyte Yield in Women at Risk of Premature Ovarian Insufficiency |
title_short | The Comparison of Fixed and Flexible Progestin Primed Ovarian Stimulation on Mature Oocyte Yield in Women at Risk of Premature Ovarian Insufficiency |
title_sort | comparison of fixed and flexible progestin primed ovarian stimulation on mature oocyte yield in women at risk of premature ovarian insufficiency |
topic | Endocrinology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8850276/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35185784 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.797227 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kalafaterkan thecomparisonoffixedandflexibleprogestinprimedovarianstimulationonmatureoocyteyieldinwomenatriskofprematureovarianinsufficiency AT dizdarmerve thecomparisonoffixedandflexibleprogestinprimedovarianstimulationonmatureoocyteyieldinwomenatriskofprematureovarianinsufficiency AT turkgeldiengin thecomparisonoffixedandflexibleprogestinprimedovarianstimulationonmatureoocyteyieldinwomenatriskofprematureovarianinsufficiency AT yildizsule thecomparisonoffixedandflexibleprogestinprimedovarianstimulationonmatureoocyteyieldinwomenatriskofprematureovarianinsufficiency AT kelesipek thecomparisonoffixedandflexibleprogestinprimedovarianstimulationonmatureoocyteyieldinwomenatriskofprematureovarianinsufficiency AT atabaris thecomparisonoffixedandflexibleprogestinprimedovarianstimulationonmatureoocyteyieldinwomenatriskofprematureovarianinsufficiency AT kalafaterkan comparisonoffixedandflexibleprogestinprimedovarianstimulationonmatureoocyteyieldinwomenatriskofprematureovarianinsufficiency AT dizdarmerve comparisonoffixedandflexibleprogestinprimedovarianstimulationonmatureoocyteyieldinwomenatriskofprematureovarianinsufficiency AT turkgeldiengin comparisonoffixedandflexibleprogestinprimedovarianstimulationonmatureoocyteyieldinwomenatriskofprematureovarianinsufficiency AT yildizsule comparisonoffixedandflexibleprogestinprimedovarianstimulationonmatureoocyteyieldinwomenatriskofprematureovarianinsufficiency AT kelesipek comparisonoffixedandflexibleprogestinprimedovarianstimulationonmatureoocyteyieldinwomenatriskofprematureovarianinsufficiency AT atabaris comparisonoffixedandflexibleprogestinprimedovarianstimulationonmatureoocyteyieldinwomenatriskofprematureovarianinsufficiency |