Cargando…

Taxonomical Evaluation of Plant Chloroplastic Markers by Bayesian Classifier

DNA barcodes are standardized sequences that range between 400 and 800 bp, vary at different taxonomic levels, and make it possible to assign sequences to species that have been previously taxonomically characterized. Several DNA barcodes have been postulated for plants, nonetheless, their classific...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matiz-Ceron, Luisa, Reyes, Alejandro, Anzola, Juan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8850773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35185949
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.782663
_version_ 1784652671762825216
author Matiz-Ceron, Luisa
Reyes, Alejandro
Anzola, Juan
author_facet Matiz-Ceron, Luisa
Reyes, Alejandro
Anzola, Juan
author_sort Matiz-Ceron, Luisa
collection PubMed
description DNA barcodes are standardized sequences that range between 400 and 800 bp, vary at different taxonomic levels, and make it possible to assign sequences to species that have been previously taxonomically characterized. Several DNA barcodes have been postulated for plants, nonetheless, their classification potential has not been evaluated for metabarcoding, and as a result, it would appear as none of them excels above the others in this area. One tool that has been widely used and served as a baseline when evaluating new approaches is Naïve Bayesian Classifiers (NBC). The present study aims at evaluating the classification power of several plant chloroplast genetic markers that have been proposed as barcodes (trnL, rpoB, rbcL, matK, psbA-trnH, and psbK) using an NBC. We performed the classification at different taxonomic levels, and identified problematic genera when resolution was desired. We propose matK and trnL as potential candidate markers with resolution up to genus level. Some problematic genera within certain families could lead to the misclassification no matter which marker is used (i.e., Aegilops, Gueldenstaedtia, Helianthus, Oryza, Shorea, Thysananthus, and Triticum). Finally, we suggest recommendations for the taxonomic identification of plants in samples with potential mixtures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8850773
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88507732022-02-18 Taxonomical Evaluation of Plant Chloroplastic Markers by Bayesian Classifier Matiz-Ceron, Luisa Reyes, Alejandro Anzola, Juan Front Plant Sci Plant Science DNA barcodes are standardized sequences that range between 400 and 800 bp, vary at different taxonomic levels, and make it possible to assign sequences to species that have been previously taxonomically characterized. Several DNA barcodes have been postulated for plants, nonetheless, their classification potential has not been evaluated for metabarcoding, and as a result, it would appear as none of them excels above the others in this area. One tool that has been widely used and served as a baseline when evaluating new approaches is Naïve Bayesian Classifiers (NBC). The present study aims at evaluating the classification power of several plant chloroplast genetic markers that have been proposed as barcodes (trnL, rpoB, rbcL, matK, psbA-trnH, and psbK) using an NBC. We performed the classification at different taxonomic levels, and identified problematic genera when resolution was desired. We propose matK and trnL as potential candidate markers with resolution up to genus level. Some problematic genera within certain families could lead to the misclassification no matter which marker is used (i.e., Aegilops, Gueldenstaedtia, Helianthus, Oryza, Shorea, Thysananthus, and Triticum). Finally, we suggest recommendations for the taxonomic identification of plants in samples with potential mixtures. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8850773/ /pubmed/35185949 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.782663 Text en Copyright © 2022 Matiz-Ceron, Reyes and Anzola. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
Matiz-Ceron, Luisa
Reyes, Alejandro
Anzola, Juan
Taxonomical Evaluation of Plant Chloroplastic Markers by Bayesian Classifier
title Taxonomical Evaluation of Plant Chloroplastic Markers by Bayesian Classifier
title_full Taxonomical Evaluation of Plant Chloroplastic Markers by Bayesian Classifier
title_fullStr Taxonomical Evaluation of Plant Chloroplastic Markers by Bayesian Classifier
title_full_unstemmed Taxonomical Evaluation of Plant Chloroplastic Markers by Bayesian Classifier
title_short Taxonomical Evaluation of Plant Chloroplastic Markers by Bayesian Classifier
title_sort taxonomical evaluation of plant chloroplastic markers by bayesian classifier
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8850773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35185949
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.782663
work_keys_str_mv AT matizceronluisa taxonomicalevaluationofplantchloroplasticmarkersbybayesianclassifier
AT reyesalejandro taxonomicalevaluationofplantchloroplasticmarkersbybayesianclassifier
AT anzolajuan taxonomicalevaluationofplantchloroplasticmarkersbybayesianclassifier