Cargando…

Differential Influence of Physical Activity on Cardiopulmonary Performance and Stroke Volume Assessed at Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test in Pectus Excavatum: A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND: Exercise training increases muscle VO(2) by increasing O(2) transport and O(2) uptake while cardiac output increase might be limited by the conformation of the chest in subjects with pectus excavatum (PE). AIMS: The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of physical ac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Casatori, Lorenzo, Pellegrino, Alessio, Messineo, Antonio, Ghionzoli, Marco, Facchini, Flavio, Modesti, Alessandra, Modesti, Pietro Amedeo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8850936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35185624
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.831504
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Exercise training increases muscle VO(2) by increasing O(2) transport and O(2) uptake while cardiac output increase might be limited by the conformation of the chest in subjects with pectus excavatum (PE). AIMS: The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of physical activity (PA) on functional parameters of cardiopulmonary performance and stroke volume obtained at Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test (CPET) in PE. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: A cohort of adolescents (15 with PE and 15 age- and sex-matched healthy controls, HC) underwent Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test (CPET) and administration of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire – Short Form (IPAQ-SF) with estimation of weekly PA (METs h(–1)⋅week(–1)). Determinants of CPET parameters were investigated with multivariable linear regression analysis. RESULTS: As expected, when compared to HC, PE had lower VO(2) max (37.2 ± 6.6 vs. 45.4 ± 6.4 mL⋅kg(–1)⋅min(–1), p < 0.05), and VO(2)/HR max (O(2) pulse, 12.1 ± 2.4 vs. 16.2 ± 3.6 mL⋅min(–1)⋅bpm(–1), p < 0.05). Importantly, physical activity level was a predictor of VO(2) max (adjusted for sex, body mass index, FEV(1)%, and presence of PE, β = 0.085; 95% Cl 0.010 to 0.160, p = 0.029) whereas O(2) pulse was independent from PA level (β = 0.035; 95% Cl −0.004 to 0.074). CONCLUSION: Physical activity is a determinant of VO(2) max (cardiopulmonary performance), whereas it appears not to affect O(2) pulse (a measure of stroke volume at peak exercise) related to constrained diastolic filling in PE.