Cargando…

Fat Quantification Imaging and Biophysical Modeling for Patient-Specific Forecasting of Microwave Ablation Therapy

Computational tools are beginning to enable patient-specific surgical planning to localize and prescribe thermal dosing for liver cancer ablation therapy. Tissue-specific factors (e.g., tissue perfusion, material properties, disease state, etc.) have been found to affect ablative therapies, but curr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Servin, Frankangel, Collins, Jarrod A., Heiselman, Jon S., Frederick-Dyer, Katherine C., Planz, Virginia B., Geevarghese, Sunil K., Brown, Daniel B., Miga, Michael I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8850958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35185606
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.820251
_version_ 1784652721666654208
author Servin, Frankangel
Collins, Jarrod A.
Heiselman, Jon S.
Frederick-Dyer, Katherine C.
Planz, Virginia B.
Geevarghese, Sunil K.
Brown, Daniel B.
Miga, Michael I.
author_facet Servin, Frankangel
Collins, Jarrod A.
Heiselman, Jon S.
Frederick-Dyer, Katherine C.
Planz, Virginia B.
Geevarghese, Sunil K.
Brown, Daniel B.
Miga, Michael I.
author_sort Servin, Frankangel
collection PubMed
description Computational tools are beginning to enable patient-specific surgical planning to localize and prescribe thermal dosing for liver cancer ablation therapy. Tissue-specific factors (e.g., tissue perfusion, material properties, disease state, etc.) have been found to affect ablative therapies, but current thermal dosing guidance practices do not account for these differences. Computational modeling of ablation procedures can integrate these sources of patient specificity to guide therapy planning and delivery. This paper establishes an imaging-data-driven framework for patient-specific biophysical modeling to predict ablation extents in livers with varying fat content in the context of microwave ablation (MWA) therapy. Patient anatomic scans were segmented to develop customized three-dimensional computational biophysical models and mDIXON fat-quantification images were acquired and analyzed to establish fat content and determine biophysical properties. Simulated patient-specific microwave ablations of tumor and healthy tissue were performed at four levels of fatty liver disease. Ablation models with greater fat content demonstrated significantly larger treatment volumes compared to livers with less severe disease states. More specifically, the results indicated an eightfold larger difference in necrotic volumes with fatty livers vs. the effects from the presence of more conductive tumor tissue. Additionally, the evolution of necrotic volume formation as a function of the thermal dose was influenced by the presence of a tumor. Fat quantification imaging showed multi-valued spatially heterogeneous distributions of fat deposition, even within their respective disease classifications (e.g., low, mild, moderate, high-fat). Altogether, the results suggest that clinical fatty liver disease levels can affect MWA, and that fat-quantitative imaging data may improve patient specificity for this treatment modality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8850958
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88509582022-02-18 Fat Quantification Imaging and Biophysical Modeling for Patient-Specific Forecasting of Microwave Ablation Therapy Servin, Frankangel Collins, Jarrod A. Heiselman, Jon S. Frederick-Dyer, Katherine C. Planz, Virginia B. Geevarghese, Sunil K. Brown, Daniel B. Miga, Michael I. Front Physiol Physiology Computational tools are beginning to enable patient-specific surgical planning to localize and prescribe thermal dosing for liver cancer ablation therapy. Tissue-specific factors (e.g., tissue perfusion, material properties, disease state, etc.) have been found to affect ablative therapies, but current thermal dosing guidance practices do not account for these differences. Computational modeling of ablation procedures can integrate these sources of patient specificity to guide therapy planning and delivery. This paper establishes an imaging-data-driven framework for patient-specific biophysical modeling to predict ablation extents in livers with varying fat content in the context of microwave ablation (MWA) therapy. Patient anatomic scans were segmented to develop customized three-dimensional computational biophysical models and mDIXON fat-quantification images were acquired and analyzed to establish fat content and determine biophysical properties. Simulated patient-specific microwave ablations of tumor and healthy tissue were performed at four levels of fatty liver disease. Ablation models with greater fat content demonstrated significantly larger treatment volumes compared to livers with less severe disease states. More specifically, the results indicated an eightfold larger difference in necrotic volumes with fatty livers vs. the effects from the presence of more conductive tumor tissue. Additionally, the evolution of necrotic volume formation as a function of the thermal dose was influenced by the presence of a tumor. Fat quantification imaging showed multi-valued spatially heterogeneous distributions of fat deposition, even within their respective disease classifications (e.g., low, mild, moderate, high-fat). Altogether, the results suggest that clinical fatty liver disease levels can affect MWA, and that fat-quantitative imaging data may improve patient specificity for this treatment modality. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8850958/ /pubmed/35185606 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.820251 Text en Copyright © 2022 Servin, Collins, Heiselman, Frederick-Dyer, Planz, Geevarghese, Brown and Miga. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Servin, Frankangel
Collins, Jarrod A.
Heiselman, Jon S.
Frederick-Dyer, Katherine C.
Planz, Virginia B.
Geevarghese, Sunil K.
Brown, Daniel B.
Miga, Michael I.
Fat Quantification Imaging and Biophysical Modeling for Patient-Specific Forecasting of Microwave Ablation Therapy
title Fat Quantification Imaging and Biophysical Modeling for Patient-Specific Forecasting of Microwave Ablation Therapy
title_full Fat Quantification Imaging and Biophysical Modeling for Patient-Specific Forecasting of Microwave Ablation Therapy
title_fullStr Fat Quantification Imaging and Biophysical Modeling for Patient-Specific Forecasting of Microwave Ablation Therapy
title_full_unstemmed Fat Quantification Imaging and Biophysical Modeling for Patient-Specific Forecasting of Microwave Ablation Therapy
title_short Fat Quantification Imaging and Biophysical Modeling for Patient-Specific Forecasting of Microwave Ablation Therapy
title_sort fat quantification imaging and biophysical modeling for patient-specific forecasting of microwave ablation therapy
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8850958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35185606
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.820251
work_keys_str_mv AT servinfrankangel fatquantificationimagingandbiophysicalmodelingforpatientspecificforecastingofmicrowaveablationtherapy
AT collinsjarroda fatquantificationimagingandbiophysicalmodelingforpatientspecificforecastingofmicrowaveablationtherapy
AT heiselmanjons fatquantificationimagingandbiophysicalmodelingforpatientspecificforecastingofmicrowaveablationtherapy
AT frederickdyerkatherinec fatquantificationimagingandbiophysicalmodelingforpatientspecificforecastingofmicrowaveablationtherapy
AT planzvirginiab fatquantificationimagingandbiophysicalmodelingforpatientspecificforecastingofmicrowaveablationtherapy
AT geevarghesesunilk fatquantificationimagingandbiophysicalmodelingforpatientspecificforecastingofmicrowaveablationtherapy
AT browndanielb fatquantificationimagingandbiophysicalmodelingforpatientspecificforecastingofmicrowaveablationtherapy
AT migamichaeli fatquantificationimagingandbiophysicalmodelingforpatientspecificforecastingofmicrowaveablationtherapy