Cargando…

The Comparison of Fixed and Flexible Progestin Primed Ovarian Stimulation on Mature Oocyte Yield in Women at Risk of Premature Ovarian Insufficiency

While gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists have been the standard of pituitary suppression during ovarian stimulation for ART, progestin primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) has emerged as an alternative. Progestins can be started simultaneously with gonadotrophins (fixed PPOS) or later i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kalafat, Erkan, Dizdar, Merve, Turkgeldi, Engin, Yildiz, Sule, Keles, Ipek, Ata, Baris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8850276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35185784
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.797227
_version_ 1784652559768616960
author Kalafat, Erkan
Dizdar, Merve
Turkgeldi, Engin
Yildiz, Sule
Keles, Ipek
Ata, Baris
author_facet Kalafat, Erkan
Dizdar, Merve
Turkgeldi, Engin
Yildiz, Sule
Keles, Ipek
Ata, Baris
author_sort Kalafat, Erkan
collection PubMed
description While gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists have been the standard of pituitary suppression during ovarian stimulation for ART, progestin primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) has emerged as an alternative. Progestins can be started simultaneously with gonadotrophins (fixed PPOS) or later in the cycle depending on follicle growth (flexible PPOS). However, the flexible and fixed PPOS regimens have not been directly compared as of yet. This was a retrospective cohort study including women with diminished ovarian reserve who underwent oocyte cryopreservation. All women underwent ovarian stimulation with a fixed 300 IU daily dose of FSH. The primary outcome was the number of MII oocyte retrieved per cycle. Secondary outcome measures included the incidence of premature LH surge (>10ng/mL) and number of follicles larger than 14mm on the day of maturation trigger. During the screening period 2 out of 97 cycles were cancelled before oocyte retrieval, one in each group yielding an overall cancelation rate of 2%. Among women who had oocyte retrieval, 65 underwent flexible and 30 fixed PPOS. At baseline women on fixed and flexible PPOS had similar age (mean difference: -2.17 years, 95% CI: -4.46 to 0.11) and serum AMH levels (mean difference: 0.10 ng/mL, 95% CI: -0.24 to 0.47). Slight imbalances between the groups were rectified with propensity score matching using age and AMH levels. The incidence of premature LH surge (RR: 1.47, 95% CI: 0.51 – 5.27, p = 0.50), follicle count larger than 14mm on hCG day (RR: 1.14, 95% CI: 0.93 – 1.42, p = 0.22), number of MII oocytes retrieved (RR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.79 – 1.15, p = 0.61) were similar between flexible and fixed PPOS. The rate of no oocyte retrieval was same between the groups (0.0% both) but no formal estimation was possible. Flexible and fixed PPOS regimens had no appreciable differences regarding MII oocyte yield and the incidence of premature LH surges. Cycles without oocyte retrieval were rare in both groups and ultrasonographic parameters of gonadotropin response were similar. Our study suggests the performances of either progestin regimen are comparable in this group of women.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8850276
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88502762022-02-18 The Comparison of Fixed and Flexible Progestin Primed Ovarian Stimulation on Mature Oocyte Yield in Women at Risk of Premature Ovarian Insufficiency Kalafat, Erkan Dizdar, Merve Turkgeldi, Engin Yildiz, Sule Keles, Ipek Ata, Baris Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology While gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists have been the standard of pituitary suppression during ovarian stimulation for ART, progestin primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) has emerged as an alternative. Progestins can be started simultaneously with gonadotrophins (fixed PPOS) or later in the cycle depending on follicle growth (flexible PPOS). However, the flexible and fixed PPOS regimens have not been directly compared as of yet. This was a retrospective cohort study including women with diminished ovarian reserve who underwent oocyte cryopreservation. All women underwent ovarian stimulation with a fixed 300 IU daily dose of FSH. The primary outcome was the number of MII oocyte retrieved per cycle. Secondary outcome measures included the incidence of premature LH surge (>10ng/mL) and number of follicles larger than 14mm on the day of maturation trigger. During the screening