Cargando…
Fat Quantification Imaging and Biophysical Modeling for Patient-Specific Forecasting of Microwave Ablation Therapy
Computational tools are beginning to enable patient-specific surgical planning to localize and prescribe thermal dosing for liver cancer ablation therapy. Tissue-specific factors (e.g., tissue perfusion, material properties, disease state, etc.) have been found to affect ablative therapies, but curr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8850958/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35185606 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.820251 |
_version_ | 1784652721666654208 |
---|---|
author | Servin, Frankangel Collins, Jarrod A. Heiselman, Jon S. Frederick-Dyer, Katherine C. Planz, Virginia B. Geevarghese, Sunil K. Brown, Daniel B. Miga, Michael I. |
author_facet | Servin, Frankangel Collins, Jarrod A. Heiselman, Jon S. Frederick-Dyer, Katherine C. Planz, Virginia B. Geevarghese, Sunil K. Brown, Daniel B. Miga, Michael I. |
author_sort | Servin, Frankangel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Computational tools are beginning to enable patient-specific surgical planning to localize and prescribe thermal dosing for liver cancer ablation therapy. Tissue-specific factors (e.g., tissue perfusion, material properties, disease state, etc.) have been found to affect ablative therapies, but current thermal dosing guidance practices do not account for these differences. Computational modeling of ablation procedures can integrate these sources of patient specificity to guide therapy planning and delivery. This paper establishes an imaging-data-driven framework for patient-specific biophysical modeling to predict ablation extents in livers with varying fat content in the context of microwave ablation (MWA) therapy. Patient anatomic scans were segmented to develop customized three-dimensional computational biophysical models and mDIXON fat-quantification images were acquired and analyzed to establish fat content and determine biophysical properties. Simulated patient-specific microwave ablations of tumor and healthy tissue were performed at four levels of fatty liver disease. Ablation models with greater fat content demonstrated significantly larger treatment volumes compared to livers with less severe disease states. More specifically, the results indicated an eightfold larger difference in necrotic volumes with fatty livers vs. the effects from the presence of more conductive tumor tissue. Additionally, the evolution of necrotic volume formation as a function of the thermal dose was influenced by the presence of a tumor. Fat quantification imaging showed multi-valued spatially heterogeneous distributions of fat deposition, even within their respective disease classifications (e.g., low, mild, moderate, high-fat). Altogether, the results suggest that clinical fatty liver disease levels can affect MWA, and that fat-quantitative imaging data may improve patient specificity for this treatment modality. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8850958 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88509582022-02-18 Fat Quantification Imaging and Biophysical Modeling for Patient-Specific Forecasting of Microwave Ablation Therapy Servin, Frankangel Collins, Jarrod A. Heiselman, Jon S. Frederick-Dyer, Katherine C. Planz, Virginia B. Geevarghese, Sunil K. Brown, Daniel B. Miga, Michael I. Front Physiol Physiology Computational tools are beginning to enable patient-specific surgical planning to localize and prescribe thermal dosing for liver cancer ablation therapy. Tissue-specific factors (e.g., tissue perfusion, material properties, disease state, etc.) have been found to affect ablative therapies, but current thermal dosing guidance practices do not account for these differences. Computational modeling of ablation procedures can integrate these sources of patient specificity to guide therapy planning and delivery. This paper establishes an imaging-data-driven framework for patient-specific biophysical modeling to predict ablation extents in livers with varying fat content in the context of microwave ablation (MWA) therapy. Patient anatomic scans were segmented to develop customized three-dimensional computational biophysical models and mDIXON fat-quantification images were acquired and analyzed to establish fat content and determine biophysical properties. Simulated patient-specific microwave ablations of tumor and healthy tissue were performed at four levels of fatty liver disease. Ablation models with greater fat content demonstrated significantly larger treatment volumes compared to livers with less severe disease states. More specifically, the results indicated an eightfold larger difference in necrotic volumes with fatty livers vs. the effects from the presence of more conductive tumor tissue. Additionally, the evolution of necrotic volume formation as a function of the thermal dose was influenced by the presence of a tumor. Fat quantification imaging showed multi-valued spatially heterogeneous distributions of fat deposition, even within their respective disease classifications (e.g., low, mild, moderate, high-fat). Altogether, the results suggest that clinical fatty liver disease levels can affect MWA, and that fat-quantitative imaging data may improve patient specificity for this treatment modality. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8850958/ /pubmed/35185606 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.820251 Text en Copyright © 2022 Servin, Collins, Heiselman, Frederick-Dyer, Planz, Geevarghese, Brown and Miga. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Physiology Servin, Frankangel Collins, Jarrod A. Heiselman, Jon S. Frederick-Dyer, Katherine C. Planz, Virginia B. Geevarghese, Sunil K. Brown, Daniel B. Miga, Michael I. Fat Quantification Imaging and Biophysical Modeling for Patient-Specific Forecasting of Microwave Ablation Therapy |
title | Fat Quantification Imaging and Biophysical Modeling for Patient-Specific Forecasting of Microwave Ablation Therapy |
title_full | Fat Quantification Imaging and Biophysical Modeling for Patient-Specific Forecasting of Microwave Ablation Therapy |
title_fullStr | Fat Quantification Imaging and Biophysical Modeling for Patient-Specific Forecasting of Microwave Ablation Therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Fat Quantification Imaging and Biophysical Modeling for Patient-Specific Forecasting of Microwave Ablation Therapy |
title_short | Fat Quantification Imaging and Biophysical Modeling for Patient-Specific Forecasting of Microwave Ablation Therapy |
title_sort | fat quantification imaging and biophysical modeling for patient-specific forecasting of microwave ablation therapy |
topic | Physiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8850958/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35185606 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.820251 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT servinfrankangel fatquantificationimagingandbiophysicalmodelingforpatientspecificforecastingofmicrowaveablationtherapy AT collinsjarroda fatquantificationimagingandbiophysicalmodelingforpatientspecificforecastingofmicrowaveablationtherapy AT heiselmanjons fatquantificationimagingandbiophysicalmodelingforpatientspecificforecastingofmicrowaveablationtherapy AT frederickdyerkatherinec fatquantificationimagingandbiophysicalmodelingforpatientspecificforecastingofmicrowaveablationtherapy AT planzvirginiab fatquantificationimagingandbiophysicalmodelingforpatientspecificforecastingofmicrowaveablationtherapy AT geevarghesesunilk fatquantificationimagingandbiophysicalmodelingforpatientspecificforecastingofmicrowaveablationtherapy AT browndanielb fatquantificationimagingandbiophysicalmodelingforpatientspecificforecastingofmicrowaveablationtherapy AT migamichaeli fatquantificationimagingandbiophysicalmodelingforpatientspecificforecastingofmicrowaveablationtherapy |