Cargando…

A critique of narrative reviews of the evidence-base for ECT in depression

There has been recent debate regarding the efficacy of electroconvulsive therapy in the treatment of depression. This has been based on narrative reviews that contradict existing systematic reviews and meta-analyses. In this special article, we highlight the mistakes that occur when interpreting evi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meechan, C. F., Laws, K. R., Young, A. H., McLoughlin, D. M., Jauhar, S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8851059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35083968
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S2045796021000731
_version_ 1784652747215208448
author Meechan, C. F.
Laws, K. R.
Young, A. H.
McLoughlin, D. M.
Jauhar, S.
author_facet Meechan, C. F.
Laws, K. R.
Young, A. H.
McLoughlin, D. M.
Jauhar, S.
author_sort Meechan, C. F.
collection PubMed
description There has been recent debate regarding the efficacy of electroconvulsive therapy in the treatment of depression. This has been based on narrative reviews that contradict existing systematic reviews and meta-analyses. In this special article, we highlight the mistakes that occur when interpreting evidence using narrative reviews, as opposed to conventional systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8851059
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88510592022-03-04 A critique of narrative reviews of the evidence-base for ECT in depression Meechan, C. F. Laws, K. R. Young, A. H. McLoughlin, D. M. Jauhar, S. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci Special Article There has been recent debate regarding the efficacy of electroconvulsive therapy in the treatment of depression. This has been based on narrative reviews that contradict existing systematic reviews and meta-analyses. In this special article, we highlight the mistakes that occur when interpreting evidence using narrative reviews, as opposed to conventional systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Cambridge University Press 2022-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8851059/ /pubmed/35083968 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S2045796021000731 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
spellingShingle Special Article
Meechan, C. F.
Laws, K. R.
Young, A. H.
McLoughlin, D. M.
Jauhar, S.
A critique of narrative reviews of the evidence-base for ECT in depression
title A critique of narrative reviews of the evidence-base for ECT in depression
title_full A critique of narrative reviews of the evidence-base for ECT in depression
title_fullStr A critique of narrative reviews of the evidence-base for ECT in depression
title_full_unstemmed A critique of narrative reviews of the evidence-base for ECT in depression
title_short A critique of narrative reviews of the evidence-base for ECT in depression
title_sort critique of narrative reviews of the evidence-base for ect in depression
topic Special Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8851059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35083968
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S2045796021000731
work_keys_str_mv AT meechancf acritiqueofnarrativereviewsoftheevidencebaseforectindepression
AT lawskr acritiqueofnarrativereviewsoftheevidencebaseforectindepression
AT youngah acritiqueofnarrativereviewsoftheevidencebaseforectindepression
AT mcloughlindm acritiqueofnarrativereviewsoftheevidencebaseforectindepression
AT jauhars acritiqueofnarrativereviewsoftheevidencebaseforectindepression
AT meechancf critiqueofnarrativereviewsoftheevidencebaseforectindepression
AT lawskr critiqueofnarrativereviewsoftheevidencebaseforectindepression
AT youngah critiqueofnarrativereviewsoftheevidencebaseforectindepression
AT mcloughlindm critiqueofnarrativereviewsoftheevidencebaseforectindepression
AT jauhars critiqueofnarrativereviewsoftheevidencebaseforectindepression