period 2 out of 97 cycles were cancelled before oocyte retrieval, one in each group yielding an overall cancelation rate of 2%. Among women who had oocyte retrieval, 65 underwent flexible and 30 fixed PPOS. At baseline women on fixed and flexible PPOS had similar age (mean difference: -2.17 years, 95% CI: -4.46 to 0.11) and serum AMH levels (mean difference: 0.10 ng/mL, 95% CI: -0.24 to 0.47). Slight imbalances between the groups were rectified with propensity score matching using age and AMH levels. The incidence of premature LH surge (RR: 1.47, 95% CI: 0.51 – 5.27, p = 0.50), follicle count larger than 14mm on hCG day (RR: 1.14, 95% CI: 0.93 – 1.42, p = 0.22), number of MII oocytes retrieved (RR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.79 – 1.15, p = 0.61) were similar between flexible and fixed PPOS. The rate of no oocyte retrieval was same between the groups (0.0% both) but no formal estimation was possible. Flexible and fixed PPOS regimens had no appreciable differences regarding MII oocyte yield and the incidence of premature LH surges. Cycles without oocyte retrieval were rare in both groups and ultrasonographic parameters of gonadotropin response were similar. Our study suggests the performances of either progestin regimen are comparable in this group of women. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8850276/ /pubmed/35185784 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.797227 Text en Copyright © 2022 Kalafat, Dizdar, Turkgeldi, Yildiz, Keles and Ata https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Endocrinology
Kalafat, Erkan
Dizdar, Merve
Turkgeldi, Engin
Yildiz, Sule
Keles, Ipek
Ata, Baris
The Comparison of Fixed and Flexible Progestin Primed Ovarian Stimulation on Mature Oocyte Yield in Women at Risk of Premature Ovarian Insufficiency
title The Comparison of Fixed and Flexible Progestin Primed Ovarian Stimulation on Mature Oocyte Yield in Women at Risk of Premature Ovarian Insufficiency
title_full The Comparison of Fixed and Flexible Progestin Primed Ovarian Stimulation on Mature Oocyte Yield in Women at Risk of Premature Ovarian Insufficiency
title_fullStr The Comparison of Fixed and Flexible Progestin Primed Ovarian Stimulation on Mature Oocyte Yield in Women at Risk of Premature Ovarian Insufficiency
title_full_unstemmed The Comparison of Fixed and Flexible Progestin Primed Ovarian Stimulation on Mature Oocyte Yield in Women at Risk of Premature Ovarian Insufficiency
title_short The Comparison of Fixed and Flexible Progestin Primed Ovarian Stimulation on Mature Oocyte Yield in Women at Risk of Premature Ovarian Insufficiency
title_sort comparison of fixed and flexible progestin primed ovarian stimulation on mature oocyte yield in women at risk of premature ovarian insufficiency
topic Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8850276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35185784
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.797227
work_keys_str_mv AT kalafaterkan thecomparisonoffixedandflexibleprogestinprimedovarianstimulationonmatureoocyteyieldinwomenatriskofprematureovarianinsufficiency
AT dizdarmerve thecomparisonoffixedandflexibleprogestinprimedovarianstimulationonmatureoocyteyieldinwomenatriskofprematureovarianinsufficiency
AT turkgeldiengin thecomparisonoffixedandflexibleprogestinprimedovarianstimulationonmatureoocyteyieldinwomenatriskofprematureovarianinsufficiency
AT yildizsule thecomparisonoffixedandflexibleprogestinprimedovarianstimulationonmatureoocyteyieldinwomenatriskofprematureovarianinsufficiency
AT kelesipek thecomparisonoffixedandflexibleprogestinprimedovarianstimulationonmatureoocyteyieldinwomenatriskofprematureovarianinsufficiency
AT atabaris thecomparisonoffixedandflexibleprogestinprimedovarianstimulationonmatureoocyteyieldinwomenatriskofprematureovarianinsufficiency
AT kalafaterkan comparisonoffixedandflexibleprogestinprimedovarianstimulationonmatureoocyteyieldinwomenatriskofprematureovarianinsufficiency
AT dizdarmerve comparisonoffixedandflexibleprogestinprimedovarianstimulationonmatureoocyteyieldinwomenatriskofprematureovarianinsufficiency
AT turkgeldiengin comparisonoffixedandflexibleprogestinprimedovarianstimulationonmatureoocyteyieldinwomenatriskofprematureovarianinsufficiency
AT yildizsule comparisonoffixedandflexibleprogestinprimedovarianstimulationonmatureoocyteyieldinwomenatriskofprematureovarianinsufficiency
AT kelesipek comparisonoffixedandflexibleprogestinprimedovarianstimulationonmatureoocyteyieldinwomenatriskofprematureovarianinsufficiency
AT atabaris comparisonoffixedandflexibleprogestinprimedovarianstimulationonmatureoocyteyieldinwomenatriskofprematureovarianinsufficiency