Cargando…

Comparison of Various Vagal Maneuvers for Supraventricular Tachycardia by Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: Vagal maneuvers (VagMs) are recommended as the first-line treatment of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). However, the optimal type of VagMs remains unproven. AIM: This study aims to compare the effectiveness and adverse events amongst VagMs on SVT via network meta-analyses (NMAs). METH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Edward Pei-Chuan, Chen, Chi-Hsin, Fan, Cheng-Yi, Sung, Chih-Wei, Lai, Pei Chun, Huang, Yen Ta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8850969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35186966
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.769437
_version_ 1784652725989933056
author Huang, Edward Pei-Chuan
Chen, Chi-Hsin
Fan, Cheng-Yi
Sung, Chih-Wei
Lai, Pei Chun
Huang, Yen Ta
author_facet Huang, Edward Pei-Chuan
Chen, Chi-Hsin
Fan, Cheng-Yi
Sung, Chih-Wei
Lai, Pei Chun
Huang, Yen Ta
author_sort Huang, Edward Pei-Chuan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Vagal maneuvers (VagMs) are recommended as the first-line treatment of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). However, the optimal type of VagMs remains unproven. AIM: This study aims to compare the effectiveness and adverse events amongst VagMs on SVT via network meta-analyses (NMAs). METHODS: We systematically searched randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that involved adults with SVT and compared VagMs without language restrictions. We determined the initial and final responses of conversion rate to sinus rhythm and adverse events. Risk of bias (RoB) was appraised by Cochrane revised tool, and contribution matrix was calculated. NMAs were synthesized using frequentist random-effects model and presented as relative risk (RR) with 95% CI. The order of probability was presented as surface under the cumulative ranking curve analysis (SUCRA). Sensitivity analysis was performed using both Bayesian and frequentist approach with fixed- or random-effects models. Certainty of evidence (CoE) was rated by using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations methodology. RESULTS: Fourteen RCTs with 2,180 patients were enrolled. Small portion of mixed estimates was contributed from high overall RoB studies. Compared with carotid sinus massage (CSM), the modified Valsalva maneuver (MVM) was the most effective VagM after initial performance [SUCRA: 0.9992, RR: 5.47 (1.77–16.93)] and at the end of study [SUCRA: 1.0000, RR: 3.62 (2.04–6.39), CoE: high]. The standard VM did not elicit better conversion rate to the sinus rhythm than CSM at the initial response [SUCRA: 0.4395, RR: 1.97 (0.63–6.15)] and at the end of the study [SUCRA: 0.4795, RR: 1.64 (0.94–2.87), CoE: moderate]. The SUCRA value of CSM at the initial and final responses was the least one amongst three VagMs (0.0613 and 0.0205, respectively). Adverse events amongst three VagMs were similar (CoE: low). Sensitivity analyses yielded consistent results. CONCLUSION: We recommended MVM as the first choice of VagM for rhythm conversion before the pharmacological management of SVT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8850969
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88509692022-02-18 Comparison of Various Vagal Maneuvers for Supraventricular Tachycardia by Network Meta-Analysis Huang, Edward Pei-Chuan Chen, Chi-Hsin Fan, Cheng-Yi Sung, Chih-Wei Lai, Pei Chun Huang, Yen Ta Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine BACKGROUND: Vagal maneuvers (VagMs) are recommended as the first-line treatment of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). However, the optimal type of VagMs remains unproven. AIM: This study aims to compare the effectiveness and adverse events amongst VagMs on SVT via network meta-analyses (NMAs). METHODS: We systematically searched randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that involved adults with SVT and compared VagMs without language restrictions. We determined the initial and final responses of conversion rate to sinus rhythm and adverse events. Risk of bias (RoB) was appraised by Cochrane revised tool, and contribution matrix was calculated. NMAs were synthesized using frequentist random-effects model and presented as relative risk (RR) with 95% CI. The order of probability was presented as surface under the cumulative ranking curve analysis (SUCRA). Sensitivity analysis was performed using both Bayesian and frequentist approach with fixed- or random-effects models. Certainty of evidence (CoE) was rated by using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations methodology. RESULTS: Fourteen RCTs with 2,180 patients were enrolled. Small portion of mixed estimates was contributed from high overall RoB studies. Compared with carotid sinus massage (CSM), the modified Valsalva maneuver (MVM) was the most effective VagM after initial performance [SUCRA: 0.9992, RR: 5.47 (1.77–16.93)] and at the end of study [SUCRA: 1.0000, RR: 3.62 (2.04–6.39), CoE: high]. The standard VM did not elicit better conversion rate to the sinus rhythm than CSM at the initial response [SUCRA: 0.4395, RR: 1.97 (0.63–6.15)] and at the end of the study [SUCRA: 0.4795, RR: 1.64 (0.94–2.87), CoE: moderate]. The SUCRA value of CSM at the initial and final responses was the least one amongst three VagMs (0.0613 and 0.0205, respectively). Adverse events amongst three VagMs were similar (CoE: low). Sensitivity analyses yielded consistent results. CONCLUSION: We recommended MVM as the first choice of VagM for rhythm conversion before the pharmacological management of SVT. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8850969/ /pubmed/35186966 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.769437 Text en Copyright © 2022 Huang, Chen, Fan, Sung, Lai and Huang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Huang, Edward Pei-Chuan
Chen, Chi-Hsin
Fan, Cheng-Yi
Sung, Chih-Wei
Lai, Pei Chun
Huang, Yen Ta
Comparison of Various Vagal Maneuvers for Supraventricular Tachycardia by Network Meta-Analysis
title Comparison of Various Vagal Maneuvers for Supraventricular Tachycardia by Network Meta-Analysis
title_full Comparison of Various Vagal Maneuvers for Supraventricular Tachycardia by Network Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of Various Vagal Maneuvers for Supraventricular Tachycardia by Network Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Various Vagal Maneuvers for Supraventricular Tachycardia by Network Meta-Analysis
title_short Comparison of Various Vagal Maneuvers for Supraventricular Tachycardia by Network Meta-Analysis
title_sort comparison of various vagal maneuvers for supraventricular tachycardia by network meta-analysis
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8850969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35186966
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.769437
work_keys_str_mv AT huangedwardpeichuan comparisonofvariousvagalmaneuversforsupraventriculartachycardiabynetworkmetaanalysis
AT chenchihsin comparisonofvariousvagalmaneuversforsupraventriculartachycardiabynetworkmetaanalysis
AT fanchengyi comparisonofvariousvagalmaneuversforsupraventriculartachycardiabynetworkmetaanalysis
AT sungchihwei comparisonofvariousvagalmaneuversforsupraventriculartachycardiabynetworkmetaanalysis
AT laipeichun comparisonofvariousvagalmaneuversforsupraventriculartachycardiabynetworkmetaanalysis
AT huangyenta comparisonofvariousvagalmaneuversforsupraventriculartachycardiabynetworkmetaanalysis