Cargando…

Endoscopic characteristics in predicting prognosis of biopsy-diagnosed gastric low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic biopsy can underestimate gastric malignancies as low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN). Definitively diagnosed LGIN would progress. This study aimed to evaluate predictive factors to identify malignancies misdiagnosed as LGIN by biopsy and LGIN at high risk of progression...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zou, Long, Jiang, Qingwei, Guo, Tao, Wu, Xi, Wang, Qiang, Feng, Yunlu, Zhang, Shengyu, Fang, Weigang, Zhou, Weixun, Yang, Aiming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8850827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34873080
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000001637
_version_ 1784652685089177600
author Zou, Long
Jiang, Qingwei
Guo, Tao
Wu, Xi
Wang, Qiang
Feng, Yunlu
Zhang, Shengyu
Fang, Weigang
Zhou, Weixun
Yang, Aiming
author_facet Zou, Long
Jiang, Qingwei
Guo, Tao
Wu, Xi
Wang, Qiang
Feng, Yunlu
Zhang, Shengyu
Fang, Weigang
Zhou, Weixun
Yang, Aiming
author_sort Zou, Long
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Endoscopic biopsy can underestimate gastric malignancies as low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN). Definitively diagnosed LGIN would progress. This study aimed to evaluate predictive factors to identify malignancies misdiagnosed as LGIN by biopsy and LGIN at high risk of progression. METHODS: The clinical records of patients diagnosed with gastric LGIN by endoscopic biopsy who underwent at least two endoscopies during the first year of follow-up between 2007 and 2017 were retrospectively collected. Three endoscopists reviewed photographs of the initial endoscopy, described lesion characteristics, and made endoscopic diagnoses. Logistic regression was used to analyze predictors to identify malignancies underestimated as LGIN. A receiver operating characteristic curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of these predictors. Patient clinical outcomes of follow-up >1 year were collected. Kaplan–Meier estimates with log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to analyze predictors of progression. RESULTS: Overall, 48 of 182 (26.4%) patients were proven to have malignancies. A single lesion, a large lesion size, and marked intestinal metaplasia (IM) were independent predictors of initially misdiagnosed malignancies. The area under the curve of these predictors was 0.871, with a sensitivity of 68.7% and specificity of 92.5%. Twelve of 98 patients (12.2%) progressed during the 33-month median follow-up period. A whitish appearance, irregular margins, marked IM, and histological diagnosis of LGIN more than twice within the first year were predictors for progression. CONCLUSIONS: Lesions diagnosed as LGIN by biopsy with marked IM and other predictors above should be prudently treated for high potential to be malignancies or progress. Endoscopic follow-up with repeated biopsies within the first year is recommended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8850827
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88508272022-02-18 Endoscopic characteristics in predicting prognosis of biopsy-diagnosed gastric low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia Zou, Long Jiang, Qingwei Guo, Tao Wu, Xi Wang, Qiang Feng, Yunlu Zhang, Shengyu Fang, Weigang Zhou, Weixun Yang, Aiming Chin Med J (Engl) Original Articles BACKGROUND: Endoscopic biopsy can underestimate gastric malignancies as low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN). Definitively diagnosed LGIN would progress. This study aimed to evaluate predictive factors to identify malignancies misdiagnosed as LGIN by biopsy and LGIN at high risk of progression. METHODS: The clinical records of patients diagnosed with gastric LGIN by endoscopic biopsy who underwent at least two endoscopies during the first year of follow-up between 2007 and 2017 were retrospectively collected. Three endoscopists reviewed photographs of the initial endoscopy, described lesion characteristics, and made endoscopic diagnoses. Logistic regression was used to analyze predictors to identify malignancies underestimated as LGIN. A receiver operating characteristic curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of these predictors. Patient clinical outcomes of follow-up >1 year were collected. Kaplan–Meier estimates with log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to analyze predictors of progression. RESULTS: Overall, 48 of 182 (26.4%) patients were proven to have malignancies. A single lesion, a large lesion size, and marked intestinal metaplasia (IM) were independent predictors of initially misdiagnosed malignancies. The area under the curve of these predictors was 0.871, with a sensitivity of 68.7% and specificity of 92.5%. Twelve of 98 patients (12.2%) progressed during the 33-month median follow-up period. A whitish appearance, irregular margins, marked IM, and histological diagnosis of LGIN more than twice within the first year were predictors for progression. CONCLUSIONS: Lesions diagnosed as LGIN by biopsy with marked IM and other predictors above should be prudently treated for high potential to be malignancies or progress. Endoscopic follow-up with repeated biopsies within the first year is recommended. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-01-05 2021-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8850827/ /pubmed/34873080 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000001637 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Chinese Medical Association, produced by Wolters Kluwer, Inc. under the CC-BY-NC-ND license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Articles
Zou, Long
Jiang, Qingwei
Guo, Tao
Wu, Xi
Wang, Qiang
Feng, Yunlu
Zhang, Shengyu
Fang, Weigang
Zhou, Weixun
Yang, Aiming
Endoscopic characteristics in predicting prognosis of biopsy-diagnosed gastric low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia
title Endoscopic characteristics in predicting prognosis of biopsy-diagnosed gastric low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia
title_full Endoscopic characteristics in predicting prognosis of biopsy-diagnosed gastric low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia
title_fullStr Endoscopic characteristics in predicting prognosis of biopsy-diagnosed gastric low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia
title_full_unstemmed Endoscopic characteristics in predicting prognosis of biopsy-diagnosed gastric low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia
title_short Endoscopic characteristics in predicting prognosis of biopsy-diagnosed gastric low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia
title_sort endoscopic characteristics in predicting prognosis of biopsy-diagnosed gastric low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8850827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34873080
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000001637
work_keys_str_mv AT zoulong endoscopiccharacteristicsinpredictingprognosisofbiopsydiagnosedgastriclowgradeintraepithelialneoplasia
AT jiangqingwei endoscopiccharacteristicsinpredictingprognosisofbiopsydiagnosedgastriclowgradeintraepithelialneoplasia
AT guotao endoscopiccharacteristicsinpredictingprognosisofbiopsydiagnosedgastriclowgradeintraepithelialneoplasia
AT wuxi endoscopiccharacteristicsinpredictingprognosisofbiopsydiagnosedgastriclowgradeintraepithelialneoplasia
AT wangqiang endoscopiccharacteristicsinpredictingprognosisofbiopsydiagnosedgastriclowgradeintraepithelialneoplasia
AT fengyunlu endoscopiccharacteristicsinpredictingprognosisofbiopsydiagnosedgastriclowgradeintraepithelialneoplasia
AT zhangshengyu endoscopiccharacteristicsinpredictingprognosisofbiopsydiagnosedgastriclowgradeintraepithelialneoplasia
AT fangweigang endoscopiccharacteristicsinpredictingprognosisofbiopsydiagnosedgastriclowgradeintraepithelialneoplasia
AT zhouweixun endoscopiccharacteristicsinpredictingprognosisofbiopsydiagnosedgastriclowgradeintraepithelialneoplasia
AT yangaiming endoscopiccharacteristicsinpredictingprognosisofbiopsydiagnosedgastriclowgradeintraepithelialneoplasia